What the 6mill Euros purchased (in part)

[gilliam]

Wahabi terrorism continued

Fifteen beheaded bodies have been found south Baghdad today. The IDs of the beheaded men and women are not yet known but it is most likely belongs to Iraqi Shiites among the pilgrimage to the holy cities in Najaf and Kerbala.

Wahabi terrorists who shed the Shiite blood have killed hundreds of them in Latiyfiyah in the last few months. These thugs use Saudi Wahabi Fatwa to carry out their crimes against non-Sunni people like Shiites and non-Muslims.

On the same time the Najaf police found 33 ready to fire rockets directed towards the city centre from the side of Bahr Al-Najaf which is from the side of Saudi Arabia. Many Saudi Wahabi terrorists have been captured in Najaf recently.

hammorabi.blogspot.com/2005/03/christian-citizens-nominated-ali.html

 

[Richardols]

Have American or Iraqi authorities confirmed that there is a direct link between the payment of the ransom for the Italian hostage and this particular attack?

 

[gilliam]

Richardols:

Have American or Iraqi authorities confirmed that there is a direct link between the payment of the ransom for the Italian hostage and this particular attack?

Are you attempting to justify the giving of 6mil Euros to terrorists so they can finance their murders or are you attempting to justify this particular attack?

 

[Richardols]

I believe that what you proposed is unverifiable. Absent some official verification of the nexus between payment and the attack, your accusation is nonsense.

Anyone can make accusations. Providing evidence to back such accusations is what is necessary to have anyone believe you.

 

[gilliam]

Richardols:

I believe that what you proposed is unverifiable. Absent some official verification of the nexus between payment and the attack, your accusation is nonsense.

Anyone can make accusations. Providing evidence to back such accusations is what is necessary to have anyone believe you.

You donate money to a political campaign, that money is used to promote the political agenda. You give money to terrorists who use car bombs as their primary weapon and pay people 200 euros per ‘hit’, it is a good asumption that they will use your 6 million euros to pay for their cause.

 

[Richardols]

Sorry, no cigar. You made a direct connection between the ransom payment and that particular attack. Absent any verification, the kindest thing I can say about your assertion is that it is hot air.

 

[gilliam]

Richardols:

Sorry, no cigar. You made a direct connection between the ransom payment and that particular attack. Absent any verification, the kindest thing I can say about your assertion is that it is hot air.

And you are making a lawyers arguement when you and I know that the terrorism in Iraq is fueled by money.

 

[Richardols]

gilliam:

And you are making a lawyers arguement when you and I know that the terrorism in Iraq is fueled by money.

No, a logical argument. Make an accusation, be able to prove it. In or out of a courtroom.

BTW, everything in Iraq is fueled by money - what the insurgents do, what the U.S. does, what the Iraqi governmet does.

 

[gilliam]

Richardols:

BTW, everything in Iraq is fueled by money - what the insurgents do, what the U.S. does, what the Iraqi governmet does.

So just go ahead and give them 6 million euros?

You don’t make any sense.

 

[Richardols]

gilliam:

You don’t make any sense.

No, you simply lack understanding. You said that terrorism is fueled by money. To be sure, but everything done there, for good or evil is fueled by money. I was pointing out that you were merely stating the obvious.

You are trying to dance away from the inability to provide any evidence for your proposition - that there is a direct connection between the ransom money and the latest attack. Whether there is or isn’t** can’t be established**.