F
freesoulhope
Guest
Thats funny… i have never seen you write anything that shows the logic of the first cause arguement to be flawed. I have seen you write alot of assertions, but you have provided no arguement. A good arguement, is a claim to something being true, and then providing a logical arguement to back it up. The Thiest has shown through logical arguement that God is logically necessary, and the only challenges that have come back are one’s that are based on poor assumptions and false premises; the Athiestic arguements get so poor sometimes that they even try to challenge Logic itself, and introduce contradictions.I wouldn’t mind if you at least introduced an arguement that was flawed, but as far as i can see, you have given no arguements at all. At best, you make the claim that you have refuted the arguement, yet you provide no evidence.
You’re done showing flaws? I’m done to.
Peace.