What make you think That Adam and Eve are real despite the evolutionary change or chance and widespread of the Neanderthals and Homosapians

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pathway2
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I was busy. Now I have more time for you 😏

It was likely Regional. Perhaps the Toba Catastrophe played a role…

If it was global it would require forcing all the water stored in the Earth’s crust towards the surface.

BoomBoomMancini said:
Because if you say regional, clearly you’re okay with reading the Bible with something besides 100% straightforward literalism. Yet you insist on a totally literal Genesis because you “believe the Bible.”

Surely you see the disconnect here.
Click to expand...
There’s no disconnect. I still believe the Bible. It describes a literal event. Whether the Flood was Regional or Global is a matter of debate.
 
Last edited:
The first self-replicating cell is a fantasy. Just as it was once believed that flies were born from dirty clothes.
 
Last edited:
Yes, it appears He did at times. He just let the Blind Watchmaker keep spitting out random life forms without plan or purpose.
 
But you clearly don’t believe that the Bible describes the event literally, or else you’d be saying “of course it was global, the Bible says so.” You’re implicitly acknowledging that not everything in the Bible is to be taken 100% literally.
Cruciferi said:
I was busy. Now I have more time for you 😏
Click to expand...
Hah, I appreciate it. You know how needy I am.
 
Last edited:
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
Proof of Random Life 🔝
 
So you’d agree something happened, but the Bible might just describe it allegorically. Am I getting that right? So when the Bible says Noah was 600, we should read that to mean “very old”, not literally six hundred years old.
 
Last edited:
I was taught Genesis records actual history. And since this is now open Season on Biblical Literalists, I object to the brow beating. If the Bible tells us 600 or 900 years, that’s exactly right.
 
Cruciferi said:
I don’t believe in a strict literal or allegorical interpretation. Everything is looked at separately
Click to expand...
I don’t think anyone believes _everything_is allegorical. Some things are clearly meant to be taken literally. I don’t understand why you insist on Genesis being literal, especially when the Catechism acknowledges it uses figurative language. We all agree God created the universe at some point. I’m just saying that it clearly wasn’t done literally according to the account in Genesis.
 
edwest211 said:
I was taught Genesis records actual history. And since this is now open Season on Biblical Literalists, I object to the brow beating. If the Bible tells us 600 or 900 years, that’s exactly right.
Click to expand...
I don’t care if you object. I’ve been very civil throughout, and I’m not holding a gun to his head to make him respond. He’s actually one of my favorite posters; just because i disagree with him doesn’t mean I dislike him personally.

Spare me your high horse indignation.
 
It would only have to reach Mt. Ararat. If they would allow Ice Penetrating radar, we could solve this problem next week.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top