0
0331
Guest
In short, yes.
Let’s go up the thread a bit:Not sure what point you think you’ve made…
But was that what God wanted? The answer is no. Blasphemy is in the Bible too, maybe that means God wants good devout Christians to blaspheme.So there isn’t polygamy, incest, and child marriage in the Bible?
I know gay married men who are great fathers and have happy, well adjusted children. But having a father doesn’t ensure anything. I’m lucky because I have a great father (and mother) who has always accepted and loved me unconditionally. However, a lot of gay men I know were not accepted by their fathers in particular and are not on good terms with their fathers as adults.You’re trolling me, right?
Maybe it is because this is a Catholic forum. Therefore, respect is given to Catholic teaching. If having parents at all is better than none, would the same apply to parents that are drug addicts? Those that work in sex industries? Those who have other grave sexual disorders?0331:![]()
It’s much more ideal than your plan. Having two opposite-sex parents doesn’t guarantee anything, so I don’t know why you’re so hung up on it.Nice gif. But sending children into families without both a father and a mother isn’t an ideal plan either.
It’s not a confrontational question. It’s a simple question that furthers discussion and I’m not sure why you are avoiding it.
Where do we disagree below?
Do you not agree with the accepted science that human beings require a man and woman to be ?
Maybe you don’t agree that it is good to exist? In that case I am sorry for you.
Let’s find some consensus.
Where do we disagree…
goout:![]()
OK sorry for the long cut and paste, but things won’t make sense without it I fear. You postulate the existence of something called ‘the good’. I am not sure what this is. I assume you mean ‘what God intends’. You then ask me if it is good to be alive. Well, it is good for me today. Were I to be a caterpillar doomed to be a living host for a wasp larvae life would be bad for me (but good for the wasp). Were I to be paralysed, conscious but unable to communicate and hooked up to machines on which my life depended it would not be good for me to be alive, for m, my family, or the people who needed the health resources I was consuming pointlessly.Here’s what morality is:
The evaluation of human acts in relation to the good.
The Catholic Church observes that it is good to be alive . Do you agree with that?
What is the one unique way human life happens? What is the one unique way that life flourishes?
On that basis, the Church simply observes what is revealed and proclaims it. If human life is good, and sacred, then shouldn’t we order our actions toward that good end? Is a gay union ordered in the same way toward that end as marriage? No. Do you assert otherwise?
It’s a very simple thing really, and doesn’t require a bunch of fancy scripture passages,and not one negative thing has to be said about gay people.
At the end of the day, it’s not about sexual prohibition or running others down, it’s about “the good” of human existence.
You ask about the ‘one way’ human life happens. Well the one way human life happens is that it is passed on generation to generation. It does not occur at the time of conception. Both sperm and ovum are alive. The Church does not teach that this human life is good in the way that mine is. Rather the Church has a concept of ‘individual’ humans, each the creation of God. I do not share that view. Without it all the talk of natural law and ‘ordering’ of human customs and instincts is without meaning. It flows from a premise I do not share. I have no objection to you holding it. But I do not think it reasonable to insist that I should hold it because it is apparent from what we observe. This is a long-stated Christian view, but it is not one I share. To my mind is is almost completely refuted in a positive sense by the absence of atheists who accept ‘natural law’ when it comes to the ‘ordering to the good’ of human sexuality.