What makes Peter's keys that he received in Matthew 16 different from the ones the apostles received in Matthew 18?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Guest1

New member
Does it have to do with you are Peter and on this rock I will build my Church ?

Any early Church fathers quotes on this subject?

Or Church teachings?
 
Last edited:
No key was given in Matt 18, no rock was mentioned, no name was changed. The key points to a passage in Isaiah 22:22 about the appointment of a person to run the kingdom with the authority of the king. That person would be a father(pope) to the people. The context of Matt 18 is not the same.
 
As stated above, the difference was the keys. No keys in Mt 18. In Mt 16, the Keys to the Kingdom are given to Peter, and Peter alone. (In a similar way, you will notice that Peter, alone, is told to be the strength of his brothers in Lk 22:31-32. And in John 21:15-17, Peter, and him alone, is charged with the care of the flock on earth.)
There are plenty of Early Church Father quotes on the topic, and ample Church teachings. Here are just a few (also contains other info about Peter unrelated to your question):

http://daves-ahumbleservant.blogspot.com/search/label/Primacy
http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/p123a9p4.htm#880
 
Last edited:
The “you” in Matthew 16 is second person singular; the “you” in Matthew 18 is second person plural. Matthew 16 refers to an individual charism that Peter could exercise independently; perhaps Matthew 18 refers to a collective charism that could only be exercised by the other apostles as a group, collectively, with Peter’s approval.
 
As others have noted St Peter was given the keys in a special and singular manner. The other Apostles were given the same power to bind and to loose in Matthew 18, but the keys are not referenced in this passage. The bishops as a whole DO exercise divinely granted authority and the bishops receive that authority from Christ Himself, but Peter’s successors exercise unique authority.
 
The Papacy
http://www.americancatholictruthsociety.com/docs/ecfpapacy.htm
What did the Early Church Fathers Say?
St. Irenaeus
“The blessed apostles [Peter and Paul], having founded and built up the church [of Rome] . . . handed over the office of the episcopate to Linus” (Against Heresies 3:3:3 [A.D. 189]).
Tertullian

“[T]his is the way in which the apostolic churches transmit their lists: like the church of the Smyrneans, which records that Polycarp was placed there by John, like the church of the Romans, where Clement was ordained by Peter” (Demurrer Against the Heretics 32:2 [A.D. 200]).
The Little Labyrinth
“Victor . . . was the thirteenth bishop of Rome from Peter” (The Little Labyrinth [A.D. 211], in Eusebius, Church History 5:28:3).
Cyprian of Carthage
“The Lord says to Peter: ‘I say to you,’ he says, ‘that you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my Church, and the gates of hell will not overcome it. . . . ’ [Matt. 16:18]. On him [Peter] he builds the Church, and to him he gives the command to feed the sheep [John 21:17], and although he assigns a like power to all the apostles, yet he founded a single chair [cathedra], and he established by his own authority a source and an intrinsic reason for that unity. . . . If someone [today] does not hold fast to this unity of Peter, can he imagine that he still holds the faith? If he [should] desert the chair of Peter upon whom the Church was built, can he still be confident that he is in the Church?” (The Unity of the Catholic Church 4; first edition [A.D. 251]).
.
"With a false bishop appointed for themselves by heretics, they dare even to set sail and carry

“Paul testifies that Crescens was sent to Gaul [2 Tim. 4:10], but Linus, whom he mentions in the Second Epistle to Timothy [2 Tim. 4:21] as his companion at Rome, was Peter’s successor in the episcopate of the church there, as has already been shown. Clement also, who was appointed third bishop of the church at Rome, was, as Paul testifies, his co-laborer and fellow-soldier [Phil. 4:3]” (Church History 3:4:9–10 [A.D. 312]).

Council of Sardica

“You cannot deny that you are aware that in the city of Rome the episcopal chair was given first to Peter; the chair in which Peter sat, the same who was head—that is why he is also called Cephas [‘Rock’]—of all the apostles; the one chair in which unity is maintained by all” (The Schism of the Donatists 2:2 [A.D. 367]).

St. Jerome
“[Pope] Stephen . . . was the blessed Peter’s twenty-second successor in the See of Rome” (Against the Luciferians 23 [A.D. 383]).

“Clement, of whom the apostle Paul writing to the Philippians says ‘With Clement and others of my fellow-workers whose names are written in the book of life,’ the fourth bishop of Rome after Peter, if indeed the second was Linus and the third Anacletus, although most of the Latins think that Clement was second after the apostle” (Lives of Illustrious Men 15 [A.D. 396]).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top