What the hook-up culture has done to women.

[Xantippe]

I said the hashtag was funny. I said nothing about the hilarity of the God’s instructions to the Israelites. Try reading what I actually wrote.I as stated before, the point of the hashtag was that men should not marry women who sleep around. That is definitely something I agree with and will quote approvingly.How do you know where I am hanging out, or are you putting your own spin (again) on things?The average age of virginity loss for women is 17. 10 years is plenty of time to party.I still have plenty of time to decide my goals and then achieve them. **Besides, time is on my side. In about 10-15 years, the artificial uterus, virtual reality sex, and gynoids will be coming. ** If the current misandrist family laws do not change, even June Cleaver will have trouble getting married even with a pre-nup.Well, ignorance is bliss.

You’ve previously bragged about being a real Casanova (that was in the previous rape thread where you were arguing with a bunch of long-married people and insisting that only somebody who had never had sex could expect ongoing communication about consent during sex).

I have to say that I find the bragging about fornication distasteful from somebody who insists that he could only marry a virgin and that nobody should marry a “used up” party girl.

Pick a lane.

Also, you’re talking on a Catholic site about your dream of technologically enhanced masturbation and presumably doing IVF with an artificial womb to have children of your own, with presumably some sort of robot nanny.

You’re on the wrong forum.

Despite what you hear, people are still getting married and managing reasonably well. I was just at a 4th of July party with a bunch of young marrieds with kids. They seem to be lovely people and we had a great time. Just guessing, but I don’t think any of them are waiting for sexbots.

Spoiler alert: sexbots will be disappointing and alienating, just like porn.

 

[starshiptrooper]

You’ve previously bragged about being a real Casanova…

Ah no, I actually said the opposite of that, but since when did accuracy matter to you?

Also, you’re talking on a Catholic site about your dream of technologically enhanced masturbation and presumably doing IVF with an artificial womb to have children of your own, with presumably some sort of robot nanny.

There you go again making assumptions. I never said that was my dream. I am simply taking near future advances into account when planning my moves.

Spoiler alert: sexbots will be disappointing and alienating, just like porn.

You would know that how?

 

[Xantippe]

Ah no, I actually said the opposite of that, but since when did accuracy matter to you? :shrug:There you go again making assumptions. I never said that was my dream. I am simply taking near future advances into account when planning my moves.You would know that how?

You said both things. You bragged about how sexually experienced you are and also complained about how socially awkward you are and bad you are at dating.

You mention “gynoids” an awful lot compared to the actual guy. This is not the first time I’ve seen you mention it. There are a lot of posters on this forum, and I’ve never seen anybody else talk about sexbots at all.

If porn was great and emotionally fulfilling, you wouldn’t be dreaming of gynoids and virtual reality.

 

[starshiptrooper]

You said both things. You bragged about how sexually experienced you are and also complained about how socially awkward you are and bad you are at dating.

No, I did not. Now prove it or stop lying.

You mention “gynoids” an awful lot compared to the actual guy. This is not the first time I’ve seen you mention it. There are a lot of posters on this forum, and I’ve never seen anybody else talk about sexbots at all.

Your point?

If porn was great and emotionally fulfilling, you wouldn’t be dreaming of gynoids and virtual reality.

Making more assumptions.

 

[EasterJoy]

I do not negotiate. I send my trusty manservant who only deals in bitcoin, gold, or cash to arrange all of my business transactions. Actually, that was an assumption made by Xantippe. I have a proposal (not marriage before you assume that as well), if you agree to exercise a modicum of reading comprehension, I agree to simplify future posts to your level.

I see. Yes, you are definitely not the kind of man I’d introduce to someone. Do what you will with that feedback.

No, for the record, the hashtag is not remotely funny. Not even a tiny one-photon-of-light bit funny. It is equally offensive whether someone has a hymen or not, or knows someone who has a hymen or has ever had one or not, excepting those who are far below a certain “level.”

There are naturally a lot of weird Facebook groups… but then there are some that are just gross. Prime example: The “No Hymen, No Diamond” Facebook page, which proudly advances the idea that women who aren’t virgins aren’t worthy for guys to marry. Over 1,100 people have liked the page — no joke. Although maybe there’s a silver lining in this particularly noxious cloud, because in some ways, it’s actually (if accidentally) pretty helpful; after all, it is quite convenient to have a readily accessible list of 1,100 people never to date, ever, in a million years.
bustle.com/articles/113159-the-no-hymen-no-diamond-facebook-group-is-gross-so-lets-take-the-opportunity-to-clear

 

[Michael_Francis]

Closed pending review by family Life moderator.