What is the MOST traditional outfit to wear to Mass?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Glorthac
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
G

Glorthac

Guest
As traditional Catholics, you want men to wear their Sunday best, probably a suit right? But of the millions of combinations, what is the MOST traditional?

I know this question might be silly, but maybe not. I take it a rainbow tie is frowned upon? What about the blazer? Is black preferred to gray? What material should it be made of? And the pants, black too?

Give me the rundown on the perfect outfit for Mass.
 
This question is silly as dress style is dependent upon time and place - it is culturally determined. Did Catholics in Rome in the 1500s wear a modern suit? It is absurd adopt 1950s American cultural norms as Catholic doctrine. The key is to wear something modest, reverent, and respectable as defined by basic principles of natural law (which sets the ‘minimum standards’ for modesty) and cultural norms of dress.
 
I would imagine that God prefers a clean conscience “worn” to Mass, as opposed to heeding the dictates of fashion, if He were to make His preferences known! However, modest, clean, and respectful clothing appropriate to the season, culture, and occasion is perfectly acceptable. By “modest,” I also include avoiding an outfit which would cause undue distraction–it’s just as immodest to wear excessively rich and ornate clothing as it is to wear excessively revealing clothing. Any of the outfits you describe would be fine.

My late father, rest his soul, was in the Normandy invasion. He described the most moving Mass he ever attended in a small church in Normandy. I can assure you that he and his platoon took little heed in their appearance, other than possibly cleaning up and field shaving, and I’m sure that they were not the tidiest after being under fire for a few days. I’m equally sure that God heard their prayers of praise and thanksgiving for just being alive, despite their decidedly grubby appearance!🙂
 
The most traditional thing to wear at my parish could be described as resort casual. We are not close to anything like a vacation spot, but that is how people dress. In the summer, it’s often shorts, camp shirts, tees and the like. One seldom sees business suits or neckties. Too often, the younger members look as if they are headed to or from the beach with the shortest possible shorts, immodest blouses, low cut hiphuggers, etc. There is nothing that could be defined as traditional dress.

On the other hand, when I am in my Southern hometown, everyone is in at least business casual for Mass. Suits and ties are very common.
 
For men a clean shirt or polo and slacks or clean jeans are fine. No one expects you to dress up as if you were going to the office nor to dress down as if you were going to play soccer. As someone said, culture and climate are importanat concerns, so are economics.

If you make the rules too lax, it becomes ridiculous and if you make them too formal, there are some who cannot afford it. The best rule is use common sense.

Even religious men pay attention to culture, climate and economics. For example, we often wear a very light weight habit or a work tunic, which is shorter. It goes down just above the knees and fastened at the waiste with a belt instead of the chord. That’s because we’re in very hot and humid climate. Our postulants wear whtie polo shirts and grey slacks. In the cooler climates we wear the traditional wool blend habit with chord, scapular and cowl. The postulants wear a long-sleeve white shirt and slacks. However, oiur brothers in the missions do not wear the traditional habit, because it is very expensive to make. One habit costs $225.00. The climate is very warm and you can’t afford to have more than two habits. But the climate requires at least four if you’re going to wear them daily. By mid-afternoon, they are seaty and they smell. You have to change into a second habit. That’s a financial hardship for us. They wear a work tunic or slacks and a shirt. The complte habit is worn when the weather allows it or when the church has AC, which is only in the cities, not in the jungles.

The same rule of common sense would apply to a secular man. Factor in culture, climate and affordability and you should come up with something that is casual but smart at the same time. That would be the minimum. A suit and tie are never too much, but not everyone can afford a suit or wear one in certain climates. So I always advise people as to how low on the ladder you can go before you’re inappropriately dressed. Anything less than a polo and a nice pair of jeans is inappropriate.

Having said that, there are cultures where shorts are commonly worn for work, school and other functions where Americans would wear slacks. But I have not seen shorts worn for work in the USA, as a general rule. They are usually considered recreational apparel only in the USA, whereas a button-down shirt and jeans or a nice polo and jeans are more common, provided the jeans are in good shape. Again, use common sense.

I’m assuming that we’re talking about men’s clothing, not women’s or did I misunderstand the original post?

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
It depends on a couple of things, I think. If you were to accept an invitation to meet a head of state, be he a president, king or prime minister, where there would be a cloud of witnesses, wearing anything other than your best or nicest clothing, then why should you care any less that you are “accepting an invitation” to a banquet whose Host is your Creator, Redeemer and Sanctifier? A banquet during which the lines between heaven and earth are for a moment dissolved and you are in the presence of the greatest cloud of witnesses.

If the best you own are work stained and torn jeans, t shirt and sneakers, then you are offering your own “first born of the flock”. If the best you own are khakis and polo shirt, you are offering your best. But if the best you own is dress slacks shirt and tie and you offer something less, then what point are you ultimately making?
 
Wow, all these long posts!

The answer is wear a jacket and tie. Suits are nice but blazers and pants are also quite seen in traditional circles. All of these things are easily obtainable either at a department store or a charity shop, depending on budget.

Oh, and you only really need one decent suit. One gentleman on a traditional forum posted a really good list that I think provides an excellent guide for selecting a Mass wardrobe that will last a lifetime (and not go out of style!):

one or two suits in blue or grey
a blue or black jacket or sports coat
a jacket for summer (khaki or blue cotton or, if you want to be really fancy, seersucker)
a tweed/wool jacket for winter
year-round grey wool trousers (light or dark or both)
a few pairs of khakis
3 white and 3 blue shirts
a selection of ties

Hope this helps. Oh, and for those who say we shouldn’t dress like the 1950’s, I beg to differ. Suits are no more 1950’s then they are 1896 or 2010. Unlike the modern attire which is constantly changing, a nice suit is timeless. 👍
 
Exactly whose tradition are you considering? There is no such thing as traditional US anything other than perhaps individuality.
 
As traditional Catholics, you want men to wear their Sunday best, probably a suit right? But of the millions of combinations, what is the MOST traditional?

I know this question might be silly, but maybe not. I take it a rainbow tie is frowned upon? What about the blazer? Is black preferred to gray? What material should it be made of? And the pants, black too?

Give me the rundown on the perfect outfit for Mass.
if you are not on the altar, there is no such thing. It used to be whatever was considered “Sunday formal” or business wear, but since there is no such thing in our culture any more, my best suggestion is whatever you would wear to an interview for a white color management position. If you can’t afford that, wear whatever is the best you have, and make sure it is clean and modest.

here in SoTex there seems to be 3 traditional Sunday looks for men: the business casual for Winter Texans and anglos, basically golf shirt and slacks with leather shoes. The white or pastel short sleeve cotton shirt, starched and crisply ironed with squared hem, worn out over black slacks, and Texas formal–new jeans, cuffed, with wide leather belt, enormous silver buckle with matching bolo tie and slide, white starched long-sleeve western style shirt, and stetson doffed at the church door.
 
Most traditional would be, I would say, a basic black or grey suit.

Don’t wear jeans to mass.
 
My late father, rest his soul, was in the Normandy invasion.
Yours too? We can share some good war stories then. 🙂 My father just showed me a book where his picture was in and they did show nothing but their dirty uniforms. They did have one picture where a Mass was said in the open and from the picture’s appearance there were soldiers and others from many different countries there.
 
Any outfit that is pre-1963.
No, you a modernist. Quo Primum “canonized” the state of menswear as of 1570, so a genuine, Traditional – no, let me make that T bigger: Traditional – Catholic would wear something like this (the sword is liturgically appropriate; see Ps. 149:6-7) :

 
No, you a modernist. Quo Primum “canonized” the state of menswear as of 1570, so a genuine, Traditional – no, let me make that T bigger: Traditional – Catholic would wear something like this (the sword is liturgically appropriate; see Ps. 149:6-7) :

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9e/Moroni_Don_Gabriel_de_la_Cueva.jpg
It certainly needs to be post-Trent though, yes?

And you must find a New Testament basis for the Sword, as some items found in the Psalms are not applicable. Christ told Peter to put away his sword, actually, so I think the sword must leave.

I think these are some of the ushers;

 
It certainly needs to be post-Trent though, yes?

And you must find a New Testament basis for the Sword, as some items found in the Psalms are not applicable. Christ told Peter to put away his sword, actually, so I think the sword must leave.

I think these are some of the ushers;

http://www.gentlemansemporium.com/webimages/gallery_1870_irish_cuba-5.gif
Wow anyone wearing those suits is lame and really stuck in the past. I just wear long sleve button down shirt with dress pants, and if it’s hot, a polo shirt. Once in a while I will wear some real nice jeans that are dark, but that’s rare.
 
Wow anyone wearing those suits is lame and really stuck in the past. I just wear long sleve button down shirt with dress pants, and if it’s hot, a polo shirt. Once in a while I will wear some real nice jeans that are dark, but that’s rare.
Guess I’ll be over there with the lame crowd. 👍

Here’s a rare look inside a Church during Mass pre-Vatican II. This particular Catholic Church was “renovated” in 1973 and the statutes and High Altar were removed.

http://www2.truman.edu/~adavis/mipages/mioldinterior.jpg
 
Guess I’ll be over there with the lame crowd. 👍
Hey if that’s your style than more power to ya:thumbsup:, but won’t make you more Catholic, it’s the faith one brings to the mass that makes one a good Catholic.
 
Very few veterans I knew (myself included) spoke of their wartime experiences, other than anecdotes that weren’t directly related to battle (or mopping up after it, which is what I as a nurse did.) My dad mentioned only a couple of things about Normandy, one of which was that Mass. Being in Latin, with the exception of the homily (which was of course in French,) he had no trouble understanding the Mass. And I’d be willing to bet the next mortgage payment that with Germans still in the area, his rifle and pack accompanied him to the communion rail! I know for a fact that he carried his rosary in his uniform jacket pocket, and a scapular around his neck.

Out of respect for him I never pressured him for war stories, since it seemed to be traumatizing in the retelling. He never joined any veterans’ organizations, and seemed to want to put it all behind him, as most guys in the front lines usually try to do. After he died in 2002 I did get a copy of his service record and was astonished to note how decorated he was for valor. All I have to go by is the writeups by officers in the field. The whole stories went to the grave with him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top