What would an American Catholic theocracy look like?

  • Thread starter Thread starter IronHammer
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I

IronHammer

Guest
Dr. Taylor Marshall recently planted a powerful and tempting seed for me on his blog, Canterbury Tales, entitled If America were a fully Catholic country, here is what it might look like….

America is and always has been a country founded on the basic tenets of personal liberty and the pursuit of happiness. In the beginning, when nearly all men had a moral compass, even if it was Protestant in nature, Americans enjoyed a modicum of decency. But today, freedom’s chickens are coming home to roost and Americans’ morals and fidelity to Christ are crumbling at a rapid rate. We are seeing the inevitable culmination of the freedom that was given to us.

I know there have been discussions here in the past about theocracies, but I feel compelled to further explore Dr. Marshall’s ideas as to how a truly Catholic form of government could provide a virtuous and respectable society to live in. I am particularly interested in how we can incorporate the more fruitful lessons learned from the Great American Experiment. Dr. Marshall isn’t in the habit of dipping his toes into the political arena so please don’t get the idea that he is “stirring the pot” of revolution or anything as seditious as that. He is simply playing out a thought experiment of what a modern day version St. Augustine’s City of God could look like.

NOTE: I am looking for an academic discussion here and not a flame war!

Thanks!
 
Just a minor correction, but a confessional nation is not necessarily a theocracy, which implies direct temporal rule by the clergy.

I think, in addition to the mostly political points Dr. Marshall mentions, the impact on culture would have to be profound. (I’m surprised he didn’t mention this. Replacing our present leftist/atheist/consequentialist elites with devout and holy Catholics would profoundly reshape culture. Does he accept the leftist view, that everything, ultimately, is political, and everything not political is of secondary importance?)

So yes, in such a society, desecration of the Eucharist might be outlawed. But more importantly it would be socially reviled. Think of all the poisonous vitriol directed at George Zimmerman; now imagine it redirected to PZ Meyers.

Also, imagine the whole nation taking a 10-minute break at 3 PM on Fridays and tuning it to their local news or radio station to collectively pray the chaplet of divine mercy.

And, needless to say, vocations would probably skyrocket.
 
I’d be curious to see what ‘blasphemy’ involves. Newadvent defines it as the derogation of honor due to God. This is obviously vague because it doesn’t tell us what honors are due to God, as opposed to those supererogatorily given. I know some might say God is due worship, or some such. So, it seems denying God’s existence would be derogating honor due to God.
 
(NOTE: I am looking for an academic discussion here and not a flame war!)
I can’t give an academic reply, but his model would be a lot better than it is now!
 
I should point out that my thoughts on starting this thread weren’t meant to take us down the rabbit-hole of political reform. I was thinking of an exercise much more fundamental and abstract in nature.

In other words, if we Catholics of today were suddenly presented with the same opportunity that was given to America’s founding fathers, which is the grace of having the ability to craft a completely new form of government from scratch, how could it be constructed in such a way as to build the City of God while being careful to ensure justice and respect of persons that are hallmarks of modern America?

Since I am unfamiliar with Confessional governments, I will have to research this. But it seems to me that it may not be relevant whether this new government (I will call it Catholicland, to simplify things) is Confessional or Theocratic.

Some ideas for our hypothetical and ambitious Catholicland:
  1. Should Canon Law be the ultimate foundation of the Law of the Land, informing and limiting all levels of government?
  2. All government office holders must be practicing Catholics. I think this goes without saying.
  3. Would it be appropriate to have Judicial, Legislative and Executive branches divided into a Senate and House as it is with the United States?
  4. Would the government be able to keep non-Catholic influences at bay such as pornography, immoral TV shows/movies, gay pride marches, non-Catholic churches, abortion activism, etc…? Remember, it is a just and virtuous place so inhumane treatment must be completely out of the question. History is clear about how effective those methods are.
  5. Americans love their property rights and capitalism but these are at odds with the teachings of Holy Mother Church. Would distributism be the best economic system as several Popes have championed?
  6. Should the government administer entitlement programs such as health care, foster care, homelessness and unemployment? If so, what legal mechanisms would be required to prevent abuse and inhumane treatment?
  7. Obviously, it would be impractical to attempt to enforce all aspects of faithful living such as attending mass and alms-giving. Nothing comes to mind of any parallels in American society that would provide insight into such a thing, but would some type of merit system be effective in rewarding faithful behavior while discouraging unfaithful behavior?
 
Wow I’m glad to see this topic. I’ve been thinking about this very same thing ever since the HHS mandate.
 
I do not believe for a second that a Catholic theocracy would be possible here in the USA. As soon as you were to get a Catholic theocracy in the Sates someone would decide to tell the Pope and the Vatican what to do or not to do and then you would have a schism at best. I can see it from the title “American Catholic Theocracy” and not simply “Catholic Theocracy”, it is subtle but it is already there.
 
I was watching an atheist convention on T.V. the other day. Atheists seem to be paranoid about this country becoming a theocracy. We would have to completely change the Constitution and the Bill of Rights to have a union of Church and State in America. I can assure the alarmists in the atheist movement that the greater opposition to that change would come from the Catholics themselves.
 
It would simply depend on which Catholics ran the theocracy. If extremists and the ultra-orthodox ran it, it would resemble the Taliban or Saudi Arabia. If moderates ran it, along the lines of a Constitutional Theocracy, it would be a different story.
 
It would simply depend on which Catholics ran the theocracy. If extremists and the ultra-orthodox ran it, it would resemble the Taliban or Saudi Arabia. If moderates ran it, along the lines of a Constitutional Theocracy, it would be a different story.
There is only one kind of Catholics that can run a Catholic theocracy, the orthodox ones. Anything else would not make it a Catholic theocracy. I also think that you should inform yourself about the fundamental tenets of Catholic teachings in terms of moral theology and social doctrine of the Church before making such kind of comments.
 
Hmmmmmm, interesting…

It seems he’s more asking what the U.S. would look like if Catholicism was the dominate denomination (something like 99%). I do agree that most social things the church teaches against (abortion, contraception, etc) would likely be outlawed.

It also seems reasonable to conclude that canon law would be the law of the land. This would make some people quite happy and others quite angry. Also, what would happen to Catholics who dissent from it?
 
I can’t help but think i fit was some sort of way Orthodox Catholicism that this would not be something even many Catholics of today would want. But beyond that - the last poster mentioned - what happens to those that dissent? I think that we would wind up having some kind of “Catholic Police” situation “ooh…I think I say my neighbor’s girl go into her boy friends house…this is something that could be an occaision of sin…oooh I didn’t see my next door neighbors at Church and I went by to visit and none of them were sick and no one would tell me why they wern’t there…ooooh I think I say such and such do such and such and that’s against Catholic teaching…” – There’s a reason Thomas Moore’s Utopia never came to be. Even an American Catholic theocracy would have to have humans in it - humans who sin and make mistakes - humans who are going to get some power (be they lay people or Priests or Bishops or whatever) and there are going to be abuses. A theocracy in America or anywhere is a nice thought - but in reality, I could see it becoming like other societies where religion is part of or is the law - and there are going to be a lot of people in America who wouldn’t want anything to do with a Catholic theocracy - I can’t imagine America ever being one don’t know I would ever want to see it. Heaven may be a theocracy but we’re all put through the fires of perfection before getting there - no body down here is perfect.
God Bless
Rye
 
I can’t help but think i fit was some sort of way Orthodox Catholicism that this would not be something even many Catholics of today would want. But beyond that - the last poster mentioned - what happens to those that dissent? I think that we would wind up having some kind of “Catholic Police” situation “ooh…I think I say my neighbor’s girl go into her boy friends house…this is something that could be an occaision of sin…oooh I didn’t see my next door neighbors at Church and I went by to visit and none of them were sick and no one would tell me why they wern’t there…ooooh I think I say such and such do such and such and that’s against Catholic teaching…” – There’s a reason Thomas Moore’s Utopia never came to be. Even an American Catholic theocracy would have to have humans in it - humans who sin and make mistakes - humans who are going to get some power (be they lay people or Priests or Bishops or whatever) and there are going to be abuses. A theocracy in America or anywhere is a nice thought - but in reality, I could see it becoming like other societies where religion is part of or is the law - and there are going to be a lot of people in America who wouldn’t want anything to do with a Catholic theocracy - I can’t imagine America ever being one don’t know I would ever want to see it. Heaven may be a theocracy but we’re all put through the fires of perfection before getting there - no body down here is perfect.
God Bless
Rye
I agree with you. 👍

Believe it or not, I would not want to live in a country like that. 🤷

Good thread.
 
It would simply depend on which Catholics ran the theocracy. If extremists and the ultra-orthodox ran it, it would resemble the Taliban or Saudi Arabia. If moderates ran it, along the lines of a Constitutional Theocracy, it would be a different story.
Cause, you know, all religions are exactly alike once you brush aside all the unimportant stuff, like what they believe and why they believe it.
Hmmmmmm, interesting…

It seems he’s more asking what the U.S. would look like if Catholicism was the dominate denomination (something like 99%). I do agree that most social things the church teaches against (abortion, contraception, etc) would likely be outlawed.

It also seems reasonable to conclude that canon law would be the law of the land. This would make some people quite happy and others quite angry. Also, what would happen to Catholics who dissent from it?
Not necessarily. Our dominant social creed is basically leftist atheist utilitarianism, even though true leftist atheist utilitarians are extremely rare, probably fewer than 1 in 10. Outside the universities and mass media, most people are ordinary, white, heterosexual, hard-working Christians.

People really overestimate the strength of democracy. Even in democratic nations, the people follow the elites – both in opinion and in the law. Recent history gives us plenty of examples of the state acting against the people’s wishes and the result being not the reformation of the state’s will but the deformation of the people’s wishes. Gay “marriage” is only one example of this.
I can’t help but think i fit was some sort of way Orthodox Catholicism that this would not be something even many Catholics of today would want. But beyond that - the last poster mentioned - what happens to those that dissent? I think that we would wind up having some kind of “Catholic Police” situation “ooh…I think I say my neighbor’s girl go into her boy friends house…this is something that could be an occaision of sin…oooh I didn’t see my next door neighbors at Church and I went by to visit and none of them were sick and no one would tell me why they wern’t there…ooooh I think I say such and such do such and such and that’s against Catholic teaching…” – There’s a reason Thomas Moore’s Utopia never came to be. Even an American Catholic theocracy would have to have humans in it - humans who sin and make mistakes - humans who are going to get some power (be they lay people or Priests or Bishops or whatever) and there are going to be abuses. A theocracy in America or anywhere is a nice thought - but in reality, I could see it becoming like other societies where religion is part of or is the law - and there are going to be a lot of people in America who wouldn’t want anything to do with a Catholic theocracy - I can’t imagine America ever being one don’t know I would ever want to see it. Heaven may be a theocracy but we’re all put through the fires of perfection before getting there - no body down here is perfect.
God Bless
Rye
Of course most Catholics wouldn’t want to live in such a society. Many (perhaps even most) Catholics are heretics and functional apostates. They want to have contraceptive sex with their live-in girlfriends. They want to receive communion unworthily the two masses a year they actually attend. They want to drop $3 in the offertory basket and then criticize churches for not doing more to help the poor. Most Catholics, frankly, suck. Who cares what they want?

Nobody wanted gay marriage ten years ago. There practically weren’t any polls on it because it wasn’t even on people’s radars. I bet if you did one, you’d find support in the mid single-digits range, about the proportion of the population suffering from severe mental illness. Now it’s law in like a dozen and a half states and support is north of 50% in most places. Clearly, what people want doesn’t matter even in our supposedly enlightened and tolerant and democratic times: what the elites want matter.

A confessionally Catholic state would have far lower ambitions than the modern atheist liberal utilitarian one. A Catholic state would simply aim to make it difficult to commit certain sins (like adultery or blasphemy), and to make Catholicism the most respectable religion around. Our modern atheist liberal utilitarian state is actively trying to re-engineer human nature to accord with some made-up conception of the good.

If the masses of men are sinners we may as well desire a government that actually acknowledges as much and acts accordingly. The idea that we can’t do such without ushering in a benighted age of horrors is simply nonsense. There have been plenty of confessionally Catholic societies that flourished throughout history despite being run by and filled with sinners. Those societies produced thousands of saints, beautiful works of art, soul-stirring music, stunning architecture, etc. etc. – and they did this despite constant foreign invasions from murderous serial-killing Muslims, famines, the plague, etc. Modern society has given us… what, exactly, besides the corpses of 50 million infants unceremoniously flushed down their mothers’ toilets? Soul-destroyingly-ugly buildings? Avril Lavigne? “Artistic” photographs of crucifixes soaked in urine? To Hell, literally, with modern society and all the “freedoms” our cafeteria Catholic brethren desire.
 
Cause, you know, all religions are exactly alike once you brush aside all the unimportant stuff, like what they believe and why they believe it.

Not necessarily. Our dominant social creed is basically leftist atheist utilitarianism, even though true leftist atheist utilitarians are extremely rare, probably fewer than 1 in 10. Outside the universities and mass media, most people are ordinary, white, heterosexual, hard-working Christians.

People really overestimate the strength of democracy. Even in democratic nations, the people follow the elites – both in opinion and in the law. Recent history gives us plenty of examples of the state acting against the people’s wishes and the result being not the reformation of the state’s will but the deformation of the people’s wishes. Gay “marriage” is only one example of this.

Of course most Catholics wouldn’t want to live in such a society. Many (perhaps even most) Catholics are heretics and functional apostates. They want to have contraceptive sex with their live-in girlfriends. They want to receive communion unworthily the two masses a year they actually attend. They want to drop $3 in the offertory basket and then criticize churches for not doing more to help the poor. Most Catholics, frankly, suck. Who cares what they want?

Nobody wanted gay marriage ten years ago. There practically weren’t any polls on it because it wasn’t even on people’s radars. I bet if you did one, you’d find support in the mid single-digits range, about the proportion of the population suffering from severe mental illness. Now it’s law in like a dozen and a half states and support is north of 50% in most places. Clearly, what people want doesn’t matter even in our supposedly enlightened and tolerant and democratic times: what the elites want matter.

A confessionally Catholic state would have far lower ambitions than the modern atheist liberal utilitarian one. A Catholic state would simply aim to make it difficult to commit certain sins (like adultery or blasphemy), and to make Catholicism the most respectable religion around. Our modern atheist liberal utilitarian state is actively trying to re-engineer human nature to accord with some made-up conception of the good.

If the masses of men are sinners we may as well desire a government that actually acknowledges as much and acts accordingly. The idea that we can’t do such without ushering in a benighted age of horrors is simply nonsense. There have been plenty of confessionally Catholic societies that flourished throughout history despite being run by and filled with sinners. Those societies produced thousands of saints, beautiful works of art, soul-stirring music, stunning architecture, etc. etc. – and they did this despite constant foreign invasions from murderous serial-killing Muslims, famines, the plague, etc. Modern society has given us… what, exactly, besides the corpses of 50 million infants unceremoniously flushed down their mothers’ toilets? Soul-destroyingly-ugly buildings? Avril Lavigne? “Artistic” photographs of crucifixes soaked in urine? To Hell, literally, with modern society and all the “freedoms” our cafeteria Catholic brethren desire.
Ok, first of all, you say that only the elites want gay marriage then mention polls that show more than 50% of people support it. Bit of a contradiction there (though, I don’t really care, just saying).

Secondly, I question the historical accuracy of what you are saying about the “confessionally Catholic” societies. Which societies are you referring to? The European ones that were always attacking each other (and not just fighting Muslims, which basically ceased to be a threat in Western Europe, except Spain, in the 700s if I remember right).

I hate to be “that guy” but societies that were “confessionally Catholic” in the past have a lot of blood on their hands (Crusades, Inquisition, Thirty-Years War, etc).

As for societies flourishing, many pagan, Muslim, and Protestant societies have flourished and produced advances in art and science that easily rival those advances of Catholic societies.
 
From an outsider’s viewpoint (Australian, where we don’t wear our religion on our sleeve so much), you wouldn’t be the USA if you had been Catholic. For a start you had Protestant origins (Pilgrim Fathers), despite being “discovered” by a Catholic (Columbus).

Both the Protestant US and the Catholic Latin Americas were settled around the same time. But the difference in accomplishment has been startling. Exactly why this should be I don’t know, but I suspect a major difference has been what might be called the Protestant Work Ethic, plus greater freedoms.

But for the sake of the argument, a Catholic America, for it to work, would have to rely on a much greater use of (name removed by moderator)ut from the laity than the centralised Catholic Church of old. I don’t have a lot of admiration for Martin Luther, but I think there were two reasons God allowed the Protestant Reformation to go ahead - one was the speeding up of democracy, which took it’s strongest root most quickly in Protestant nations, particularly the English speaking ones, for whatever reason that was.

The other was criticism of the Bible, which in turn opened up freedom of thought in other areas.

The problem now is that we’ve seen where untrammeled freedom leads. It invariably leads to rebellion against God.

But there would be no way for example that a Pope, hoping to assert authority over a “Catholic America” could bring into being two committees on the issue of the contraceptive pill for example, then make a unilateral decision to ban it even if the committees approved it’s use for married couples (as did happen), and then expect the broad mass of educated Catholics to simpy shrug their shoulders and say “divine fiat”.

Any hope that sort of thinking would prevail would be sheer self deception, after two centuries or more of the struggle for the broad mass of the people to think and act for themselves.

And I don’t think God would even want it. He’s allowed us to develop the sort of public education we’ve got now for a reason, even if it quite often goes against Him. He wants us to make ethical decisions, and I don’t know that bringing in the form of a Catholic America would do much to alter the substance or, if you like, the way people think.

I suppose it would be possible, but there’s no way that the Church could just make unilateral decisions and expect the people to obey them without question. They’d expect to be told “why” at the very least.

I suppose this reminds me of some Prussian military figure used by George Washington to fight for him, if my TV memory is correct (Friedrich Wilhelm von Steuben?). He allegedly compared his experience in Prussia to his US experience - in Prussia he said to a soldier “Do this” and he did it. In the US he said to the soldier “Do this”, and the soldier said “Why?”. He then said, “So I told him the reason, and then he did it.”

Any hope for a Catholic America (or Australia for that matter) would face the same hurdle of independent thinking.
 
Ok, first of all, you say that only the elites want gay marriage then mention polls that show more than 50% of people support it. Bit of a contradiction there (though, I don’t really care, just saying).
As I said, ten years ago support for gay “marriage” was basically nonexistent. Now it is normative. What has changed in the interim? The difference is that the elites decided they wanted it and pushed for it. Public opinion followed. QED.
Secondly, I question the historical accuracy of what you are saying about the “confessionally Catholic” societies. Which societies are you referring to? The European ones that were always attacking each other (and not just fighting Muslims, which basically ceased to be a threat in Western Europe, except Spain, in the 700s if I remember right).
I hate to be “that guy” but societies that were “confessionally Catholic” in the past have a lot of blood on their hands (Crusades, Inquisition, Thirty-Years War, etc).
Modern society kills a million and a half babies every year – that’s in America alone. Let’s not tally up the number killed as a result of our efforts to spread “democracy” everywhere it isn’t wanted, or the numbers killed by efforts to forcibly modernize rural peoples like in Stalinist Russia or Maoist China. The numbers killed in the name of modernism are orders of magnitude greater than the numbers killed in the name of Christianity. You want to argue modern society doesn’t have blood on its hands?

The masses of men are hellbound sinners, so it seems we’re going to be soaked in blood no matter what we do. Again, we may as well have a social order that reflects this fact and endeavors to restrain the worst of men’s evils, rather than one that endorses and normalizes it in the name of a false conception of “freedom.”

Also, the Crusades were a perfectly justifiable and legitimate response to Muslim aggression and oppression of Christians.
As for societies flourishing, many pagan, Muslim, and Protestant societies have flourished and produced advances in art and science that easily rival those advances of Catholic societies.
So? The point is that confessional Catholicism is not a barrier to cultural achievement, contrary to those suggesting that the choice of confessional Catholicism is akin to the choice of institutionalized barbarism.

Those Catholic societies produced saints. Modern secular society has produced virtually none – what few have been born into it have lived lives totally opposed to modernity and have been ruthlessly slandered by modern partisans as a result – and in addition to destroying our appreciation of the sacred, it has murdered 50 million plus babies (again, in America alone!).

If you think this ought to be continued just to avoid the slim possibility of a new Inquisition (which killed, what, 4,000 people over the course of a century and a half?), by all means. I hope you’ll be able to explain this choice when you stand before God for judgment.
 
For me personally, I have no desire to live in a theocracy - at least not on Earth. I do live in America (haven’t always) and I happen to enjoy my freedom - but God also gave us freedom - freedom to make choices. All choices have consequences some good some bad. But forcing someone to uphold the Catholic Church - it really does sound like going back to the middle ages-(do you really think God had in mind forcing us to be Catholic? If He did, don’t you think He could have made our society that way?). It does remind me of some of what I heard about the first Europeans to begin colonizing America - within a couple of hundred years, everyone was so into everyon else’s business that in Salem you had witch trials. Alot of it had to do with people watching each other to see if they were doing right or wrong in the mind set of the people of the area. But granted they did choose to move to America -
But making Catholicism compulsive? I am curious, how are you going to enforce Catholic teaching? What’s the punishment going to be if I miss Mass and I’m not sick? How invasive are you going to get into people’s lives? You going to start checking out my medical records if I’m married and haven’t had a child by my 5 year anniversary? One poster didn’t seem to thing that there should be any more ‘rich’ people - so what- we’re going to divide equally among each of us - no matter who works more or who works harder? It almost sounds like something my dad used to say jokingly when I’d bring home my report card and want my suprize for doing so well - he would say “the reward for doing good is no punishment…”
Listen, I think Utopia sounded great - but it wasn’t real (perhaps it is and it’s what it’s kind of like what Heaven might be like - but without work and pain, etc)- . It was something Thomas Moore wrote about - his ideal life - which if you have like minded people going for the same goals (like I mentioned with those Europeans first coming to the American Colonies)- will be difficult enough. If you have the idea that then everyone else can leave and not be a part of it - well then you won’t need America - you might need Delaware or perhaps Rhode Island (or a state that size) - to house your theocracy. Some of what certain posters have mentioned almost sounds socialist to me.
You want to try out a Catholic Theocracy - go ahead - buy an island and try it – if you have any resources, a non Catholic society will come and rob you - will you have any military or will you simply ‘turn the other cheek’?
God Bless
Rye
 
It would simply depend on which Catholics ran the theocracy. If extremists and the ultra-orthodox ran it, it would resemble the Taliban or Saudi Arabia. If moderates ran it, along the lines of a Constitutional Theocracy, it would be a different story.
I agree with that. Plus, once such a “Catholic theocracy” would be set up, there would be a combination of extremits, ultra orthodox, moderates and even liberals. Eventually, it would be a big hot political mess like we have today. Thankfully, it’ll never happen. We already have such a mix, except that they’re not all Catholic.
 
Hmmmmmm, interesting…

It seems he’s more asking what the U.S. would look like if Catholicism was the dominate denomination (something like 99%). I do agree that most social things the church teaches against (abortion, contraception, etc) would likely be outlawed.

It also seems reasonable to conclude that canon law would be the law of the land. This would make some people quite happy and others quite angry. Also, what would happen to Catholics who dissent from it?
They’d be hauled to prison for -]torture/-] questioning, and then burned at the stake – like back when there actually were Catholic countries, with laws based on Catholic rules and laws. 😃
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top