M
Mirdath
Guest
Quite the opposite – I believe we are supremely responsible, and that we can’t pass the buck on to any deity or devil if such exist.So, just to clarify, it seems you do not believe that people are responsible for their actions and their choices?
As to the ‘life of the mother’ exception, I believe the Church invokes double effect for those, or at least some instances (such as ectopic pregnancies, where the fetus implants in the fallopian tubes). Surgery then is performed to save the mother, and as the primary goal is not the abortion of the fetus the Church considers it morally acceptable.
This is getting a little too close to argument territory.But isn’t this the important question? If the fetus is merely a fleshy appendage, then what business is it of the State to forbid the woman an abortion? On the other hand, if the fetus is a child–a human being living in her mother’s womb–then the State certainly has a right to protect that life, just as it acts to protect other lives. It seems that even under your understanding of the matter the State would have the right (and some, including me, would argue the obligation) to protect the fetus at least at the point it reaches viability outside of the womb.
