R
reggieM
Guest
I’ve been blessed to visit Rome a few times. Nothing confirms what you’ve said above like seeing the actual architectural sites where the Roman church was founded – or going to the tomb of St. Peter under the altar at the basilica, or visiting other early church sites.Now, if Peter was the bishop of Rome and founded the community there, it highly probably that his community would have known a great deal about the nature of the Church and what was to happen after Peter died (or was martyred, as was his case). Now, if after the death of Peter, someone unjustly usurped power, don’t you think that the Roman Christians would have jumped all over it? What about all of the other Christians in the world? Certainly they would have perceived a heretical assumption of power and authority. What about John the Apostle, who was still alive while at least three other popes were in place in Rome? Why would he still be silent?
Even under persecution, Peter was honored in Rome as the head of the Church. Certainly, Constantine knew that in the 3rd century when the persecutions were lifted – as he built the first version of St. Peter’s basilica.
Peter’s authority was universally accepted – both in the early church and then through the later centuries, even after the fall of Rome when there was much chaos. The Popes were recognized as the authority in the Christian church – as no one else was or claimed to be.