M
Marc_Aupiais
Guest
vaticanstate.va/EN/State_and_Government/Structure_Governorate/Presidency/President/2007/14_May_2007.htm“I wish to emphasize that terrorism by the IRA in Northern Ireland has always been openly condemned by all Irish bishops and by the Pope. Furthermore, the Northern Irish terrorists have never justified their actions by invoking the Gospel - nor could they because the Gospel does not offer any pretext for violence. A religious aspect of the IRA’s acts of terrorism perhaps can be seen in the fact that the IRA sought to end the social discrimination of Catholics by Protestants. Islamic terrorists, on the contrary, consider their acts also as a war against infidels by invoking – unjustly so – the Koran. But all religious leaders should raise their voices to condemn terrorism.
Religion should lead mankind to love their fellow man as God, his creator, loves every man and woman. No religion can consider itself pleasing to God when it disseminates hatred. You ask what each lay individual can do. Each one can begin to be a builder of peace in his daily life. Jesus said: “Blessed are those who work for peace, for they shall be called children of God”. But before one can give peace to others, one must first have peace in his own heart because “wicked designs come from the deep recesses of the heart”, as the Gospel says.”
What is our stance on violence, when, or if acceptable, or unacceptable, add to this torture, or other things, does the law of dual effect (self defense) ever enter into it? what of Christians who are attacked? In any case, I’d like facts and views, this is of import. Also, where do we stand on just wars, or mediation, is it just to leave a dictator in charge, especially an illegal human rights abuser, and when is rebellion just? was the rebellion against the Nazi’s just, and what would make it just as compared with the IRA, who seem condemned by officials? this is confusing to me, please comment,
Pax
Marc Aupiais