R
Randy_Carson
Guest
I can’t think of any theological contributions that Protestants have made to Christianity as a whole.
Can you?
If true, then why is this the case?
Can you?
If true, then why is this the case?
That many of us who are not Catholics do not see any point of trying to dispute the conclusion you already had in posting this.Wow. Dead silence…what conclusions should be drawn from this?
All of these are rooted in prior Catholic thought. The only things Protestants added to them, from a Catholic perspective, are some late medieval philosophical presuppositions that tend to twist them into errors.Here are a few Theological contributions over the centuries:
Sola Fide - Salvation by faith alone, not by good works or deeds
Sola Scriptura - The Bible is the only doctrinal authority in Christianity
Solus Christus - Jesus is the only mediator between god and man
Decision Theology - Man must make a conscious decision of accepting Jesus as their personal lord and savior.
Unconditional Election - Some people were saved by God’s grace even before the world was created
These are really only a few. Quite a few theological contributions have come from Protestants.
I don’t understand. Catholicism is in opposition to many of these principles. How are they rooted in the faith?All of these are rooted in prior Catholic thought. .
As they are now formulated by most Protestants. Not in their origins.I don’t understand. Catholicism is in opposition to many of these principles.
The Catholic Church teaches that faith informed by love justifies, and that faith is necessary for justification. Pope Benedict reiterated what Catholics have always believed when he said “Luther’s phrase: ‘faith alone’ is true, if it is not opposed to faith in charity, in love.” What the Catholic Church rejects are later understandings of sola fide that claim faith does not need to be informed by charity, that faith without love can justify.How are they rooted in the faith?
Sola Fide - RCC teaches faith and good works.
We do not accept formulations of sola scriptura which overtly deny sacred tradition and the authority of the magisterium, but we do believe that scripture is divinely inspired in a way that the magisterium is not. Many Catholics accept a kind of prima scriptura position, and it is acceptable within Catholicism to believe in the material sufficiency of scripture. This is the original root of the Reformers’ sola scriptura, as Louis Bouyer aptly points out: “Luther’s insistence on the Bible and its supreme authority did not… signify to him or to [contemporary] Protestants in general a denial of tradition or of the authority of the Church.” It is later formulations that become increasingly problematic, not the root.Sola Scriptura - RCC teaches sacred magisterium.
From a Catholic perspective, this is a false dichotomy: the saints are living members of Jesus’ own Body. Even Protestants do not interpret this doctrine to mean that they cannot pray for one another.Solus Christus - RCC teaches saintly intercession
The Catholic Church also teaches that we have a responsibility to receive and live according to God’s grace inasmuch as we are able. A Catholic adult cannot say “Well, I was baptized as an infant, so I do not have to be faithful now.” Every moment is a moment in which we are called to conversion, every moment is an opportunity to say “yes” to God.Decision Theology - RCC practices infant baptism
It is, actually, we just believe differently about it than do Calvinists. We believe that all humans are created in, by, and for life in Jesus Christ, that all human beings are unconditionally chosen by God for participation by grace in the life of the holy Trinity. Calvinists believe only a few are so chosen and that it is impossible for the elect not to be saved; that’s where we differ with them.Unconditional Election - Catholicism does not mention this as central to their faith.
So the areas in which Catholicism differs with Protestants(Faith without works, unconditional election)…would these areas not be considered Protestant contributions to theology?As they are now formulated by most Protestants. Not in their origins.
The Catholic Church teaches that faith informed by love justifies, and that faith is necessary for justification. Pope Benedict reiterated what Catholics have always believed when he said “Luther’s phrase: ‘faith alone’ is true, if it is not opposed to faith in charity, in love.” What the Catholic Church rejects are later understandings of sola fide that claim faith does not need to be informed by charity, that faith without love can justify.
If you really want to dig deeper into this, I would heartily recommend the articles and blog posts by Bryan Cross on Called to Communion (e.g. here and here), and the lovely book The Spirit & Forms of Protestantism by Louis Bouyer.
We do not accept formulations of sola scriptura which overtly deny sacred tradition and the authority of the magisterium, but we do believe that scripture is divinely inspired in a way that the magisterium is not. Many Catholics accept a kind of prima scriptura position, and it is acceptable within Catholicism to believe in the material sufficiency of scripture. This is the original root of the Reformers’ sola scriptura, as Louis Bouyer aptly points out: “Luther’s insistence on the Bible and its supreme authority did not… signify to him or to [contemporary] Protestants in general a denial of tradition or of the authority of the Church.” It is later formulations that become increasingly problematic, not the root.
From a Catholic perspective, this is a false dichotomy: the saints are living members of Jesus’ own Body. Even Protestants do not interpret this doctrine to mean that they cannot pray for one another.
The Catholic Church also teaches that we have a responsibility to receive and live according to God’s grace inasmuch as we are able. A Catholic adult cannot say “Well, I was baptized as an infant, so I do not have to be faithful now.” Every moment is a moment in which we are called to conversion, every moment is an opportunity to say “yes” to God.
It is, actually, we just believe differently about it than do Calvinists. We believe that all humans are created in, by, and for life in Jesus Christ, that all human beings are unconditionally chosen by God for participation by grace in the life of the holy Trinity. Calvinists believe only a few are so chosen and that it is impossible for the elect not to be saved; that’s where we differ with them.![]()
That your thread is pointless and a farse not worthy of responding to.Wow. Dead silence…what conclusions should be drawn from this?
Did you take Religion 101? Just wondering.How about ‘The Rapture’…
or if you say you believe in Jesus Christ, you are saved…and you can sin lustily…Martin Luther…that is what I heard…but is it true?
There is no purgatory, Mary has no place, no communion of saints, books of the Bible deleted, no Mass, no need for other sacraments…
Maybe our contribution is to make you be a better Catholic.I can’t think of any theological contributions that Protestants have made to Christianity as a whole.
Can you?
If true, then why is this the case?
From a Catholic perspective, it’s not so much bringing something new to the table as taking something from the table and twisting it. (I don’t mean to imply that this is done maliciously, however.)So the areas in which Catholicism differs with Protestants(Faith without works, unconditional election)…would these areas not be considered Protestant contributions to theology?