I didn’t really give my thoughts. I was merely stating what Canon Law says. While I agree that there’s a high degree of, let us say, comorbidity between failing to complete program requirements like service hours and not being prepared for confirmation, this is not really a necessary connection. In other words, not doing service hours is more a sign that one is disengaged, which might also lead one to not be prepared in the other ways. I don’t think that not doing service hours is by itself sufficient to say that someone is ipso facto unprepared for confirmation. It would strike me rather as a symptom of a larger problem, if other factors were present, namely poor class attendance, poor Mass attendance, and, most importantly, a lack of the requisite understanding for receiving the sacrament.
All that said, I think we would be better off confirming children before their First Communion, i.e. to go to “restored order.” We do this for adult converts, we confirm infants in danger of death, all of the Church’s liturgical rites make reference to the sacraments being conferred in this order (the rite of Baptism actually speaks of them in that order, Confirmation and then Communion). Confirmation isn’t about giving meaningful religious experiences to middle and high schoolers in hopes that we will hook them on the way out the door and they will still go to Church into adulthood. If we think it is that, we have failed marvelously. Confirmation is first and foremost about giving the faithful the gifts of the Holy Spirit so that they will be equipped with the capacity to live faithfully and virtuously. If we really believe the sacraments do something, then we shouldn’t hesitate to confirm at a younger age, so that those gifts will be given and the child is put on a far better trajectory far earlier. I realize it’s not a magic bullet and there are never any guarantees; the gifts must be utilized. But it strikes me as a better way of doing it.
-Fr ACEGC