R
Robert_Sock
Guest
Of all the engineering feats of this world, why can’t social engineering end homelessness in America? It’s all a matter of public policy, I believe. What are your thoughts?
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1380802/Am J Public Health. 1997 February; 87(2): 249–255.**
Adverse childhood experiences: are they risk factors for adult homelessness?**
D B Herman, E S Susser, E L Struening, and B L Link
OBJECTIVES: We tested the hypothesis that adverse childhood experiences are risk factors for adult homelessness. METHODS: We interviewed a nationally representative sample of 92 US household members who had previously been homeless and a comparison group of 395 individuals with no prior homelessness. We assessed childhood adversity with a structured protocol that included a previously validated scale indicating lack of care from parents and single-item measures of physical and sexual abuse. RESULTS: Lack of care from a parent during childhood sharply increased the likelihood of subsequent homelessness (odds ratio [OR] = 13), as did physical abuse (OR = 16). Sexual abuse during childhood was associated with a nonsignificant trend toward homelessness (OR = 1.7). The risk of subsequent homelessness among individuals who experienced both lack of care and either type of abuse was dramatically increased compared with subjects reporting neither of these adversities (OR = 26). CONCLUSIONS: Adverse childhood experiences are powerful risk factors for adult homelessness. Effectively reducing child abuse and neglect may ultimately help prevent critical social problems including homelessness.
All of this very complex question boils down to “Sin”…Of all the engineering feats of this world, why can’t social engineering end homelessness in America? It’s all a matter of public policy, I believe. What are your thoughts?
Seems to me we need, first of all, to know what we mean by “homeless”. Do we mean that one is “homeless” if he doesn’t own his own home, or do we mean someone who lives with relatives, or do we mean one who lives on the street or in a shelter?
If “on the street” or “in a shelter”, then it’s narrowed quite a bit in numbers. A substantial number of them are insane people who could, if they would, get housing subsidies and sometimes have, but, being insane, walk away. Since institutionalization is virtually gone now in favor of “human rights”, there is probably no real cure for that kind of homelessness.
Some of it really is due to bad conduct. Any landlord can give you descriptions of people who rented, then failed to pay the rent, then resisted eviction, despite the fact that they had the apparent means to pay. Some of them wreck the place before they’re forcibly evicted. Some of those people spend all their money on drugs, and some are simply predatory. A history of landlord abuse tends to follow a person, to the degree that most won’t rent to them if they know the history.
I’m not sure how many people are left if you eliminate those two. I’m aware of people who have ended up in a diocesan shelter who lost their jobs and couldn’t find another. But most of those people eventually do end up standing on their own feet; that is, unless they are drug users.
I don’t personally think there is any single cause of homelessness in this country. I also question whether the number of sane, non-addicted people really are homeless through no fault of their own is very large or permanent.
Seems to me we need, first of all, to know what we mean by “homeless”. Do we mean that one is “homeless” if he doesn’t own his own home, or do we mean someone who lives with relatives, or do we mean one who lives on the street or in a shelter?
If “on the street” or “in a shelter”, then it’s narrowed quite a bit in numbers. A substantial number of them are insane people who could, if they would, get housing subsidies and sometimes have, but, being insane, walk away. Since institutionalization is virtually gone now in favor of “human rights”, there is probably no real cure for that kind of homelessness.
Some of it really is due to bad conduct. Any landlord can give you descriptions of people who rented, then failed to pay the rent, then resisted eviction, despite the fact that they had the apparent means to pay. Some of them wreck the place before they’re forcibly evicted. Some of those people spend all their money on drugs, and some are simply predatory. A history of landlord abuse tends to follow a person, to the degree that most won’t rent to them if they know the history.
I’m not sure how many people are left if you eliminate those two. I’m aware of people who have ended up in a diocesan shelter who lost their jobs and couldn’t find another. But most of those people eventually do end up standing on their own feet; that is, unless they are drug users.
I don’t personally think there is any single cause of homelessness in this country. I also question whether the number of sane, non-addicted people really are homeless through no fault of their own is very large or permanent.
The only other group of homeless that seem to have significant numbers in the larger cities are runaways.Seems to me we need, first of all, to know what we mean by “homeless”. Do we mean that one is “homeless” if he doesn’t own his own home, or do we mean someone who lives with relatives, or do we mean one who lives on the street or in a shelter?
If “on the street” or “in a shelter”, then it’s narrowed quite a bit in numbers. A substantial number of them are insane people who could, if they would, get housing subsidies and sometimes have, but, being insane, walk away. Since institutionalization is virtually gone now in favor of “human rights”, there is probably no real cure for that kind of homelessness.
Some of it really is due to bad conduct. Any landlord can give you descriptions of people who rented, then failed to pay the rent, then resisted eviction, despite the fact that they had the apparent means to pay. Some of them wreck the place before they’re forcibly evicted. Some of those people spend all their money on drugs, and some are simply predatory. A history of landlord abuse tends to follow a person, to the degree that most won’t rent to them if they know the history.
I’m not sure how many people are left if you eliminate those two. I’m aware of people who have ended up in a diocesan shelter who lost their jobs and couldn’t find another. But most of those people eventually do end up standing on their own feet; that is, unless they are drug users.
I don’t personally think there is any single cause of homelessness in this country. I also question whether the number of sane, non-addicted people really are homeless through no fault of their own is very large or permanent.
To use John 12:8 as proof for the plight of the poor, is to risk false judgment. Being poor is not a bad thing if one is rich in spirit. Wherever there is pain and suffering, people (i.e. government) need to assist in the alleviation of that pain and suffering.[BIBLEDRB]John 12:8[/BIBLEDRB]
You are asking a question about how man goes about solving a problem that will never be solved. At least until Jesus returns. So instead of seeking utopia by trying to end homelessness and meeting it with absolute failure, how about trying to make the homeless lives better?
I think you are misunderstanding me. The question you are asking is, what can we do to eradicate homelessness. I’m simply telling you that it’s impossible. Instead of trying to solve noble, yet fanciful notions of eradicating poverty and homelessness, the best we can do is to do our best individually to help these people.To use John 12:8 as proof for the plight of the poor, is to risk false judgment. Being poor is not a bad thing if one is rich in spirit. Wherever there is pain and suffering, people (i.e. government) need to assist in the alleviation of that pain and suffering.
The road to Hell is paved with good intentions ~ Saint Bernard of Clairvaux
With God all things are possible. Eradicating homelessness should not be that big of a deal. But God has his reasons for allowing homelessness to continue. I realize that many of the homeless people have deep seated psychological problems that causes them to become homeless. Alcohol and drug use abound in the homeless population.I think you are misunderstanding me. The question you are asking is, what can we do to eradicate homelessness. I’m simply telling you that it’s impossible. Instead of trying to solve noble, yet fanciful notions of eradicating poverty and homelessness, the best we can do is to do our best individually to help these people.
Government edict after government edict has been tried and failed and has caused a lot of misery in the process. Section 8 housing was one and it has led to rampant crime and the deaths of many minority youths. Then came the CRA which allowed very poor people to afford a home.This led to the biggest financial and housing crash in decades. Many people are out of work and are now poor, thanks to these people with their “noble” intentions of eradicating poverty with other people’s money.