M
Mortification
Guest
What the title says. Thanks.
- Status
P
ProspectCard
Guest
I have more than one version, but I use the NAB (New American Bible) most of the time. Here’s a helpful link: usccb.org/nab/bible/index.shtml 
J
josephback
Guest
I have the Orthodox Study Bible
And an NKJV 66 book Protestant one. I’ll probably buy the Ignatius Press if I ever feel the need for a Catholic edition
And an NKJV 66 book Protestant one. I’ll probably buy the Ignatius Press if I ever feel the need for a Catholic edition
J
jwinch2
Guest
Revised Standard Version, Second Catholic Edition for me. When the new Orthodox translation of the Septuigant is finished, I will likely pick one of those up but I am pretty happy overall with the RSV2CE.
C
corsair
Guest
My wife likes the Ignatius Bible, while I use the Douay Rheims. both, by the way, are Catholic Bibles. 
Z
ZDHayden
Guest
The answer to that depends on what mood I’m in. I like the Douay-Rheims, the New Jerusalem, the RSV, the NAB, the old Clementine Vulgate and the Nova Vulgata.
For the Psalms, I like the New Jerusalem. To prepare for Mass, I like the NAB. For the Gospels, I like the RSV. For everything generally (as a nice one-version Bible), I like the Douay-Rheims. I have recently received both a copy of the Clementina and Nova Vulgata. The Clementine is very poetic and beautiful (can’t use it much because not many people know Latin, and I think the antiquated language of the Douay is a barrier to many), but the accuracy of the Nova Vulgata to the Greek impresses me. It isn’t a bad translation on its own, either, well, except for the grammatical errors. My copy also has some limited footnotes.
For the Psalms, I like the New Jerusalem. To prepare for Mass, I like the NAB. For the Gospels, I like the RSV. For everything generally (as a nice one-version Bible), I like the Douay-Rheims. I have recently received both a copy of the Clementina and Nova Vulgata. The Clementine is very poetic and beautiful (can’t use it much because not many people know Latin, and I think the antiquated language of the Douay is a barrier to many), but the accuracy of the Nova Vulgata to the Greek impresses me. It isn’t a bad translation on its own, either, well, except for the grammatical errors. My copy also has some limited footnotes.
A
Aelred_Minor
Guest
Here’s a partial answer.
There is no one version all Catholics use.
Those who know the original languages of course might read it in the original. Those who know Latin might read the Vulgate.
As far as English translations, some prefer the old Douay-Rheims Bible, which is written in a mixed Tudor/Stewart English much like the King James Bible.
A more modern translation many English speaking Catholics like is the Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition (RSV-CE), a revision of a Protestant version (roots going back to the King James) containing all the books of the Catholic Bible and some changes, some to correct bad theology that crept into the original RSV, others simply language changes presumably made for readability. I believe the RSV-CE is the version used in Great Britain and probably many other English-speaking countries in the liturgy, and English translations of Vatican documents usually is it for Scripture quotations.
There’s actually a first and second edition of the RSV-CE following a second round of Catholic revision, and also the Ignatius Catholic Study Bible, which is the RSV-CE (Second Edition) with commentary by the likes of Scott Hahn. I have heard some very good things about it, and plan on buying one soon.
In the United States, the bishops have produced the New American Bible, on which our lectionary is based. Some Catholics have been critical about parts of this translation, including the rather banal translation of the much beloved Pslam 23, and especially critical of some of the introductions to the various books and footnotes found in the volume, which may assert certain questionable scholarly opinions with too much confidence and even might seem like they were written by a non-believer, though the translation and supplemental material have received all sorts of imprimaturs. A new edition of the NAB just came out, making a few changes that some people were critical of. For example, they changed the word “holocaust” to “burnt offering.”
A third English translation that has long held a place among English speaking Catholics is the Jerusalem Bible, though I know very little about it except that it was (I assume still is) the favorite of Mother Angelica and that J.R.R. Tolkien played some small part in producing the translation. That sounds encouraging, as far as it goes.
The New Revised Standard Version (NRSV), which apparently also has a Catholic edition though I’ve never seen it, and New Jerusalem Bible have both been criticized for containing inclusive language, that is, language that has been changed to be more gender-neutral. Assuming the criticism to be factually correct I share the concern. When reading the Bible I want to know what the inspired text actually says. If the translator really wants to insert his or her opinion on how a passage should be interpreted, do it with a footnote, not through a deliberate corruption of the text.
There is no one version all Catholics use.
Those who know the original languages of course might read it in the original. Those who know Latin might read the Vulgate.
As far as English translations, some prefer the old Douay-Rheims Bible, which is written in a mixed Tudor/Stewart English much like the King James Bible.
A more modern translation many English speaking Catholics like is the Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition (RSV-CE), a revision of a Protestant version (roots going back to the King James) containing all the books of the Catholic Bible and some changes, some to correct bad theology that crept into the original RSV, others simply language changes presumably made for readability. I believe the RSV-CE is the version used in Great Britain and probably many other English-speaking countries in the liturgy, and English translations of Vatican documents usually is it for Scripture quotations.
There’s actually a first and second edition of the RSV-CE following a second round of Catholic revision, and also the Ignatius Catholic Study Bible, which is the RSV-CE (Second Edition) with commentary by the likes of Scott Hahn. I have heard some very good things about it, and plan on buying one soon.
In the United States, the bishops have produced the New American Bible, on which our lectionary is based. Some Catholics have been critical about parts of this translation, including the rather banal translation of the much beloved Pslam 23, and especially critical of some of the introductions to the various books and footnotes found in the volume, which may assert certain questionable scholarly opinions with too much confidence and even might seem like they were written by a non-believer, though the translation and supplemental material have received all sorts of imprimaturs. A new edition of the NAB just came out, making a few changes that some people were critical of. For example, they changed the word “holocaust” to “burnt offering.”
A third English translation that has long held a place among English speaking Catholics is the Jerusalem Bible, though I know very little about it except that it was (I assume still is) the favorite of Mother Angelica and that J.R.R. Tolkien played some small part in producing the translation. That sounds encouraging, as far as it goes.
The New Revised Standard Version (NRSV), which apparently also has a Catholic edition though I’ve never seen it, and New Jerusalem Bible have both been criticized for containing inclusive language, that is, language that has been changed to be more gender-neutral. Assuming the criticism to be factually correct I share the concern. When reading the Bible I want to know what the inspired text actually says. If the translator really wants to insert his or her opinion on how a passage should be interpreted, do it with a footnote, not through a deliberate corruption of the text.
D
Danquayle76
Guest
I use the NAB for lack of anything better, but I have been thinking of purchasing a RSV-CE Bible.
G
GWright
Guest
The Douay-Rheims - the counter reformation masterpiece - is the be-all-and-end-all, for me.
I am lucky enough to have a large presentation edition - it has the Old and New Testaments, and three Papal encyclicals too.
I also have a small pocket-size Douay-Rheims New Testament and Psalms.
Great versions, you cant go wrong with them imo.
I am lucky enough to have a large presentation edition - it has the Old and New Testaments, and three Papal encyclicals too.
I also have a small pocket-size Douay-Rheims New Testament and Psalms.
Great versions, you cant go wrong with them imo.
C
Cider
Guest
I use the Douay Rheims and the RSV mostly.
S
Swiss_Guy
Guest
NAB-RE, RSV-2CE, NIV. I like these because they all use modern day vocabulary. I guess I just like dynamic translations 
(but not paraphrases like the CEV ), as I usually don’t study them, just casual reading. I get to use a pure Catholic Bible (NAB-RE), a hybrid of Catholic and Protestant (RSV-2CE), and a pure Protestant Bible (NIV). I use the NAB-RE the most though.
(but not paraphrases like the CEV ), as I usually don’t study them, just casual reading. I get to use a pure Catholic Bible (NAB-RE), a hybrid of Catholic and Protestant (RSV-2CE), and a pure Protestant Bible (NIV). I use the NAB-RE the most though.
M
Mojo674
Guest
Orthodox Study Bible and if I don’t have that handy then I use the RSV. Josephblack there is nothing wrong with the OSB and it was actually recommended to me by a priest with a Sacred Theology Doctorate who has learned Greek, Hebrew, Aramaic, Latin, and countless other languages. It is the only complete English translation of the Old Testament from the Septuagint, and the NKJV New Testament is perfectly legitimate and very close to the RSV.
mathematoons
New member
What I’m wondering is, why only one Bible?
I use different Bibles for different purposes. I have a NAB study Bible (called the “School and Church Edition”), a Catholic RSV, a NKJV Life Principles Bible, a Catholic GNB, and even a copy of George Lamsa’s translation from the Aramaic. Sometimes I look at them all when I want to know more about a particular passage.
I use different Bibles for different purposes. I have a NAB study Bible (called the “School and Church Edition”), a Catholic RSV, a NKJV Life Principles Bible, a Catholic GNB, and even a copy of George Lamsa’s translation from the Aramaic. Sometimes I look at them all when I want to know more about a particular passage.
J
jwinch2
Guest
I think the study notes are part of the reason that many Orthodox and Eastern Catholics are not enamored with the OSB but I could be wrong. I did some serious searching on here as well as Orthodox Answers a while back when I was contemplating picking that one up.
A
ATeutonicKnight
Guest
NAB usually. However, the absolute best Bible you can by is Douay Rheims. It is the best translation. All the Catholic Apologists use it. The problem is the cheapest one you’ll find is fifty dollars.
Dominus Vobiscum.
:knight1:
J
jwinch2
Guest
Can you provide some evidence here? Jimmy Akin, Scott Hahn, and Tim Staples all use the RSV2CE from my understanding.
This provides a decent discussion of several bible translations: catholic.com/library/Bible_Translations_Guide.asp
F
FAB
Guest
The New american bible is the version used for all the readings in mass.I have more than one version, but I use the NAB (New American Bible) most of the time. Here’s a helpful link: usccb.org/nab/bible/index.shtml
D
Dave2300
Guest
I use the RSV-CE, Revised Standard Edition, Catholic Edition------ and in answer to another question earlier, the NRSV does indeed come in a Catholic Edition.
S
SonCatcher
Guest
How about I just list what’s in my library at present (in approximate order of acquisition):
NAB (revised NT, original OT)
KJV plus “apocrypha” (separate volume)
NIV with concordance and lexicon
DR
Jewish New Testament (commentary in separate volume)
Jerusalem Bible (1966)
I am undecided about picking up the updated NAB at this time but expect that a RSV will eventually find a place in my library (if I can find one in a Catholic edition with study aids that rival the NIV already in my library). I also am reserving space for a particular printing of the JB (Dali illustrations - rare).
NAB (revised NT, original OT)
KJV plus “apocrypha” (separate volume)
NIV with concordance and lexicon
DR
Jewish New Testament (commentary in separate volume)
Jerusalem Bible (1966)
I am undecided about picking up the updated NAB at this time but expect that a RSV will eventually find a place in my library (if I can find one in a Catholic edition with study aids that rival the NIV already in my library). I also am reserving space for a particular printing of the JB (Dali illustrations - rare).
E
ebanjolist
Guest
Dumbarton Oaks Medieval Library (Harvard University Press) is putting out a 5 volume combined Vulgate/Douay-Rheims bible. It contains reconstruction of various Latin passages to more closely fit Bishop Challoner’s English translation of the D-R, under the assumption that the Sixto-Clementine Vulgate did not completely resemble the original Vulgate of St. Jerome that was used to make the D-R. Also, many stylistic changes were implemented to make it easier to read (reads like a novel).
amazon.ca/Vulgate-Bible-Pentateuch-Douay-Rheims-Translation/dp/0674055349/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1309374091&sr=1-2
It does not have Imprimatur or Nihil-Obstat marks. However, it is a nice set with facing pages Latin/English and large type. The bible passages do not have footnotes. I have just received Volume 1 - The Pentateuch, and Volumes 2 (A and B) - The Historical Books. Volume 3 - The Poetical Books, will be released later this year, with Volumes 4 and 5 to be released in the future.
I also have the RSV-CE, as well as Ignatius Catholic Study Bible, and am expecting the NABRE Catholic Answers Bible (Fireside Publishing) in the mail next month. I’m fairly new to reading the Bible, so I’ll let you know which I prefer in a few months time.
amazon.ca/Vulgate-Bible-Pentateuch-Douay-Rheims-Translation/dp/0674055349/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1309374091&sr=1-2
It does not have Imprimatur or Nihil-Obstat marks. However, it is a nice set with facing pages Latin/English and large type. The bible passages do not have footnotes. I have just received Volume 1 - The Pentateuch, and Volumes 2 (A and B) - The Historical Books. Volume 3 - The Poetical Books, will be released later this year, with Volumes 4 and 5 to be released in the future.
I also have the RSV-CE, as well as Ignatius Catholic Study Bible, and am expecting the NABRE Catholic Answers Bible (Fireside Publishing) in the mail next month. I’m fairly new to reading the Bible, so I’ll let you know which I prefer in a few months time.
- Status