What is the biggest misconception non-Catholics have of Catholicism?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tommy999
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
This.

Taboo topic that never gets talked about because it’s erroneously believed to have been beaten to death, yet nobody bats an eye when someone wants to talk about Mary - again.

I dunno. 🤷
So you wanna talk about Constantine and Catholics NOT being Christian? What my friend is your position on that issue?🙂

I’m willing to discuss it.

Gd Bless you,

Patrick
 
I have come to realize that God decides who is saved on judgment day and not us, and that we must keep persevering in the faith.

Salvation is not just one decision and you’re done – it is a lifetime journey.
:amen:
 
Originally Posted by boomerang View Post
The worst false belief is that Catholics aren’t Christian and aren’t saved; that it is a pagan religion invented by Emperor Constantine. Now, THAT is ignorant. Everything else is small potatoes compared to that one.

This.

Taboo topic that never gets talked about because it’s erroneously believed to have been beaten to death, yet nobody bats an eye when someone wants to talk about Mary - again.

I dunno. 🤷
I don’t think this misconception is talked about enough either (The Catholics are not Christian part), but I think the population of those who hold to the misconception is rather small because…

Since Christians can be known by their love and people see good action out of the Church, the ‘go-to observation’* for ’ Catholics are not Christian’, seems to take a back seat for most Non-Catholics.

Take care,

mike
  • go-to observation -The Eucharist - appearance as bread being worshipped and the explanation not running from the appearance, rather detailing what cannot be seen plainly with the eye.
 
One I heard from a friend of mine, who is Evangelical Free Church of America.

I made the old joke about being Catholic and not reading the Bible. She replied with a 😉 , “That’s because they read it for you.”
 
One I heard from a friend of mine, who is Evangelical Free Church of America.

I made the old joke about being Catholic and not reading the Bible. She replied with a 😉 , “That’s because they read it for you.”
Good one, on_the_hill. 😃

The readings from scripture was one of my favorite parts of the Mass I went to in person.
Since I have a knee issue, all the bending and kneeling left me a bit lame the next day, but a Catholic I know at work said you don’t have to do all that if you are unable. You just have to show reverence, I believe he said, like a small bow – if I recall.
 
A necessary clarification here:)

**IN a case of uncontrollable circumstances; commonly but not always related to WORK; a dispensation being SOUGHT is not necessary.

When one DESIRES to fulfill sincerely their Sunday Obligation [a Mortal sin] BUT for reasons BEYOND their control arises; NO sin is attached to this event.**
**HOWEVER an effort ought to be made to attend a DAILY Mass in place of this IF at ALL possible [NOT EASY: Possible:thumbsup:]

If this is also NOT a REAL possibility; then some quiet time with God in Prayer [like a Rosary for example] will do.**
IF ever in doubt, discuss your circumstances with your Confessor priest.🙂
Both receiving JESUS [nothing LESS than GOD] either in one’s hand or on the tongue is a MATTER OF personal piety. BOTH ARE valid and licit:thumbsup:
Thanks for clarifying the bolded, Patrick.

If I understood you correctly, no special dispensation is needed for a Catholic who either can’t go due to work obligations like I described in my earlier post (post #69). Is that correct? If so, that is good to know and makes me feel like it wouldn’t be an issue if I were Catholic.

I am on-call one week out of the month where I can get called in at any time of day or night, especially on the weekend, and I have had to occasionally miss church from time to time or sometimes I have gotten a page during church, at which time I have to discreetly leave. That is why I try to sit in the back or side where I can get away without disturbing too many people.

On weekends when I am not on-call, I can relax more and sit closer to the front and focus on the proceedings and on the Lord, knowing I won’t be disturbed or that I won’t disturb anyone else, except with my singing during the hymns :). I don’t have the best singing voice in the world but I try to make up for it with my enthusiasm . .
 
Good one, on_the_hill. 😃

The readings from scripture was one of my favorite parts of the Mass I went to in person.
Since I have a knee issue, all the bending and kneeling left me a bit lame the next day, but a Catholic I know at work said you don’t have to do all that if you are unable. You just have to show reverence, I believe he said, like a small bow – if I recall.
I should hope so!
 
One I heard from a friend of mine, who is Evangelical Free Church of America.

I made the old joke about being Catholic and not reading the Bible. She replied with a 😉 , “That’s because they read it for you.”
To quote Tommy999, “:D”.

But also, this reminds me of something else, relating to how Protestants blow the “monolithic” thing way out of proportion.

It was something a Protestant friend of mine said. This isn’t someone who was into weird notions of Catholics worshipping idols or anything (in fact, sometimes he would ask me an insightful “Why do Catholics …” question that got me thinking about something in a new way). But one Time I mentioned that I was joining a Catholic bible study / discussion group that had just been formed. This is the one time I recall him being baffled by something a Catholic said: he couldn’t understand how such a group could discuss a bible passage, since there wouldn’t be any differing views in the group!
 
To quote Tommy999, “:D”.

But also, this reminds me of something else, relating to how Protestants blow the “monolithic” thing way out of proportion.

It was something a Protestant friend of mine said. This isn’t someone who was into weird notions of Catholics worshipping idols or anything (in fact, sometimes he would ask me an insightful “Why do Catholics …” question that got me thinking about something in a new way). But one Time I mentioned that I was joining a Catholic bible study / discussion group that had just been formed. This is the one time I recall him being baffled by something a Catholic said: he couldn’t understand how such a group could discuss a bible passage, since there wouldn’t be any differing views in the group!
So “discuss” doesn’t mean share insights, but “share disagreements” and “agree to disagree”?🤷
 
So “discuss” doesn’t mean share insights, but “share disagreements” and “agree to disagree”?🤷
Apparently so, but then many Protestants know very little about Catholic insights/spiritualities, so that’s really no surprise.

Another thing I’ve seen on CAF, thinking of Catholic supposedly being monolithic, is the idea that various rites, orders, and so on within the Church means the Church isn’t really one, as she claims to be. Again, it’s because they have little idea about differing spiritualities within the Church, how various rites, etc. can be Catholic without being Latin Rite Catholics (the ones most people know about).

Also that if some Catholics differ with the Church that makes them another church, so once again, the Catholic claim of unity is untrue. Again, ignorance is the main cause of this, but with some, sadly, it’s deliberate obfustication of facts so they can remain obstinately set against any reasonable apologetics for the Church and her teachings.
 
Apparently so, but then many Protestants know very little about Catholic insights/spiritualities, so that’s really no surprise.

Another thing I’ve seen on CAF, thinking of Catholic supposedly being monolithic, is the idea that various rites, orders, and so on within the Church means the Church isn’t really one, as she claims to be. Again, it’s because they have little idea about differing spiritualities within the Church, how various rites, etc. can be Catholic without being Latin Rite Catholics (the ones most people know about).

Also that if some Catholics differ with the Church that makes them another church, so once again, the Catholic claim of unity is untrue. Again, ignorance is the main cause of this, **but with some, sadly, it’s deliberate obfustication of facts **so they can remain obstinately set against any reasonable apologetics for the Church and her teachings.
Well, I really tend to think that Protestants come here with the best of intentions. I think they just don’t realize how much they stereotype us.
 
Not by that many Catholics apologists it hasn’t. (Have you done a search for Constantine on the CAL search page? I did. There aren’t nearly as many as there are for Mary.) I understand the decision by CAF forum elders that Constantine isn’t to be discussed on CAF because it is the purview of Chick tracts and the like – do people today even know what Chick tracts are? – and non-Catholics should know better – why doesn’t that rationale apply to other topics? I do maintain it’s a double standard of what constitutes “beaten to death” – again, by who? – but again, when in Rome, so I will honor the request to mention the topic only sparingly.
 
Well, I really tend to think that Protestants come here with the best of intentions. I think they just don’t realize how much they stereotype us.
I wasn’t aware that I did this, but perhaps I do without realizing it. I hope I don’t offend anyone. I respect Catholics and Catholicism a lot or else I would’ve dropped out of CAF a long time ago.

Monolithic in the dictionary:
" .…Of an organization or system: large, powerful, and intractably indivisible and uniform"

Is the Catholic Church large? Check. It is the largest Christian faith tradition with the most members in the world.

Is it powerful? Check. Arguably it is still very powerful, although not nearly as politically powerful as it was 500 or 600 years ago. The pope is still very influential. For example, Pope Francis played a key role in re-establishing diplomatic relations between the US and Cuba. A Presbyterian or a Baptist didn’t do that.

I’ll skip “intractably indivisible” because I’m not sure what that means. 🙂

Uniform? Possibly. When I went to a Catholic Mass, everyone seemed to stand and kneel at the same moment, make the same responsive replies at the same moment, signed at the same time. and did a lot of the same things at the same times at Mass. It was like a close-order drill.

In contrast, at an evangelical church service you might see some folks raising their hands in praise, a few saying “Amen” during the sermon, others quietly taking sermon notes, while a few doze off, and that might even be within the same family 😃

In other words, I think Catholics are more monolithic than Protestants, but I would view that as a compliment, because Catholics seem to be more in one accord, and I am not speaking of the automobile made by Honda.

For example:
If you had a Protestant Bible study made up of a Baptist, a Methodist, Assembly of God, a Presbyterian, a Lutheran, and Church of Christ person, you would probably get a wide variety of interpretations regarding such topics as the meaning of baptism and how to do it (sprinkling or immersion), speaking in tongues, social dancing and drinking alcohol, music in church, predestination or not, the significance of communion, and a lot of other things.

I would expect a group of Catholics in a Bible study to be more uniform in their thinking, which is a reflection of a higher level teaching authority (magisterium) and a more organized and unified structure. I consider that to be a compliment to Catholics for teaching doctrinal consistency.

I realize there is a variety of expression and flexibility within the different Catholic religious orders and worship styles at Mass (Contemporary, traditional, Latin, etc), but I can see why Protestants may think Catholics are more similar, and I don’t necessarily view that as a bad thing.

If I am missing the point you were making about being monolithic, please correct me.
 
I wasn’t aware that I did this, but perhaps I do without realizing it. I hope I don’t offend anyone. I respect Catholics and Catholicism a lot or else I would’ve dropped out of CAF a long time ago.

Monolithic in the dictionary:
" .…Of an organization or system: large, powerful, and intractably indivisible and uniform"

Is the Catholic Church large? Check. It is the largest Christian faith tradition with the most members in the world.

Is it powerful? Check. Arguably it is still very powerful, although not nearly as politically powerful as it was 500 or 600 years ago. The pope is still very influential. For example, Pope Francis played a key role in re-establishing diplomatic relations between the US and Cuba. A Presbyterian or a Baptist didn’t do that.

I’ll skip “intractably indivisible” because I’m not sure what that means. 🙂

Uniform? Possibly. When I went to a Catholic Mass, everyone seemed to stand and kneel at the same moment, make the same responsive replies at the same moment, signed at the same time. and did a lot of the same things at the same times at Mass. It was like a close-order drill.

In contrast, at an evangelical church service you might see some folks raising their hands in praise, a few saying “Amen” during the sermon, others quietly taking sermon notes, while a few doze off, and that might even be within the same family 😃

In other words, I think Catholics are more monolithic than Protestants, but I would view that as a compliment, because Catholics seem to be more in one accord, and I am not speaking of the automobile made by Honda.

For example:
If you had a Protestant Bible study made up of a Baptist, a Methodist, Assembly of God, a Presbyterian, a Lutheran, and Church of Christ person, you would probably get a wide variety of interpretations regarding such topics as the meaning of baptism and how to do it (sprinkling or immersion), speaking in tongues, social dancing and drinking alcohol, music in church, predestination or not, the significance of communion, and a lot of other things.

I would expect a group of Catholics in a Bible study to be more uniform in their thinking, which is a reflection of a higher level teaching authority (magisterium) and a more organized and unified structure. I consider that to be a compliment to Catholics for teaching doctrinal consistency.

I realize there is a variety of expression and flexibility within the different Catholic religious orders and worship styles at Mass (Contemporary, traditional, Latin, etc), but I can see why Protestants may think Catholics are more similar, and I don’t necessarily view that as a bad thing.

If I am missing the point you were making about being monolithic, please correct me.
Oh don’t get me wrong, I can understand why Protestants apply the term “monolithic” to us. The problem is that it’s greatly exaggerated sometimes.

Consider: if I envisioned all Protestants as Fundamentalists, what kind of impression would I have of Protestantism? :hmmm:
 
Oh don’t get me wrong, I can understand why Protestants apply the term “monolithic” to us. The problem is that it’s greatly exaggerated sometimes.

Consider: if I envisioned all Protestants as Fundamentalists, what kind of impression would I have of Protestantism? :hmmm:
Good point, Peter. It would be a misrepresentation or a distortion, although it might not be intentional in nature.
 
Well, I really tend to think that Protestants come here with the best of intentions. I think they just don’t realize how much they stereotype us.
Over the years I’ve seen people come here with every intention imaginable. 😛 But, those whose intentions were to simply denigrate Catholicism have dropped off dramatically in recent years because 1) it’s against forum rules, and 2) it gets them nowhere. If there weren’t some people whose only intention is to denigrate the Church no anti-Catholic websites would exist. I wasn’t talking about CAF alone, but in general, you see. Sorry for the misunderstanding. 🙂
 
This question is addressed to Catholics.

What is the biggest misconception that non-Catholic Christians have of Catholics and Catholicism?

For example, what stereotypes or incorrect assumptions are made of Catholics or Catholicism that are inaccurate or unfair that you wish could be addressed and corrected once and for all?

One inaccurate assumption that comes to mind for me is that I have heard some Protestant Christians refer to Catholicism as a “works-based” religion instead of a “faith-based” one. I have come to realize that is not the case. Sure, works are important in Catholicism but faith plays a big part, too.
Emperor Constantine founded our religion.
 
I wasn’t aware that I did this, but perhaps I do without realizing it. I hope I don’t offend anyone. I respect Catholics and Catholicism a lot or else I would’ve dropped out of CAF a long time ago.
I wouldn’t worry about this. I don’t think there is anything someone could point out that would offend anyone here. I think the offense would only occur if someone made a false accusation knowing full well that there was no Catholic response that they would be willing to accept or try to understand.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top