What would happen if a non-Catholic were selected as Pope by the college of Cardinals?

  • Thread starter Thread starter x1980x
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
X

x1980x

Guest
In another thread on this forum, it is stated that the Cardinals may select a non-Bishop (or even a non-ordained man) as Pope, and said candidate would then be given all the necessary ordinations and be consecrated a Bishop.

What would happen if the Cardinals elect a non-Catholic, such as the Archbishop of Canterbury, or Billy Graham? Is such an election totally void?

I know that this would likely not happen in real life.
 
Such a thing would never happen. It is foolish to even consider it.
 
There would be a drug analysis of all of the food and drink consumed by the Cardinals. 😃
Anyway, i dont think the Archbishop of Canterbury would accept the position; and Billy Grahams getting on a bit. 🤷
 
In another thread on this forum, it is stated that the Cardinals may select a non-Bishop (or even a non-ordained man) as Pope, and said candidate would then be given all the necessary ordinations and be consecrated a Bishop.

What would happen if the Cardinals elect a non-Catholic, such as the Archbishop of Canterbury, or Billy Graham? Is such an election totally void?

I know that this would likely not happen in real life.
What makes you consider the possibility?

PS. Many of the Popes of the Early Church were elected, then ordained and consecrated, but never needed baptism.🤷
 
PS. Many of the Popes of the Early Church were elected, then ordained and consecrated, but never needed baptism.🤷
That leaves Jack Chick as a contender… well, maybe as an antipope. 😃
 
=Joan M;8076072]Such a thing would never happen. It is foolish to even consider it.
Actually such is prohibited.

Must be a Male Member

And a Member of the Colledge of Cardinals
 
Actually such is prohibited.

Must be a Male Member

And a Member of the Colledge of Cardinals
No, as has been stated above, any baptized male can be elected. While it has been nearly 700 years since a non-cardinal was elected, and that is the custom,* Universi Dominici Gregis* and its predecessor document Romani Pontifici Eligendo both provided that a non-bishop be immediately ordained to the episcopate.
 
And a Member of the Colledge of Cardinals
I was unable to find such a rule in canon law.

In answer to the OP, the pope-elect is given the opportunity to accept or decline the office. Assuming he accepts, Billy Graham, or Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, or whoever would then be ordained a bishop. If he refuses whatever process is necessary to become a bishop, he does not ascend the throne, and does not obtain the supreme power of the office until he becomes a bishop:
Can. 332 §1. The Roman Pontiff obtains full and supreme power in the Church by his acceptance of legitimate election together with episcopal consecration. Therefore, a person elected to the supreme pontificate who is marked with episcopal character obtains this power from the moment of acceptance. If the person elected lacks episcopal character, however, he is to be ordained a bishop immediately.
Thus if a person refuses confirmation and formal acceptance into the Church, power still rests with the College of Cardinals, who I assume would elect another candidate.
40.png
Chatter163:
any baptized male can be elected
Where can I find these restrictions?
 
A flock of seagulls would descend and devour him…

:eek:

requiring a new election…

Would not happen …so no need to think about it.

Sort of like asking what if the moon will turn to cheese?
 
=Chatter163;8076253]No, as has been stated above, any baptized male can be elected. While it has been nearly 700 years since a non-cardinal was elected, and that is the custom,* Universi Dominici Gregis* and its predecessor document Romani Pontifici Eligendo both provided that a non-bishop be immediately ordained to the episcopate.
your right… MEMORY LOSS:blush:
 
Wow, didn’t think about that one! all Hail the antipope!!!👍
Dont laugh! Some of the current crop of so-called "End Times" books and fake apparitions and fake locutions say that therell be an antipope. Some Garabandal supporters thought that John Paul II`s successor would be one.
Sorry! 😊
Maybe next time. 😃
 
What makes you consider the possibility?

PS. Many of the Popes of the Early Church were elected, then ordained and consecrated, but never needed baptism.🤷
yes there were instances where catechumens were elected as bishops (though I know of no papal election in such a case) and he was immediately baptized, confirmed, and ordained. Bear in mind catechumens studied for years at that time. but never was there a case where “baptism was not necessary”. It did not arise at that time but in the unlikely event since the Reformation a baptized non-Catholic was elected–and a formal process of papal elections was in effect then so this is only theoretical, not possible–he would immediately make a profession of faith, be confirmed, brought into full communion with the Church, and ordained. There is a precedent for this in the modern age with Protestant clergymen who enter the Church, discern a priestly vocation, and go on to ordination. But current rules restrict electors to the college of cardinals who are under 80, so no today it is not possible.
 
A flock of seagulls would descend and devour him…
What if one of them got offered the papacy (they were one of my favorite bands of the 80s)? I’m sure their response would be:

And I ran.
I ran so far away.
And I ran.
I ran so far away.
 
The restriction that the candidate must be baptized, that is.
I suppose there is no such restriction if we take this hypothetical situation all the way to the extreme. There, we’d realize that the only real prerequisite is to be a male who is willing and able to accept election.

–Is the man Catholic but not ordained? (Confirm and) Ordain him.
–Is he a baptized, non-Catholic? Have him profess the Faith, confirm and ordain him.
–Is he not baptized? Baptize, confirm, and ordain him.
–Is he unwilling/unable to accept election? Pick someone else.
–Is the person not male? Pick someone else.

Dan
 
yes there were instances where catechumens were elected as bishops Guess I wasn’t thinking that far back. I was kind of thinking Gregory the Great time frame. He was a deacon when elected.(though I know of no papal election in such a case) and he was immediately baptized, confirmed, and ordained. Bear in mind catechumens studied for years at that time. but never was there a case where “baptism was not necessary”. It did not arise at that time but in the unlikely event since the Reformation a baptized non-Catholic was elected–and a formal process of papal elections was in effect then so this is only theoretical, not possible–he would immediately make a profession of faith, be confirmed, brought into full communion with the Church, and ordained. There is a precedent for this in the modern age with Protestant clergymen who enter the Church, discern a priestly vocation, and go on to ordination. But current rules restrict electors to the college of cardinals who are under 80, so no today it is not possible.
This is from an artcle I found when looking for something to illustrate what I was saying.

It was a special privledge for us to do so. St. Gregory is one many popes that was a deacon when he was elected, rather than a bishop or even a priest.

You might find it interesting that from 432 – 684 thirty-seven men were elected pope. Of those the breakdown was:

Only three of them were priest or bishops at the time of election
Thirty-four were deacons when they were elected
Like Gregory, a deacon elected pope is immediately ordained a priest, and then immediately ordained a bishop. It can even be during the same liturgy that both ordinations occur.

For Gregory it took only about three hours for him to be elected pope, be ordained twice, and then assume the office of the papacy.

Today it is at least theoretically possible for a deacon to be elected pope, but it hasn’t happened for a very, very long time. In fact, even a layman can be elected pope. If he was, he would be ordained a deacon, priest & bishop, all in succession and probably during the same Mass.

It’s not terribly likely though – usually the cardinal electors choose someone that is actually in the Sistine Chapel during the balloting (though they do not have to).

Pray for us, Pope St. Gregory the Great!

My only point was that many have been elected as pope while holding the office of deacon, as St. Gregory the Great. As far as catecumens, I’m sure in the very early church this could have been the case, I’m not familiar with this though. That is what I meant by not needing baptism, they were alread baptised if they were deacons.
 
In another thread on this forum, it is stated that the Cardinals may select a non-Bishop (or even a non-ordained man) as Pope, and said candidate would then be given all the necessary ordinations and be consecrated a Bishop.

What would happen if the Cardinals elect a non-Catholic, such as the Archbishop of Canterbury, or Billy Graham? Is such an election totally void?

I know that this would likely not happen in real life.
This cannot happen because the cardinals have to elect a Catholic.
 
Those who are outside the church can’t hold an office within her - even if they appear to.

(Which is one of the arguments the people who believe the banned topic use, but that’s another story 😉 )

So for example, if Billy Graham was elected Pope and he didn’t change his beliefs, he would not be The Pope, even if everyone called him The Pope and he took to hanging out in Rome and wearing some very snazzy white clothes. However, if he did embrace the fullness of The Catholic Faith in this example, he would be Pope… but if he HAD embraced The Faith, he wouldn’t be a non-Catholic.

So I guess what I’m saying is, is possible to elect someone who is a non-Catholic at the time, but it is not possible for them to hold the office to which they have been elected, until they enter The Church.

🙂
 
I presume the question is whether or not it would be invalid for a non-Catholic to become Pope. This would assume that relevant Church regulations were suspended, such as the requirement that a candidate has to be a cardinal (if there actually is such a regulation). I am curious myself to know the answer to this question. I assume the person would have to be baptized. but about a billion non-Catholics are baptized.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top