What was troubling?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fbl9
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
F

fbl9

Guest
The gospel written by St.Luke.1:28-29And when the angel had come to her,he said,“Hail,full of grace, the Lord is with thee,Blessed art thou among women.” When she had heard him she was troubled at his word, and kept pondering what manner of greeting this might be…
What was the issue for Mary in the angel’s greeting,was it because he addressed her as one would address a queen?

i am at a busy time so if i am not here,it is not because i abanded my thread but just don’t have the time…i will try to check in when i am able to …thanks in advance for any replies.
 
Lots of appearances of angels in scripture are followed by those words from them - ‘be not afraid’ - for example the appearance to the shepherds. Perhaps it wasn’t so much what the angel said, rather that there’s just something about the angels in general that makes them frightening.

I guess any appearance of a being so very different to us in a lot of ways, and more powerful and capable than us in a lot of ways, might be frightening in itself.

I might be frightened in the presence of a 10-foot-tall gazillion-pound pro wrestler no matter how gently and kindly they spoke to me - merely looking at someone who just might be able to snap my neck with one hand would be enough …

Then again, Mary was very young and very humble. She would’ve known that the appearance of angels is usually connected with some great task or event, and perhaps felt unequal to or unworthy of whatever it was that she could see God might be about to lay upon her.
 
“There are young maidens without number: one is my dove, my perfect one.”

From ‘The Glories of Mary’ by St. Alphonsus Maria de Liguroi, Bishop and Doctor of the Church:

But what does the humble Mary answer to a salutation so full of praises? Nothing; she remains silent, but reflecting upon it, is troubled: *Who having heard was troubled at his saying, and thought with herself what manner of salutation this should be. * (“Quae cum audisset, turbata est in sermone ejus, et cogitabat quails esset ista salutation”).

Why was she troubled? Did she fear an illusion, or was it her virginal modesty which caused her to be disturbed at the sight of a man, as some suppose, in the belief that the Angel appeared under a human form? No, the text is clear: “She was troubled at his saying.” ‘Not at his appearance, but at what he said,’ remarks Eusebius Emissenus. Her trouble, then, arose entirely from her humility, which was disturbed at the sound of praises so far exceeding her own lowly estimate of herself. Hence, the more the angel exalted her, the more she humbled herself, and entered into consideration of her own nothingness. . .

The Blessed Virgin was already well aware, from the sacred Scriptures, that the time fortold by the prophets for the coming of the Messiah had arrived; that the weeks of Daniel were completed; that already, according to the prophecy of Jacob, the sceptre of Juda had passed into the hands of Herod, a strange king: she already knew that a Virgin was to be the Mother of the Messiah. She then heard the angel give her praises which, it was evident, could apply to no other than to the Mother of God. Hence, may not the thought, or at least some vague impression, have entered her mind that perhaps she was this chosen Mother of God? No, her profound humility did not even admit such an idea. Those praises only caused great fear in her: “so much so,” as St. Peter Chrysologus remarks, “that as Christ was pleased to be comforted by an angel, so was it necessary that the Blessed Virgin should be encouraged by one” (“Sicut Christus per Angelum confortari voluit, ita decuit Virginem per Angelum animari”—Suarez, De Inc. q. 30, a. 2).

St. Gabriel, seeing Mary so troubled and almost stupefied by the salutation, was obliged to encourage her, saying, *Fear not, Mary; for thou hast found grace with God. * (“Ne timeas, Maria; invenisti enim gratiam apud Deum”—Luke, i. 30).

Fear not, O Mary, and be not surprised at the great titles by which I have saluted thee; for if thou in thine own eyes art so little and lowly, God, who exalts the humble, has made thee worthy to find the grace lost by men; and therefore he has preserved thee from the common stain of the children of Adam. Hence, from the moment of thy conception, he has honored thee with a grace greater than that of all the saints; and therefore he now finally exalts thee even to the dignity of being his Mother. Behold, thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and shalt bring forth a Son: and thou shalt call His name Jesus. (“Ecce concipies in utero, et paries filium, et vocabis nomen ejus Jesum”).

And now, why this delay, O Mary? “The angel awaits the reply” (says St. Bernard); “and we also, O Lady, on whom the sentence of condemnation weighs so heavily, await the word of mercy” (“Exspectat Angelus responsum; expectamus et nos, O Domina! verbum miserationis, quos miserabiliter permit sentential damnationis”); we, who are already condemned to death.

“Behold, the price of our salvation is offered thee; we shall be instantly delivered if thou consentest” (“Ecce offertur tibi pretium salutis nostrae; statim liberabimur, si consentis”), continues the same St. Bernard. Behold, O Mother of us all, the price of our salvation is already offered thee: that price will be the divine Word, made man in thee; in that moment in which thou acceptest him for thy Son we shall be delivered from death. “For thy Lord himself desires thy consent, by which he has determined to save the world, with an ardor equal to the love with which he has loved thy beauty” (“Ipse quoque omnium Dominus, quantum concupivit decorum tuum, tantum desiderat et responsionis assensum, in qua nimirum proposuit salvare mundum”—De Laud. V. M. hom. 4).

“Answer then, O sacred Virgin,” says St. Augustine, or some other ancient author; “why delayest thou giving life to the world?” (“Responde jam, Virgo sacra! vitam quid tricas mundo?”—Serm. 120, E. B. app.). Answer quickly, O Lady; no longer delay the salvation of the world, which now depends upon thy consent.

But see, Mary already answers; she says to the angel: Behold the handmaid of the Lord; be it done to me according to thy word. (“Ecce ancilla Domini; fiat mihi secundum verbum tuum”—Luke, i. 38).
 
O, what more beautiful, more humble, or more prudent answer could all the wisdom of men and angels together have invented, had they reflected for a million years? O powerful answer, which rejoiced heaven, and brought an immense sea of graces and blessings into the world!—answer which had scarcely fallen from the lips of Mary, before it drew the only begotten Son of God from the bosom of his Eternal Father, to become man in her most pure womb! Yes indeed; for scarcely had she uttered these words, * Behold the handmaid of the Lord; be it done to me according to thy word,* when instantly *the Word was made flesh *(“Et Verbum caro factum est, et habitavit in nobis”—John, i. 14); the Son of God became also the Son of Mary.

“O powerful Fiat!” exclaims St. Thomas of Villanova; “O efficacious Fiat! O Fiat to be venerated above every other Fiat! For with a fiat God created light, heaven, earth; but with Mary’s fiat,” says the saint, “God became man, like us” (“O fiat potens! O fiat efficax! O fiat super omne fiat, perpetuo honore venerandum!”—De Ann. conc. 1).

Let us, however, not wander from our point, but consider the great humility of the Blessed Virgin in this answer. She was fully enlightened as to the greatness of the dignity of a Mother of God. She had already been assured by the angel that she was this happy Mother chosen by our Lord. But with all this, she in no way rises in her own estimation, she does not stop to rejoice in her exaltation; but seeing, on the one side, her own nothingness, and on the other the infinite majesty of God, who chose her for his Mother, she acknowledges how unworthy she is of so great an honor, but will not oppose his will in the least thing. Hence, when her consent is asked, what does she do? what does she say? Wholly annihilated within herself, yet all inflamed at the same time by the ardor of her desire to unite herself thus still more closely to God, and abandoning herself entirely to the divine will, she answers, *Behold the handmaid of the Lord. * Behold the slave of the Lord, obliged to do that which her Lord commands. As if she meant to say: Since God chooses me for his Mother, who have nothing of my own, and since all that I have is his gift, who can ever think that he has done so on account of my own merits? Behold the handmaid of the Lord. What merit can a slave ever have, that she should become the Mother of her Lord? Behold the handmaid of the Lord. May the goodness of God alone be praised, and not his slave: since it is all his goodness, that he fixes his eyes on so lowly a creature as I am, to make her so great.

Reading the ‘Glories of Mary’ helps one to pray the rosary and the Hail Mary with more grace. Christ’s peace to you.
 
:)thanks for your replies Lily M and Shin…this question was running through my mind all day yesterday and i could not fathom why Mary was troubled by the angel’s greeting…for the angel didn’t even get to the “good” part of his message to Mary and she was troubled just by the way she was being greeted.
 
Our Mother was clearly a woman of great faith, but she was also a mortal human being he lived in a predictable and slow-changing world. While many of us sometimes pray to be visited by an Angel at some point in our lives, I imagine the true presence of one of these beings would be somewhat disconcerting at first since it is so outside the rhythm of our daily lives. Perhaps Mary reacted similarly.
 
Well, it was pretty weird to have someone say, “Hello, Kechairitoumene!”

Mary was literally wondering what the heck this guy meant by calling her “Fullestofgrace”, exactly like it was her name. It was apparently a newly coined word, never used for anything else before or since.

So the angel wasn’t addressing her like a queen. He was addressing her like nobody else. It was weird. It was disturbing.
 
Well, it was pretty weird to have someone say, “Hello, Kechairitoumene!”

Mary was literally wondering what the heck this guy meant by calling her “Fullestofgrace”, exactly like it was her name. It was apparently a newly coined word, never used for anything else before or since.

So the angel wasn’t addressing her like a queen. He was addressing her like nobody else. It was weird. It was disturbing.
🙂 the angel did not just say hello he said “hail” which is not another word for hello…
all hello the king,just doesn’t sound right eh?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top