J
John_of_Patmos
Guest
Is it just entropy?
I really wish the Copts and the Catholics would get back together…
I really wish the Copts and the Catholics would get back together…
Are you aware that there is a Coptic Catholic Church?Is it just entropy?
I really wish the Copts and the Catholics would get back together…
Yeah, I was asking because I found the British Orthodox Church interesting.Are you aware that there is a Coptic Catholic Church?
British Orthodox Church? Never heard of it. Why would it make one think of the Copts?Yeah, I was asking because I found the British Orthodox Church interesting.
Also, are the Coptic catholic pretty similar to the Coptic Orthodox, or are they latinized?
The British Orthodox are a mission church under the Copts.British Orthodox Church? Never heard of it. Why would it make one think of the Copts?
Did you get the email I sent you?![]()
The problem with the Coptic Catholic church is that it was founded by RC missionaries, mostly Franciscan probably. They went in to convert Muslims and Copts to the Roman Catholic church.Are you aware that there is a Coptic Catholic Church?
Wow! I wasn’t aware of that. How sad, on the one hand that it was more a matter of “poaching” than reconciliation. But ironically how also happy that they were able to keep some souls within the Christian family.The problem with the Coptic Catholic church is that it was founded by RC missionaries, mostly Franciscan probably. They went in to convert Muslims and Copts to the Roman Catholic church.
Finding Muslims too hard to convince, they turned their efforts mainly on the local Christians of Egypt. Then finding this a tough sell, Latin Catholic priests adopted the Coptic liturgy in the villages in order to poach on the Coptic Orthodox (a tactic adopted in Ethiopia as well).
To their credit, these priests probably saved some villages from becoming completely Muslim, as the native church was shrinking and parishes had to be closed, the missioners were able to occupy and reopen some old Orthodox temples and gather a following among the few Christians left.
It was not anything like the Union of Brest nor the Melkite union. It was not a portion of the Coptic synod agreeing to submit to Rome. It was an entirely made to order church, and does not represent any kind of reconciliation attempt, it was more like a replacement attempt.
Agreed.Wow! I wasn’t aware of that. How sad, on the one hand that it was more a matter of “poaching” than reconciliation. But ironically how also happy that they were able to keep some souls within the Christian family.
In light of the information presented by Hesychios, I don’t know if “Latinized” is the right word to use, but they seem pretty different to me. With the caveat that I have never been to a Coptic Catholic Church (they are hard to find; it is a very, very small church), I must say that I am certainly less than impressed by what I have seen online. But here are two videos to compare for yourself:Also, are the Coptic catholic pretty similar to the Coptic Orthodox, or are they latinized?
Unfortunately, much more than “entropy” is at play. The Catholic and Oriental Orthodox Churches don’t see eye to eye on a number of issues. In the areas both of doctrine and discipline, several points of divergence can be given: the christology as expressed at the Council of Chalcedon*, the filioque, papal infallibility and universal jurisdiction, the immaculate conception of St. Mary, purgatory, indulgences, the mode of baptism, priestly celibacy, and fasting rules throughout the liturgical year.Is it just entropy?
I really wish the Copts and the Catholics would get back together…
I think one of the greatest problems is the sometimes nasty divisions between the different Orthodox state churches themselves.Is it just entropy?
I really wish the Copts and the Catholics would get back together…
What does that have to do with the Copts in particular?I think one of the greatest problems is the sometimes nasty divisions between the different Orthodox state churches themselves.
Indeed. The Copts are about as close to being a state church as Trebor135 is to being the king of Saudi Arabia.What does that have to do with the Copts in particular?![]()
You have to be profoundly ignorant of Christian history to look at the Oriental churches and accuse them of “ethnic” chauvinism (or whatever it means to call a church “ethnic”). The Coptic Church in particular has counted Romans, Syrians, Armenians, Ethiopians, Sudanese, Libyans, and others among its ranks, as laypersons, monastics, and even Popes (i.e., the “Coptic” Pope was not always ethnically Coptic). In addition to this, through the direct influence and teaching of the holy St. Athanasius the Apostolic during his two exiles in Western Europe and the spread of St. Antony’s monastic teachings and the others of the Desert Fathers, Coptic Christianity had a huge formative impact on Western Christianity. Other events recorded in the history of the church of Egypt also attest to pervasive Coptic influence on Christian practice in such far off locations as Switzerland, Britain, and Ireland.Indeed. The Copts are about as close to being a state church as Trebor135 is to being the king of Saudi Arabia.
Perhaps Caspar was referring to what may look like “ethnic churches” among the Oriental Orthodox.
St Leo and Chalcedone, and dioscorus and many other things. Good luck.What keeps Catholics and Oriental Orthodox apart?
You write like someone full of pre-conceived notions, like you have been reading a lot of Adrian Fortescue and David Armstrong or something like that.I think one of the greatest problems is the sometimes nasty divisions between the different Orthodox state churches themselves.
I was not accusing the Oriental Orthodox of being ethnically chauvinistic, having not looked into the history. (It has been delightful to see your YouTube links here and in other threads which indicate that Coptic Orthodoxy is spreading in such places as Fiji, however.) I was merely parsing what Caspar seemed to be driving at by his comment about “state churches”, without intending to signal agreement with it.You have to be profoundly ignorant of Christian history to look at the Oriental churches and accuse them of “ethnic” chauvinism (or whatever it means to call a church “ethnic”).