What is this principle called

  • Thread starter Thread starter jesusmademe
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
J

jesusmademe

Guest
There is a principle I want to know the name of.
The Church has the Pope, the local Bishops, the local Priests. We see a heirarchy in how the Churh is governed. What is this principle called?
 
Last edited:
There is a principle I want to know the name of.
The Church has the Pope, the local Bishops, the local Priests. We see a heirarchy in how the Churh is governed. What is this principle called?
I don’t know if there is one specific name for what you’re referring to.

Apostolic succession refers to the succession of bishops and the conferring of the sacrament of holy orders.

The ministerial priesthood refers to the clergy.

The church has an “episcopal” polity structure, meaning local jurisdictions are run by bishops, and the church having a college of bishops, with priests being subordinate to bishops.

Papal primacy refers to the pope being first among bishops, while papal supremacy refers to his absolute jurisdiction administratively over the church.
 
Last edited:
I believe that would be subsidiarity. From the Modern Catholic Dictionary by Fr. John Hardon, S.J.†
SUBSIDIARITY. The principle by which those in authority recognize the rights of the members in a society; and those in higher authority respect the rights of those in lower authority.
 
There is a principle I want to know the name of.
The Church has the Pope, the local Bishops, the local Priests. We see a heirarchy in how the Churh is governed. What is this principle called?
Let’s not forget the laity.

Although generally conciliar in its governance, the Council of Chalcedon was further distinguished by the active leadership of Pope Leo I. His letter to the Patriarch of Constantinople, which was accepted by the assembled prelates as the authoritative expression of orthodoxy, establishes the importance of the bishop of Rome. By 451, the councils firmly established the institutional model of church by adapting the political model used by Rome.

Early Christianity developed a visible human organization, known as clergy, primarily to administer the sacraments. These successors to the twelve apostles came to be called bishops and, under their leadership, the Church grew organically for the first four centuries. Bishops and their helpers, presbyters and deacons, instructed and baptized the catechumens bringing them into the community. The new members in time catechized others and the movement grew at a natural geometric rate.

Emperor Theodosius name Christianity the imperial religion in 381. Theodosius’ action, however, accelerated Christianity’s growth rate (being Christian now had positive political consequences; not being Christian, negative consequences) beyond the organization’s ability to indoctrinate newcomers in the ordinary way. As a result, new members were poorly formed in the faith, and heresies resulted.

The Church, to protect its unity, responded by centralizing its authority. Ecumenical in their formation, but central in their governance, the early councils prototyped the preferred method, the conciliar method, for resolving attacks on the oneness of the Church. This new ecclesiology for projecting its authority emphasized the institutional model of Church and mimicked the political structure of the time, centralized Roman governance.
 
Early Christianity developed a visible human organization, known as clergy, primarily to administer the sacraments.
No this is just wrong. Christ Himself chose the Apostles to govern the Church. It was absolutely not some innovation of the early Church for administration or management’s sake.
 
Look at the lay-run communities - shipwrecks subject to the prevailing winds. Christ’s Church is not a democracy. OK, I’ve said enough.
 
No this is just wrong. Christ Himself chose the Apostles to govern the Church. It was absolutely not some innovation of the early Church for administration or management’s sake.
Yes, Christ did call the apostles. Tradition has the last apostle, John, dying in ~ 100 A.D. The successor bishops, the Apostolic Fathers, of the 1st and 2nd centuries were orthodox.

By the third century, the bishops were found wanting. And, after Theodosius’ action accelerated baptism without proper catechesis, “in the fourth they [the bishops] were the leaders of schisms, and heresies in the Meletian and Donatist troubles and in the long Arian struggle.”
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/06001a.htm#appeal

Christ promised His Holy Spirit would remain with His Church but the Church’s human element is ever in need of reformation.
 
I think the principle is simply called hierarchy or magisterium. In speaking of the Clery, the CCC has a section on The Hierarchical Constitution of the Church involving those in Holy Orders such as the Pope, bishops, other priests, and deacons who office it is to teach, sanctify, and govern the People of God.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top