L
larkin31
Guest
This definition is too narrow, in my view. It leaves out the possibility, by definition, simply because of their religion, for billions on this planet to have a full or complete love. That is absurd to me, and contrary to 1000s of years and billions and billions of pairs of loving couples and their experiences.Here, here or “hear, hear” as the case may be.
And now for a definition of terms. One of my favorite short stories is by Ray Carver. It made Esquires list of 75 books every man (and woman I guess) should read.
You can find a summary here:
payingattentiontothesky.com/what-we-talk-about-when-we-talk-about-love/
Now in addition to that depiction of modern love, I would advance my definition of love by looking to Thomas Aquinas: "Each human act is considered right and virtuous when it conforms to the standard of divine love. But when a human act does not conform to the standard of love, then it is not right, nor good, nor perfect.
This law of divine love accomplishes in a person four things that are much to be desired. First, it is the cause of one’s spiritual life. For it is evident that by the very nature of the action what is loved is in the one who loves. Therefore whoever loves God possesses God in himself; for scripture says, Whoever remains in love remains in God and God in him. It is the nature of love to transform the lover into the object loved. And so if we love God, we ourselves become divinized; for again, Whoever is joined to God becomes one spirit with him.
Augustine adds, “As the soul is the life of the body, so God is the life of the soul.” Thus the soul acts virtuously and perfectly when she acts through charity, and through charity God lives in her; indeed, without charity she cannot act; for scripture says, Whoever does not love, remains in death. If a person possesses all the gifts of the Holy Spirit, but lacks charity, that person has no life. For it matters not whether one has the grace of tongues, or the gift of faith, or any other gift such as prophecy; these do not bring life without charity. Even if a dead body should be adorned with gold and precious jewels, it nevertheless remains dead."
Elsewhere Thomas has written that love is willing the good of the other as other.
Can you accept these reflections as a good definition of love or would you care to add/detract whatever?
Thanks
dj
And there is no such thing as “perfect love.” It is an ideal, based in religious teaching or romantic superficiality, that also has nothing to do with how people actually live and love and find contentment and fulfillment.