D
diggerdomer
Guest
No, not right, it can have multiple meanings, which could be true. That’s not contrary to reason. See the Catechism para 115-119 for instance. Depending on the “sense” one is using in interpreting a given passage, one could come up with numerous rational, faithful, and true interpretations.But don’t you think that approach [of treating the passages in the Bible as not teaching just one truth] is contrary to reason as well as to biblical teaching? There could only be one truth, not two and most certainly not many. For example, when the book of Revelation speaks of a “woman” it could only mean one thing. If God used “woman” to symbolize a church, it could not be anything but a church, right?