R
RGCheek
Guest
catholicapologetics.info/modernproblems/currenterrors/race.htm
As contrasted to bigotry, which is the practice of being a bigot which is: “: a person who strongly and unfairly dislikes other people, ideas, etc. : a bigoted person; especially : a person who hates or refuses to accept the members of a particular group (such as a racial or religious group.”
So a distinction would seem to be that while a white bigot might not want to live next door to a black family of Catholics and would prefer a white drug dealer’s crack house instead, but a white racist would agree and want to impose on the community a system of laws that discriminates by code against blacks and wont let them live near whites to begin with.
Am I far off?
Then I find this definition of racism by a ‘Catholic’ web site:
catholicismandracism.weebly.com/index.html
Is it important to distinguish between ideological racism vrs ignorant bigotry?
It seem to me that there is as the ideology is more dangers and deserves to be stamped out ASAP while the bigotry is like the surf and has its own source of origin due to ignorance, which is a natural state for mankind absent higher powers of education and revelation.
Thoughts? I want to make a point next but I would like to nail this down first before I blunder on along.
***Racism is a doctrine ***which asserts that race is the essential and initial factor in man’s refinement and in the historical and cultural evolution of all peoples.1
This is referring to a system of ideas or ideology in which a persons value is based solely upon the race and nothing more.What is condemned by traditional theologians is not the recognition of “psychic and morphological differences between races” but the idea that posits something other than Jesus Christ and His Church as the basis of human culture. Every person has a soul worth saving, and baptism puts us all on a level playing field as far as spiritual and moral potential are concerned. Therefore, by stripping the word “racism” of its contemporary emotional baggage,*** it becomes clear that this race-based outlook, in its strictest sense, means more than just crude bigotry. It is a fundamentally materialist view of creation***. Thus there cannot be a “good” form of racism any more than there can be a “benign” form of socialism.
As contrasted to bigotry, which is the practice of being a bigot which is: “: a person who strongly and unfairly dislikes other people, ideas, etc. : a bigoted person; especially : a person who hates or refuses to accept the members of a particular group (such as a racial or religious group.”
So a distinction would seem to be that while a white bigot might not want to live next door to a black family of Catholics and would prefer a white drug dealer’s crack house instead, but a white racist would agree and want to impose on the community a system of laws that discriminates by code against blacks and wont let them live near whites to begin with.
Am I far off?
Then I find this definition of racism by a ‘Catholic’ web site:
catholicismandracism.weebly.com/index.html
Now that sounds to me more like bigotry being described here, and not racism.Racism is the belief that all members of specific group or race possess characteristics, abilities or qualites that can be seen as inferior to another group or race.
So in other words racism can be seen as having different views, practices and actions that reflect specific group’s beliefs and other races see them as less desirable and of less value.
Is it important to distinguish between ideological racism vrs ignorant bigotry?
It seem to me that there is as the ideology is more dangers and deserves to be stamped out ASAP while the bigotry is like the surf and has its own source of origin due to ignorance, which is a natural state for mankind absent higher powers of education and revelation.
Thoughts? I want to make a point next but I would like to nail this down first before I blunder on along.