What Muslims are taught in their mosques - unbiased

  • Thread starter Thread starter famdigy
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
In my opinion, a lot of things that get labelled acts of Islamic terrorism are really acts of political terrorism committed by people who happen to be Islamic. I think that is the case with the majority of the suicide bombings in Iraq as they are Muslim on Muslim crimes, not intended to defend Islam or advance the Islamic cause in the world, but purely for a groups own political goals.

Now bin Laden is definitely an Islamic terrorist, as was the Intifada and its succeeding manifestations. And admittedly sometimes when dealing with Islam one cannot really distinguish between a poltical and a religious motivation for they are so mixed together as one. But I do think that Beslan was an act of political terrorism committed by people who saw themselves primarily as fighting for a Chechen, not Muslim, cause.
Then why don’t we hear of Christian suicide bombers attacking other Christians? You can substitute Buddhist, Hindu or almost anyother religion except Islam into the above phrase. It looks like and Islamist thing. Islam is as Islam does.
 
Then why don’t we hear of Christian suicide bombers attacking other Christians? You can substitute Buddhist, Hindu or almost anyother religion except Islam into the above phrase. It looks like and Islamist thing. Islam is as Islam does.
Two words: Tamil Tigers.

They invented the suicide vest, and used terror against Muslims in Sri Lanka.

And there are Christian examples of using suicide as a weapon of war. Most notably, from the time of the Crusades, when the Knights Templar destroyed one of their own ships, killing 140 Christians in order to kill ten times as many Muslims.
 
Then why don’t we hear of Christian suicide bombers attacking other Christians? You can substitute Buddhist, Hindu or almost anyother religion except Islam into the above phrase. It looks like and Islamist thing. Islam is as Islam does.
Because you don’t read news from other parts of the world. That’s really about the only way you can fail to hear of terrorism, including suicide attacks, by non-Muslims.
 
It seems that Africa and Indian sub-Continent are not free from Islamic terrism either.

8/27/07 Thailand Pattani A female teacher is murdered by Muslim radicals in front of her school.
8/26/07 Pakistan Swat A suicide bomber kills four Pakistanis at a checkpoint.
8/26/07 Pakistan Bajaur A 40-year-old civilian is shot to death by Taliban extremists.
8/26/07 Iraq Mahmudiyah Sunni terrorists kill a child in a mortar attack.
8/26/07 Iraq Baghdad A female pilgrim and several children are among Shias targeted by radical Sunnis, as a dozen people are killed.
8/26/07 Somalia Mogadishu Two young boys and an adult are killed by a bomb planted in a school yard.
8/26/07 Thailand Yala Two rubber tappers are murdered by Islamic radicals while on their way to work.
8/26/07 Somalia Mogadishu Two people are killed in separate grenade attacks by Islamic extremists.
This is a classic mistake: Your list includes terror campaigns undertaken by Muslims, but that have absolutely nothing to do with religious disputes.

There is no great theological mission in Thailand, Iraq, or Somalia. There isn’t even a pretense of one. But you include that in a list of “Islamic terror” because it was perpertrated by Muslims.

By that reasoning, the violence in the Congo and Rwanda should “prove” that Christianity is more bloody than Islam. After all, there are murder campaigns carried out by Christians in those places. But I don’t think you want to conclude that.

If you limit the list to terrorism related to theological or religious goals, then your list of Islamic and Christian terrorism shrinks dramatically, and becomes quite comparable.
 
Well, I am obviously in the minority on this thread and am convincing no one as we are all each already convinced of our own truth. But who here has actually sat in a mosque and listened to the teaching there? When you start sharing with me those experiences, maybe I’ll believe the rabid views of Islam that are being expressed here. I have, and what I have heard is not what you are claiming is being preached.
I exhausted myself on a mission to convince people that Muslims are human beings on this forum in the past.

You are making clearly logical, moderate statements about the religion. You have obviously made an effort to seek out sources of information that will give you an insight into what Muslims believe, rather than turning to the likes of Daniel Pipes. I think this is what anyone who sincerely wants the truth will do to learn about another religion.

Unfortunately, it looks like most people aren’t interested in learning-they just want to “teach everyone else about the threat.”

It’s a depressing venture you’ve taken on here, and you’re to be commended for carrying it out so well and with so much energy.
 
Then why don’t we hear of Christian suicide bombers attacking other Christians? You can substitute Buddhist, Hindu or almost anyother religion except Islam into the above phrase. It looks like and Islamist thing. Islam is as Islam does.
The Tamil Tigers do the same thing
 
The Tamil Tigers do the same thing
They don’t do the same thing. They aren’t doing for their God(s). Furthermore it’s a tu quoque.

The differentiation which Islamo-apologists always ignore is that their prophet called for jihad and taught that doctrine in the Quran. Nothing about Christianity or Hinduism comes close. But then - it won’t stop these apologists coming up with the same tu quoques all over again.
 
Grace Seeker:
who here has actually sat in a mosque and listened to the teaching there? When you start sharing with me those experiences, maybe I’ll believe the rabid views of Islam that are being expressed here.
Read the Quran - the rabid views of Islam are expressed there. Read the hadiths - the rabid views of Islam are expressed there too.
 
Do you know if the Tamil Tigers actually use religious justifications for their violence?
They mostly do not.
Thats history. Christianity had changed a lot for the better since then.
The fact that something is history doesn’t make it irrelevant. And in modern times, there are plenty of Christian locales of strife: Look at what Russia did to Chechnya, what the Serbs did in Bosnia, and what the various factions did in Central America over the past 20 years.

Just in terms of number of people killed, it’s indisputable that Christian-majority countries have outdone Muslim terrorists literally by the millions.
 
But I do think that Beslan was an act of political terrorism committed by people who saw themselves primarily as fighting for a Chechen, not Muslim, cause.
But they are targeting 1000 innocent Christian school children? Those are the targets of these brave Muslim fighters?
 
But they are targeting 1000 innocent Christian school children? Those are the targets of these brave Muslim fighters?
Where are your words of condemnation for the (Mostly Christian) Russian army that killed tens of thousands of Chechen children?

Do you find it hard to predict that Chechens would do such things considering that their cities have been emptied and that they’ve literally hundreds of thousands of lives to a Russian invasion?
 
Where are your words of condemnation for the (Mostly Christian) Russian army that killed tens of thousands of Chechen children?

Do you find it hard to predict that Chechens would do such things considering that their cities have been emptied and that they’ve literally hundreds of thousands of lives to a Russian invasion?
Can you give a reference for that please. Were the Russian soldiers taking over schools and targeting unarmed school children while they are attending school, like these brave Muslim fighters were doing?
 
Can you give a reference for that please. Were the Russian soldiers taking over schools and targeting unarmed school children while they are attending school, like these brave Muslim fighters were doing?
They did worse-they just bombed entire cities into oblivion, shot caravans of fleeing civilians, and tortured and/or killed every prisoner they got their hands on…

This of course, after Russia invaded Chechnya. Note that Chechnya did not invade and claim as its own all of Russia.

Here’s a report by Human Rights Watch:
hrw.org/english/docs/2000/03/01/russia11094.htm
The bombing campaign has turned many parts of Chechnya to a wasteland: even the most experienced war reporters I have spoken to told me they have never seen anything in their careers like the destruction of the capital Grozny.
Human Rights Watch has now documented three large-scale massacres by Russian forces in Chechnya. In December, Russian troops killed seventeen civilians in the village of Alkhan-Yurt while going on a looting spree, burning many of the remaining homes and raping several women. We have documented at least fifty murders, mostly of older men and women, by Russian soldiers in the Staropromyslovski district of Grozny since Russian forces took control of that district: innocent civilians shot to death in their homes and their yards. In one case, three generations of the Zubayev family were shot to death in the yard of their home.
Even though you were quick to hop on the Chechen war crimes…you didn’t notice about what the (Mostly Christian) Russian forces did.

Why do you think that is?
 
Violence Is A Human, Not An Islamic Trait
By: Hussein Ibish*
The Philadelphia Inquirer ( 1 February 2004 )

The idea that Islam, and by extension Muslims, are inherently violent and irrational has become commonplace in our culture.

This misperception, with deep origins in the historical rivalry between Christian Europe and the Muslim Middle East, was intensified by the Arab-Israeli conflict and a slew of bigoted Hollywood movies, and gained a solid foothold in the minds of many Americans after 9/11.

Since 9/11, right-wing evangelical preachers such as Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell, and commentators such as Robert Spencer and Daniel Pipes, have spared no effort to spread fear and hatred of Islam and the growing American Muslim community.

This defamation probably has its greatest parallel in the anti-Semitic ideas that took hold in American culture between the First and Second World Wars. The charges directed against the American Jewish community - now eerily echoed by anti-Muslim rhetoric - smeared a religious minority as dangerous and subversive aliens. The Father Coughlins and Henry Fords of that era, and ours, found the political space to promote prejudice yet remain “respectable.”

Certainly the 19 hijackers responsible for the carnage of 9/11 saw themselves as Muslims. But so, of course, did about 300 of their victims. And it is true that the United States faces a threat from al-Qaeda and like-minded organizations. But so, of course, does the entire Arab and Islamic world, in which almost all governments and most people are committed to the war against al-Qaeda, and which is home to most of the victims of such fanaticism.

Some point to the glories of Muslim Spain, the notable tolerance and multiculturalism of the Ottoman Empire, or the relative peacefulness of the Islamic world over the past millennium compared to Christian Europe to make the case that Islam is essentially an agent of peace.

The more complex truth is that the Islamic world, at present and historically, is composed of a vast constellation of human beliefs, experiences and endeavors - a dizzying multiplicity, not a monolith. Like all great civilizations and cultures, those of the Islamic world have produced more than enough of the good to demand the highest respect, and enough of the bad to prohibit any complacency or chauvinism on the part of Muslims.

More than 1.3 billion people are Muslims, constituting about one fifth of humanity. Hence, the entire range of human experience and orientation can be readily found among them.

The Nigerian novelist Chinua Achebe said simply that “Africa is people.” So is the Islamic world. Not better or worse, villain or victim, but simply people. Violence, extremism and intolerance are universal human failings. They certainly are not particular to any culture or faith.
  • Hussein Ibish is communications director for the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee
===================================================================
 
In December, Russian troops killed seventeen civilians in the village of Alkhan-Yurt while going on a looting spree…
This is bad, but not as horrific and not the same as going into a grammar school and targeting 1200 Christian schoolchildren, the way that these brave Islamic fighters did at Beslan.
 
Violence Is A Human, Not An Islamic Trait
It is, unfortunately, not that simple. Violence is indeed a human trait, but religions promote or restrain violence in various ways. All religions are not the same, and Muhammad’s own use of violence (and the reflection of this in the Qur’an) has clearly had a significant effect on the Islamic tradition.

Edwin
 
I exhausted myself on a mission to convince people that Muslims are human beings on this forum in the past.
I know many decent and good Muslims. I am sure that there are many millions of decent Muslim men and women. And I certainly admire the Muslim women as they dress modestly and appear to cherish family life and many children.
What bothers me terribly is why we see Muslim fighters targeting 1200 innocent school children as they did in Beslan. Where is the outrage?
 
I know many decent and good Muslims. I am sure that there are many millions of decent Muslim men and women. And I certainly admire the Muslim women as they dress modestly and appear to cherish family life and many children.
What bothers me terribly is why we see Muslim fighters targeting 1200 innocent school children as they did in Beslan. Where is the outrage?
Considering how you just dismissed reports of whole towns being burned, raped, and murdered, including old women and young children…

Where is your outrage? What I find outrageous is that you can look at a report of acts just as vile and criminal, and also larger in scope, but then turn around and say “eh…it wasn’t that bad compared to one attack on a school.”
 
It is, unfortunately, not that simple. Violence is indeed a human trait, but religions promote or restrain violence in various ways. All religions are not the same, and Muhammad’s own use of violence (and the reflection of this in the Qur’an) has clearly had a significant effect on the Islamic tradition.

Edwin
What is your view of the distinction between Islamic traditions concerning violence, and Christian ones?

Historically, it appears that the two faiths have developed quite similar norms concerning warfare and violence. So what would you say are the relevant differences in this regard between Islam and Christianity?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top