What is the Eastern take on Eucharistic miracles?

  • Thread starter Thread starter theistgal
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
From what I’ve read, the Icon of the Inexhaustible Cup is a Eucharistic Miracle depicted on an Icon. The story goes that after the Epiclesis the priest looked in the Chalice and there was a little Baby inside. I’m no expert though.
 
From what I’ve read, the Icon of the Inexhaustible Cup is a Eucharistic Miracle depicted on an Icon. The story goes that after the Epiclesis the priest looked in the Chalice and there was a little Baby inside. I’m no expert though.
(Back for another shot at this! 😉 )

But see, that kind of miracle doesn’t bother me so much, and perhaps now that I’ve had time to think about it, I can explain why.

My understanding is that the Eucharist, once consecrated, is Jesus in His entirety - Body and Blood and Soul and Divinity. A vision like this one, where you look in the chalice and see the baby Jesus, or any vision of Jesus in His entirety, makes sense in that context.

However, from my POV, the miracles which only show the Body or the Blood (or the “spiritual presence”) may actually diminish the reality of transubstantiation for some (not all!). (“Is Christ divided?”)

Not saying those private visions don’t occur but they’re not for everyone, and those who don’t find them useful or compelling shouldn’t be made to feel like “bad Catholics”.

Now does that make any sense at all or am I still a bad Catholic? :hmmm:
 
You’re not a bad Catholic, no one is required to believe in any private revelation. I do, but you don’t have to. I don’t follow the apparitions on the sides of buildings, in trees, in tortillas, etc… I do believe in the approved apparitions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top