T
TimothyH
Guest
Your point about self-referential art is well taken. The news media is like this, writing stories about the news media as if they themselves were the news. Rock bands do the same thing, self-referential music is a clear sign of shallow writing.I think one of the problems here is that one of the hallmarks of modern style art, architecture and design is that it is self-referential. For instance, a person looking at a modern style painting is usually intended to have their attention drawn to the fact that they are looking at a painting, as oppossed to having their attention drawn into the subject of the painting. Its the same with modern architecture and design, the viewer is usually intended to have their attention drawn to the fact that are looking at architecture, rather than to the artistic idea (the “subject”) that the architecture conveys.
This is a problem when the art or architecture in question is religious in nature, because the purpose of religious art/architecture should be to draw our attention past itself and to its “subject”, which is God or the transcendent. With a modern design like this stage, our attention is drawn to architectural ideas, like lines vs curves, architectual space, etc, not necessarily to the subject of God.
I think this is why a number of us are reacting negatively to this stage; since it is modern in style it tends towards architecture for the sake of architecture, not architechture for the sake of God.
But the golden arches instantly reminded me of the cherubim over the Ark of the Covenant. As a student of Scripture, this was very natural to me, and I said, “Oh, look at the angel’s wings.”
I don’t see what is so self-referential about that. It is a clear reference so the Old Testament Ark of the Covenant and the Holy of Holies that is the Sanctuary and Altar. I personally can’t see anything self-referential about it. I got it right away, and it instantly made me think of God and his glory in the Temple.
-Tim-