E
ElizaE
Guest
When addressing the Bishop in a letter do you call him Most Reverent Bishop Smith or what do you write?
Thanks for the help
Thanks for the help
- Address Bishops verbally as “Bishop LastName.” It is optional to add his last name. If you say the Bishop’s last name, do so only once. After that, simply address him as “Bishop.” Address letters to “The Most Reverend Full Name, D.D.”, then add any other doctoral degrees, if he has any. In conversation, a bishop may be addressed “Bishop” without name. It is preferable to use no name than to call the Bishop by his first name. Simply address him as “Bishop.”
- Address Cardinals verbally as “Cardinal LastName” or “Your Eminence” without Name. If you address the Cardinal as “Cardinal LastName” do so only once. After that, address him as “Your Eminence.” Address letters to “His Eminence, The Most Reverend FirstName Cardinal LastName.” If the Cardinal is a Bishop, add “D.D.” and any other doctoral degrees he may have, after his last name.
I thought ‘Your Excellency’ was the term for aActually ‘Your Grace’ would be sufficient![]()
Not used in the USA - but somewhat common in Britain, etc.Actually ‘Your Grace’ would be sufficient![]()
yes, but rarely used in the USA any more. I suggest you stick to Bishop.I thought ‘Your Excellency’ was the term for a(arch)bishop who is not a cardinal?
![]()
"ReverendSof if I am writing an invitation to a Mass than I would write…
The Mass will be officiated by the Most Reverent Bishop John Smith and Father Sam Jones.
Does this sound ok or should I add Reverent in front of Father?
I always follow the rule that email is the same as a letter, so one should always use the same format when writing a letter.I was just about to post a thread when I saw this one. What is the proper way to address a bishop in an e-mail? Would it be the same as a letter, or could I simply write Bishop and then his last name? I ask because writing “Your Excellency” feels strange considering that the bishop will likely not be the one to actually read the e-mail. Thanks.
Sorry, guess I am old fashioned. Just my personal preferance.I wrote an e-mail to my Bishop and began it by addressing him as Your Excellency and he wrote me back.
Actually, you don’t need "Bishop"and “Father” in this style of address. You could say “The Mass will be celebrated by the Most Reverend John Smith, Bishop of XXXXX, with the Reverend Sam Jones concelebrating,” if it were a formal invitation.Sof if I am writing an invitation to a Mass than I would write…
The Mass will be officiated by the Most Reverent Bishop John Smith and Father Sam Jones.
Does this sound ok or should I add Reverent in front of Father?
First, check to see if both Bishop Smith and Father Jones are indeed concelebrating, rather than just one celebrating and the other present. It may be the Father Jones is celebrating the Mass in the presence of Bishop Smith, but Bishop Smith would not himself be a concelebrant.Sof if I am writing an invitation to a Mass than I would write…
The Mass will be officiated by the Most Reverent Bishop John Smith and Father Sam Jones.
Does this sound ok or should I add Reverent in front of Father?
Was he thankful for the promotion?For what it’s worth, I wrote an e-mail to my Archbishop using “Your Eminence” and got a reply.
I think he ignored my ignoranceWas he thankful for the promotion?
I know, it does feel rather informal, but e-mail is listed as the preferred method of contact on the diocese website.I always follow the rule that email is the same as a letter, so one should always use the same format when writing a letter.
However, I have always frowned on using email as a form of communication when it is in the nature of being formal. And I cannot view any letter to a bishop being informal, unless he is your brother.
I would caution using email and take the time to write a letter and mail it. I think Mrs. Manners would agree on this one.![]()