F
Filii_Dei
Guest
I respectfully disagree, ProVobis. While I find plenty of reasons for restoring Latin as the language of liturgy, it making the mass a mystery doesn’t strike me as one. We may be thinking of the wrong definition of ‘mystery’. The mystery (small letter ‘m’) should not reside in a Catholic’s inability to comprehend what the priest and congregation is saying. Instead, his awe should be directed towards the proper Sacred Mysteries: the Holy Sacraments in which God imparts His divine grace to imperfect man. It is in this way that Latin imparts a sense of sacredness in the liturgy to the believer.But the vernacular was supposed to help them understand the Mass better. Funny, though, it also seemed to have taken a lot of the mystery out of the Mass as well. Perhaps not by means of the EF, but maybe we should go back to making it more of a mystery again. A community meal only works for so long.
In any case, I don’t see the use of vernacular in the Eastern churches to have “taken the mystery out of the Mass”. There’s more to this problem, like instilling Catholics with a better appreciation and understanding of Holy Tradition. We’re riding rough times with rising secularization and indifferentism in the West, while churches in Africa and Asia are filled with faithful. I believe the EF should be more widely celebrated and learned, but we shouldn’t ignore the main threats to the Church.