K
kaycee
Guest
Testimony from Gods Chosen people the Jews, Jesus and the Apostles.What is the basis upon which you accept the Bible as true?
Testimony from Gods Chosen people the Jews, Jesus and the Apostles.What is the basis upon which you accept the Bible as true?
Which of these groups and/or individuals specified which books belong in the Bible?Testimony from Gods Chosen people the Jews, Jesus and the Apostles.
Dj,It is notable that this is a Protestant’s opinion (Thanks for being honest with us, MFM!). I find the use of the word ‘opinion’ particularly interesting, considering that God promised to send the Holy Spirit to guide us into all truth, and clearly, truth isn’t dependent on our opinion of it.
God specified and the groups just received them.Which of these groups and/or individuals specified which books belong in the Bible?
How did the groups recieve them from God and who were the groups?God specified and the groups just received them.
Moses came down from the mountain with the 10 commandments, gave them the first 5 books, etc, the Law and the prophets.How did the groups recieve them from God and who were the groups?
What must I do to be saved?
Jesus said to the Apostles in Mk 16:15-16 to go out & preach the Gospel to all creation and that he who would believe AND be baptized would be saved, and he who would not believe would be condemned.What are the minimal requirements?
I’m not asking “minimal requirements” to try to circumvent anything, simply, what do you believe the gospel teaches us regarding the above questions.
Fine… we agree (mostly) on the Old Testament.Moses came down from the mountain with the 10 commandments, gave them the first 5 books, etc, the Law and the prophets.
The apostles wrote them down, but they wrote down lots of other things that weren’t included in the Bible. Why does the New Testament contain what it does today, and how do you know it contains only what it should, and all of what it should?Jesus quoted from all the OT books. The Apostles wrote down the Gospels and the Epistles and passed them around to all the churches.
Simon, tons of people make the claim that they are guided in all necessary truths by the Holy Spirit. Those same people claim also to be guided to a true interpretation of scripture by the Holy Spirit. Where do you turn when two Spirit-guided Christians come to different conclusions about what the Bible says, and what constitutes necessary truth? In other words, how does one determine which of these multifarious Protestant opinions is the correct one?Dj,
Thanks but I put “my opinion” out of respect for you guys, and the fact that you all allow fundies like me to be here on this forum…
I am guided in all necessary truths by the Holy Spirit.
Simon
Which example of Christ?Have you ever tried a Novena?
I have friends who have asked God repeatedly for direction. It was not until they followed the example that Christ gave that their answer finally became clear. And then it was extremely clear and they could “see” where God had been talking to them all along.
Your sister in Christ,
Maria
Speculation prompted by your theological needs I would say…If God can form the universe out of nothing God can keep his Word straight in spite of humans. <><
Acts 16:29 The jailer called for lights, rushed in and fell trembling before Paul and Silas. 30 He then brought them out and asked, “Sirs, what must I do to be saved?” 31 They replied, “Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved–you and your household.”Originally Posted by gracelife
What must I do to be saved?
A certain ruler asked him, “Good teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?” “Why do you call me good?” Jesus answered. “No one is good—except God alone. You know the commandments: ‘Do not commit adultery, do not murder, do not steal, do not give false testimony, honor your father and mother.’”Acts 16:29 The jailer called for lights, rushed in and fell trembling before Paul and Silas. 30 He then brought them out and asked, “Sirs, what must I do to be saved?” 31 They replied, “Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved–you and your household.”
He said to them, "Go into all the world and preach the good news to all creation. Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned. (Mark 16:15-16, NIV)Acts 16:29 The jailer called for lights, rushed in and fell trembling before Paul and Silas. 30 He then brought them out and asked, “Sirs, what must I do to be saved?” 31 They replied, “Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved–you and your household.”
What good is it, my brothers, if a man claims to have faith but has no deeds? Can such faith save him? Suppose a brother or sister is without clothes and daily food. If one of you says to him, “Go, I wish you well; keep warm and well fed,” but does nothing about his physical needs, what good is it? In the same way, faith by itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead. But someone will say, “You have faith; I have deeds.”Acts 16:29 The jailer called for lights, rushed in and fell trembling before Paul and Silas. 30 He then brought them out and asked, “Sirs, what must I do to be saved?” 31 They replied, “Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved–you and your household.”
God guided the OT saints and the NT saints in recognizing His Word. “My sheep hear my voice and they follow Me”Fine… we agree (mostly) on the Old Testament.
The apostles wrote them down, but they wrote down lots of other things that weren’t included in the Bible. Why does the New Testament contain what it does today, and how do you know it contains only what it should, and all of what it should?
How do you know that only what is written down as the New Testament was being passed around to all the churches?
From the earliest times a substantial part of the New Testament was available to the believers. The four Gospels were known and read in the Churches. The letters of Apostles Paul and Peter were circulated and used even while the Apostles lived. These New Testament books did not become authoritative because they were being formally accepted as Scripture by any church or group of churches but rather because the believers received them as inspired, recognizing in their Apostolic authority the very Word of God. The only questionable books being Jude, 2 Pet, Johns 3 epistles and Hebrews.When did the New Testament as you know it come into being, and what process was followed to compile it as such?
Do all Catholics keep all the commandments? Do all Catholics sell everything they have and give to the poor? How many will have treasure in Heaven?A certain ruler asked him, “Good teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?” “Why do you call me good?” Jesus answered. “No one is good—except God alone. You know the commandments: ‘Do not commit adultery, do not murder, do not steal, do not give false testimony, honor your father and mother.’”
“All these I have kept since I was a boy,” he said.
When Jesus heard this, he said to him, “You still lack one thing. Sell everything you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me.”
When he heard this, he became very sad, because he was a man of great wealth. Jesus looked at him and said, “How hard it is for the rich to enter the kingdom of God! Indeed, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.” (Luke 18:18-25, NIV)
Who were those New Testament saints who recognized His Word and compiled it into the New Testament? And why do you trust that what they did is correct?God guided the OT saints and the NT saints in recognizing His Word. “My sheep hear my voice and they follow Me”
I notice that you said that portions of the New Testament were circulated amongst the churches while the apostles lived, but not every church had every portion that every other church had. In other words, not every church had the entire New Testament, and were therefore lacking the fullness of revelation. Unless, of course, you believe in an authoritative body of lived, oral tradition.From the earliest times a substantial part of the New Testament was available to the believers. The four Gospels were known and read in the Churches. The letters of Apostles Paul and Peter were circulated and used even while the Apostles lived. These New Testament books did not become authoritative because they were being formally accepted as Scripture by any church or group of churches but rather because the believers received them as inspired, recognizing in their Apostolic authority the very Word of God. The only questionable books being Jude, 2 Pet, Johns 3 epistles and Hebrews.