I think the answer is a little complex. Assuming there’s no Hollywood thriller plot level election fraud, he would have gotten elected because of a majority of the electorate (or at least electoral college) supported his candidacy. That would mean he would at least have considerable public support, which might theoretically trickle down to Congress and state-level offices. What would a country that is divided enough to elect a radio demagogue look like? Maybe not that much different from now, but more polarized and desperate. Trump was able to parlay his previous media experience and exposure, and outrageous comments, into a candidacy, then a presidency. Jones is not known to that many people in the country, especially those who don’t already support a “patriot” position and mindset.
In Jones’ case, having listened to him now and then, I’d say he would withdraw the U.S. from the UN, attempt to use executive orders to overturn gun laws and disband the ATF, disband some other federal agencies, and probably order the justice department to go after left-leaning media. As for economics, I think little would change with foreign trade, outside of some token protectionism - he seems to spend little time discussing economics. Most of this would meet with strong resistance - look at our current seat-warmer’s attempts to “drain the swamp” - and he would probably continue to try to have a strong media presence. In the meantime, he would probably be wise to avoid riding in open-top limos.
The big question would be how much of the federal bureaucracy and “deep state” would resist what he would be trying to do. As a previous poster stated, governing is much harder than being an opposition party. You’re accountable, and can’t just sit in the weeds and throw manure. Also, at some level, you need the consent of the majority of the citizenry. If you look at Trump’s faltering attempts to build the wall, overturn Obamacare, and revise the tax code, it’s pretty clear that if even half the country opposes you, you’re dead in the water.