M
Mickey
Guest
It seems you have trouble differentiating between original sin and actual sin.Why do they all say SINLESS?
You can’t be sinless and be full of grace I am sorry.
It seems you have trouble differentiating between original sin and actual sin.Why do they all say SINLESS?
You can’t be sinless and be full of grace I am sorry.
Nope.Ambrose believed in IC.
=Mickey;8115090]He is a doctor of your Church.
Here is another:
"Certainly Mary was conceived with original sin, as is natural. . . . If she
would not have been born with original sin, she would not have needed to be
redeemed by Christ, and, this being so, Christ would not be the universal
Redeemer of men, which would abolish the dignity of Christ."
Chapter CCXXXII bis. Thomas Aquinas, Compendio do Teologia[/FONT***]*
God can also allow the Virgin Mary to be born with original sin like the rest of humanity so that His Son can redeem our human nature in all its falleness and still give Our Lady the grace to not sin during her entire lifetime.
God can do anything. But He allows us to retain our free will.
The IC was not taught in the early Church or early Church councils or the early Church fathers. The question that should be asked is: Why did the Roman Catholic Church elevate this theologoumena to the level of doctrine. Very strange.
Hi Mickey, can you be more precise on where I can find this T. A. quote. It seems COMPLETELY out of character from what I have read. Also I’m not sure these are actually your views Mickey; or your comments on them?
Trying to apply human reason to sublime mysteries is NEVER going to result in TRUTH and right understanding. We are not gods nor does God think as we do. [Isa.55: 7-8]. Consider carefully these [passages] Isa.29: 16 ” You turn things upside down! Shall the potter be regarded as the clay; that the thing made should say of its maker, “He did not make me”; or the thing formed say of him who formed it, “He has no understanding”? … Isa.45: 9 "Woe to him who strives with his Maker, an earthen vessel with the potter! Does the clay say to him who fashions it,What are you making'? orYour work has no handles’?” … Isa.64: 8 “Yet, O LORD, thou art our Father; we are the clay, and thou art our potter; we are all the work of thy hand.”
MARY HAD TO BE CONCEIVED AND BORN W/O ANY SIN [ORIGINAL INCLUDED] IN ORDER TO BE THE MOTHER OF A PERFECT GOD: MADE MAN. God neither COULD nor would allow Jesus to be born of a SINFUL women. IMPOSSIBLE! Can God this? OF COURSE GOD CAN.
Christ is Mary’s Savior in a totally unique, necessary and mysterious manner. Christ is [was] Mary’s savior BEFORE Mary herself was conceived and Jesus was born. Remember to God TIME DOES NOT EXIST. “God is the Alpha and Omega,” always was; Is, and shall always be. It is God [Jesus the second Person of the Trinity] that all salvation flows. Because God choose to become human and remain God; God who KNOWS ALL, Saved Mary before; NOT after as it was then already completed per God’s Will.
A Perfect God simply cannot be born form an imperfect mother. CANNOT.
God Bless,
Pat
These discussions can tend to go round and round. People become weary. It does not mean that they concede. Also, it can get tedious to respond to so many posts because non-Roman Catholics are vastly out-numbered here.I’m still sorting through the issue of the IC, myself.
I will say that usually when someone threatens to walk mid-discussion; it means they can’t support their claims. That may not be the case with you; but it will appear that way if you don’t see it through.
=Mickey;He is a doctor of your Church.
"Certainly Mary was conceived with original sin, as is natural. . . . If she
would not have been born with original sin, she would not have needed to be
redeemed by Christ, and, this being so, Christ would not be the universal
Redeemer of men, which would abolish the dignity of Christ."
Chapter CCXXXII bis. Thomas Aquinas, Compendio do Teologia
God can also allow the Virgin Mary to be born with original sin like the rest of humanity so that His Son can redeem our human nature in all its falleness and still give Our Lady the grace to not sin during her entire lifetime.
Hi Mickey, can you be more precise on where I can find this T. A. quote. It seems COMPLETELY out of character from what I have read. Also I’m not sure these are actually your views Mickey; or your comments on them?God can do anything. But He allows us to retain our free will.
The IC was not taught in the early Church or early Church councils or the early Church fathers. The question that should be asked is: Why did the Roman Catholic Church elevate this theologoumena to the level of doctrine. Very strange.
What are you making'? or Your work has no handles’?” … Isa.64: 8 “Yet, O LORD, thou art our Father; we are the clay, and thou art our potter; we are all the work of thy hand.”I had the quote in my files from long ago. I do not own the compendium. However, I am aware that Thomas at first believed in the IC…and then did not for almost 20 years…and then did again. It shows that even post schism RC theologians and doctors could not come to terms with this innovation.Hi Mickey, can you be more precise on where I can find this T. A. quote. It seems COMPLETELY out of character from what I have read.
So says the post schism 19th century church of Rome…without support from the great councils, Early Church Fathers, or Sacred Scripture.It was made a Dogma because such are Inspired and Direct by the Holy Spirit.
I am well aware of the submission that you must show to the Pope.Thomas was not; is not POPE and does not have the same level of GRACE, Guidance and Prptection given to our Popes.
Okay Mickey let me explain it to you.It seems you have trouble differentiating between original sin and actual sin.
![]()
No Mick it just shows how it took time for this truth to be explained. And it took the Church which is the pillar of truth to do so.I had the quote in my files from long ago. I do not own the compendium. However, I am aware that Thomas at first believed in the IC…and then did not for almost 20 years…and then did again. It shows that even post schism RC theologians and doctors could not come to terms with this innovation.
“The Blessed Virgin did indeed contract original sin.”
[Thomas Aquinas *Summa theologiae IIIa, q. 27, a. 2, ad 2]
Explained?No Mick it just shows how it took time for this truth to be explained.
That’s the point. There is not evidence of this doctrine in the early undivided Church. No evidence with the great councils. No patristic evidence. No evidence in Sacred Scripture. … then the post schism Roman Church decides to make it a doctrine in the 19th century?And it took the Church which is the pillar of truth to do so.
No…it has not always been accepted.But it is the truth, has always been believed because its the truth.
It has nothing to do with understanding.But Mickey just because people have a difficult time understanding something does not mean its not true.
Hi rinnie,Okay Mickey let me explain it to you.
Original sin is the sin that we have because Of the sin of Adam and Eve. WE are born with it, It is wiped away at our BAPTISM. We usually do not have ACTUAL sin because we are about 3 to 4 days old at our baptism. Original SIn is the sin that the Blessed Mother was saved from at the MOMENT of her Conception. God saved her from it, he saved us when we are Baptised.
And indeed…some of the Fathers had that opinion.Hi rinnie,
If God can (and does) “wipe away” our original sin at Baptism (no dispute there from me), then why could God not wipe away the Blessed Virgin’s sin - all of it - at the time of the Visitation, for example?
Jon
And it seems to me, Mickey, that the important aspect of this is two-fold, 1) that Christ receives His humanity from an authentic (if I may use that term) human, the Holy Theotokos, and 2) that she is, as the angel says, highly favoured or full of grace.And indeed…some of the Fathers had that opinion.![]()
Well, she was 15 or 16 years old at the time, so if we assume that she was certifiably sinless by this quote of the Angel’s declaration there is no explanation for how it could be so.Exactly how can you be GOD FILLED and have SIN in you? Who ever said that you cannot lose your own salvation?
What does that have to do with the Blessed Mother being full of Grace:shrug:
1,300 years after the fact.Is everyone clear in regards to this mans work on the IC? He is the “why” and “how” to the acceptance of the IC Doctrine. Which many suggest was Divinely Inspired.
Hold on there big fellow where in the world was it ever said that she was sinless because she never sinned.Well, she was 15 or 16 years old at the time, so if we assume that she was certifiably sinless by this quote of the Angel’s declaration there is no explanation for how it could be so.
Traditionally, the assumption was that if she is sinless that was because she chose not to sin.
Later some Christians began to speculate on the depravity of humankind, but it was not always so taught. Once that idea took hold it was an immediate conflict with the sinlessness of Saint Mary, and the cult of Mary was growing, so there had to be a third theory to support that and exempt her from the second theory. That is what I would call ‘derivative theology’.
The idea that she was conceived immaculately was a bug fix, a patch. She had to be made an exception to the depravity of humankind (which was a newer concept gaining currency in some sectors).
But such thinking was not always so widely accepted. In the Christian east the exemption of Saint Mary from original sin never really caught on, because total depravity never caught on.
Hey boss, here is why. Simple if he would have waited until her visitation she would have had the stain of Original SIn on her the same as us.Hi rinnie,
If God can (and does) “wipe away” our original sin at Baptism (no dispute there from me), then why could God not wipe away the Blessed Virgin’s sin - all of it - at the time of the Visitation, for example?
Jon