What make you think That Adam and Eve are real despite the evolutionary change or chance and widespread of the Neanderthals and Homosapians

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pathway2
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
"Adam and Eve: Real People

"It is equally impermissible to dismiss the story of Adam and Eve and the fall (Gen. 2–3) as a fiction. A question often raised in this context is whether the human race descended from an original pair of two human beings (a teaching known as monogenism) or a pool of early human couples (a teaching known as polygenism).

"In this regard, Pope Pius XII stated: “When, however, there is question of another conjectural opinion, namely polygenism, the children of the Church by no means enjoy such liberty. For the faithful cannot embrace that opinion which maintains either that after Adam there existed on this earth true men who did not take their origin through natural generation from him as from the first parents of all, or that Adam represents a certain number of first parents. Now, it is in no way apparent how such an opinion can be reconciled that which the sources of revealed truth and the documents of the teaching authority of the Church proposed with regard to original sin which proceeds from a sin actually committed by an individual Adam in which through generation is passed onto all and is in everyone as his own” ( Humani Generis 37).

"The story of the creation and fall of man is a true one, even if not written entirely according to modern literary techniques. The Catechism states, “The account of the fall in Genesis 3 uses figurative language, but affirms a primeval event, a deed that took place at the beginning of the history of man. Revelation gives us the certainty of faith that the whole of human history is marked by the original fault freely committed by our first parents” (CCC 390).
  • Catholic Answers
 
That story is similar to the story of Adam and Eve. The point of the story is not that a man named Adam and a woman named Eve lived in a garden in Iraq. Rather, conscience, sin, free will and suffering are the focus of the story, not the historical details.
So Adam and Eve were not real, live historical individuals? Many children are told fairy tales as they are growing up. We have Grimm;s fairy tales and we have La Fontaine. The historical details are irrelevant. rather the important part of the fairy tale is to portray some aspect of life worth considering. It seems that you are saying that the story of Adam and Eve is a myth or similar to a fairy tale.
 
It seems that you are saying that the story of Adam and Eve is a myth or similar to a fairy tale.
There is some truth to that, though I would not use that language. “Fairy tale” has long been used with enlightenment era prejudice against anything immaterial. Such secular minimalism has long made the spiritual life difficult.
 
Hmmmm. One has to know why.
It would seem to me that one need only know that it’s not canonical; knowing why is kinda irrelevant at that point, no?
But it does contain many truths in it.
I’m not saying that the Bible is the only book that contains truth. But, I am saying that, as Christians, we believe that the Bible is the only book that contains divinely revealed truth! (Not to denigrate Apostolic Teaching, of course. 😉 )
 
Your sarcasm dedacts any valid points your trying to put forth. Im struggling to make sense of your reply but perhaps this helps.

The laws of physics guide. I did not say govern or dictate. If there were no such laws as aerodynamics then wings would be pointless.
 
So if you drop me and my offspring from a plane repeatedly we’ll grow wings?
This is a serious misinterpretation of the evolutionary process. Perhaps it would help your understanding if you took a course such as Biology 101 or read a few books on evolution such as
Evolution by Daniel Loxton
Why evolution is true by Jerry Coyne
 
Well, I believe that life is translated and planted on Earth. Elijah and Enoch are proof that this is possible.
 
Jerry Coyne is just a promoter. I don’t find his other writings to be balanced.
 
What makes me think they are real, nothing. As I was taught in Catholic school most of the early parts of Genesis are allegory, not history.
 
Scripture and Church tradition inform us that from Adam on, the Scriptures provide a literal history of early mankind. That means humans haven’t been around for hundreds of thousands of years as per the fable of evolution, but have been around for only 6000-10000 years (although the earliest forms of life were created millions of years ago).
 
Last edited:
In response to the OP, Catholics are not required to follow a literal interpretation of all things contained in the Bible (unlike some Christians).
The Catholic Church teaches that scripture alone does not provide the fullness of Truth, it must be informed by Sacred Tradition while also taking into account other information (historical context, science, etc.)

Personally, I subscribe to a theory which was presented to me by a very wise Catholic priest (and anthropology professor) while I was in university: at some point in the physical development of what we now call “humans”, God chose to impart a soul.

This theory allows for belief in both the biblical account of Adam and Eve as well as the fossil record.
 
"Adam and Eve: Real People

"It is equally impermissible to dismiss the story of Adam and Eve and the fall (Gen. 2–3) as a fiction. A question often raised in this context is whether the human race descended from an original pair of two human beings (a teaching known as monogenism) or a pool of early human couples (a teaching known as polygenism).

"In this regard, Pope Pius XII stated: “When, however, there is question of another conjectural opinion, namely polygenism, the children of the Church by no means enjoy such liberty. For the faithful cannot embrace that opinion which maintains either that after Adam there existed on this earth true men who did not take their origin through natural generation from him as from the first parents of all, or that Adam represents a certain number of first parents. Now, it is in no way apparent how such an opinion can be reconciled that which the sources of revealed truth and the documents of the teaching authority of the Church proposed with regard to original sin which proceeds from a sin actually committed by an individual Adam in which through generation is passed onto all and is in everyone as his own” ( Humani Generis 37).

“The story of the creation and fall of man is a true one, even if not written entirely according to modern literary techniques. The Catechism states, “The account of the fall in Genesis 3 uses figurative language, but affirms a primeval event, a deed that took place at the beginning of the history of man. Revelation gives us the certainty of faith that the whole of human history is marked by the original fault freely committed by our first parents” (CCC 390).”
  • Catholic Answers
 
There is no scientific basis for this. There is no Scriptural basis for this.
 
So basically Pius would argue that Catholics can’t believe in Adam and Eve being allegory… Someone might want to tell Catholic educators that. Because that’s not being taught in at least two Jesuit institutions I attended.

Though I can see why he’d defend their existence from a Catholic POV. No Adam and Eve, no original sin.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top