R
Roseeurekacross
Guest
thenNo. (Post must be at least 16 characters.)
Was this a statement in any way throwing detracting light on Jesuit Priests?
Last edited:
thenNo. (Post must be at least 16 characters.)
I’m just pointing out that because a certain behavior does not result an in invalid sacramental outcome does not mean said behavior is good or even that it’s acceptable. A great deal of odd, even deleterious behavior in the Church has been justified by what amounts to “eliminating or ignoring XYZ (despite being a requirement of the Church) does not lead to an invalid sacrament, therefore it’s perfectly OK to ignore the Chuch’s requirements.”You continue to give subjective opinion, I asked for objective evidence, which you do not have or don’t wish to be constrained by, so I’m out!
My apologies. I corrected it.@Duesenberg, I don’t know how that last quote came out attributed to me, to just to keep things straight, Hereiam actually wrote it, in #30.
They were not vestments per se, but I did meet three priests wearing cassocks made of high-tech materials, while on a very long pilgrimage.I wonder if they could make rip stop nylon vestments? Tactical vestments for chaplains
First, you need to use proper terminology.Near in mind i am speaking of sacraments outside the Mass, which could include confessions, Eucharist, matrimony (ie, convalidation).
Simple question, considering use of “should” instead of “must”…is it your opinion or is it a canonical requirement that a stole be worn by the priest administering sacraments outside the Mass?
And, I’m not saying it is not canonical, but because so many “little ones” frequent this website seeking answers, we should use this opportunity for catechesis, by providing a source reference.
If it is not a canonical requirement, you may feel a Hawiaan shirt is inappropriate, but it is not illicit, and certainly does not make the sacrament invalid.
If it is your opinion that it inappropriate, that’s fair enough, but you must accept that nobody is obligated to share your opinion or mine.
[126.] The abuse is reprobated whereby the sacred ministers celebrate Holy Mass or other rites without sacred vestments or with only a stole over the monastic cowl or the common habit of religious or ordinary clothes, contrary to the prescriptions of the liturgical books, even when there is only one minister participating. In order that such abuses be corrected as quickly as possible, Ordinaries should take care that in all churches and oratories subject to their jurisdiction there is present an adequate supply of liturgical vestments made in accordance with the norms.
http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/c...doc_20040423_redemptionis-sacramentum_en.html
Rejecting your voiced theory which amounts to “if it doesn’t invalidate the sacrament, it’s OK” was quite objective. It was up to you to support your belief.Thanks Father. I was just looking for an answer with some objective evidence instead of “I like” and “I think”!