What would you like to ask a Catholic?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PJM
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Forgive me for going off on a slight tangent, but I think this could be used as an example in a textbook telling people about the internet (or about discussion forums, depending how you look at it). You’ve got two posters, first the original CC poster and now PJM, saying directly contradictory things. Anyone who believes that something is made true by being posted on the forum, will here be in an insoluble dilemma.

But (at the risk of stating the obvious) the truth is that, if something is true it is true whether posted on the forum or not, and if false then false whether posted on the forum or not.
Either way, my question posted here remains unanswered.

Yet, it seems you’re implying that even of it were answered, there’s a good chance the answer posted would be false.

This begs yet another question: What’s the point in asking anything on Catholic Answers Forums?
 
Hi, I’m the OP

SORRY, but I looked at prior post and could not find your questions:blush:

PLEASE either ask them again or better yet send them to me in a PM [Private Message} and I promise I WILL respond to them.

God Bless you,
Patrick [PJM]
Either way, my question posted here remains unanswered.

Yet, it seems you’re implying that even of it were answered, there’s a good chance the answer posted would be false.

This begs yet another question: What’s the point in asking anything on Catholic Answers Forums?
You keep saying that your questions are not being answered but as another poster said, no one seems to know what your questions are. Please post them again so that they can be answered.
 
Yet, it seems you’re implying that even of it were answered, there’s a good chance the answer posted would be false.
I don’t think I’m saying that, just that being posted on a forum doesn’t make something true.

To give you a better idea where I’m coming from, I have on occasion gotten into a slight argument with a friend or acquaintance over my “selective” (as it might be callled) forum participation. And yet, to me, it seems utterly absurd to think of participating on the forum without being “selective”. Consider: when you watch TV, do you simply turn the power on, and then not touch the control again until you turn it off? Of course not, and yet many posters want to do the equivalent here, I.e. they think that readers should be a captive audience to whatever anyone posts on a thread. I’ve gotten sarcastic comments about the fact that I pick and choose what to read.

(Not that I’m trying to make your forget your question, but I find this to be important as well.)
 
General notice:
Hot Topic for the week of 3/17.
Please remain on topic.
 
Yes Catholics do pray to Mary. Why do we do it? Because Mary is the most powerful human ever created. AT the wedding feast at Canna, Mary told Jesus, “They have no wine”. Jesus said, “What is it to me? My hour has not yet come”. Mary in full confidence told the servants to do whatever He asked. Jesus then changed water into wine. So Mary was able to get God the Son to do what she wanted Him to do. How powerful is that?
We pray for her intercession because she is a saint in Heaven and because she is the Mother of God, i.e., this intercession can be equated with the way Protestants ask others to pray for them, only that Mary’s intercession is so much more powerful because as I mentioned she is a saint and the mother of God.
 
I don’t have too many questions, but I would like to “Tell a Catholic:”

That while our church and the Catholic church have disagreements, that Lutherans should (and do) appreciate Catholics and the Catholic Church for remaining steadfast in protecting God’s gift of Life, and for resisting the culture as well as they have.

👍
 
I don’t have too many questions, but I would like to “Tell a Catholic:”

That while our church and the Catholic church have disagreements, that Lutherans should (and do) appreciate Catholics and the Catholic Church for remaining steadfast in protecting God’s gift of Life, and for resisting the culture as well as they have.

👍
Now that is a message of unity, peace and hope. Blessings to you and the Lutherans.
 
I don’t have too many questions, but I would like to “Tell a Catholic:”

That while our church and the Catholic church have disagreements, that Lutherans should (and do) appreciate Catholics and the Catholic Church for remaining steadfast in protecting God’s gift of Life, and for resisting the culture as well as they have.

👍
Thank you. Hope we can be one church soon.
 
How do you justify the changing of the ten commandments in the Catholic church? The way I see it is Catholics took out the second commandment against graven images because they basically didn’t want to listen to is and then split the tenth commandment to make it so there were ten again.
 
How do you justify the changing of the ten commandments in the Catholic church? The way I see it is Catholics took out the second commandment against graven images because they basically didn’t want to listen to is and then split the tenth commandment to make it so there were ten again.
The 10 commandments are not numbered but written in text form. The Catholic Church interpreted it one way (for over 2000 years) and the protestants another way (for 500 years). The second commandments for Protestants is about graven images. This is covered in the first (Catholic) commandment which states that you shall have no god above me. This includes graven images like the golden calf.

One may say that graven images includes statues but this is not true because God commanded Moses to make two statues of Cherubim to place on the Ark of the Covalent. If one were to worship statues, as was done with the golden calf, then that would be graven images. Parrying to the person that the statue represents is like keeping pictures of your kids on your wall.
 
Well here is something I’d like to ask a Catholic. What is attending a mass like? I’d imagine the experience differs from church to church, but generally what goes on during a mass on Sundays?
 
=Ryan90;11842890]Well here is something I’d like to ask a Catholic. What is attending a mass like? I’d imagine the experience differs from church to church, but generally what goes on during a mass on Sundays?
The EASY way to find out dear friend is to do it.🙂 Sit near the back so you can follow the actions; then let us know what questions you have.

The SAFE way to do it is to watch Mass on EWTN, who broadcast it a 8am, noon, 7 pm and midnight daily.

I’D LIKE TO APOLOGIZE TO ALL,

I’M THE OP BUT HAVE BEEN RECEIVING NO [ZIP ZERO] E-MAIL NOTIFICATIONS OF RESPONSES, AND CAN’T SEEM TO GET THE PROBLEM RESOLVED.

ANY SUGGESTIONS? I LOOKED AT MY PROFILE SCREES BUT DID NOT SEE ONE THAT WOULD EFFECT THIS FUNCTION.

God Bless you!
Patrick
 
Go to staff chat and ask. Email notifications are nortoriously unreliable. I disabled mine ages ago. I just log on to the forum if to see if there are any responses.
 
Could the church ever admit to being wrong on a matter of faith or morals, or would that be the end of the church because it would mean that it was not a trustworthy guide?
Which issues in particular?

“[The Church has been]promised the protection of the Holy Spirit to “guide you into all the truth” (John 16:13). That mandate and that promise guarantee the Church will never fall away from his teachings (Matt. 16:18, 1 Tim. 3:15), even if individual Catholics might.” from here: catholic.com/tracts/papal-infallibility
That’s correct. It cannot reverse a dogma that has been infallibly defined ex cathedra, by the pope/magisterium and/or by an ecumenical council. For example, the Church would not, and cannot, reverse the teaching that Jesus is the Son of God or that his body is not present in the Eucharist.

However, could they decide to allow priests to marry? Absolutely!
 
That’s correct. It cannot reverse a dogma that has been infallibly defined ex cathedra, by the pope/magisterium and/or by an ecumenical council. For example, the Church would not, and cannot, reverse the teaching that Jesus is the Son of God or that his body is not present in the Eucharist.

However, could they decide to allow priests to marry? Absolutely!
Yes, both the Pope and Magisterium are fine per the Lutheran-Catholic Dialogue as the proper institutions of the Church. Lutherans don’t accept infallibility but are very cordial with the Vatican and especially fond of the brilliant Benedict and, of -course, the whole world loves the holy Father, Francis.
 
=House Harkonnen;11791733]How did you determine that the Catholic Church is the true church without relying at least in part on your own private, fallible, interpretation?
Here are a couple of ways:

[1] We Christians Hold to the belief of ONLY One TRUE God right? [RIGHT}

Well One God can and DOES have the ability to have ONLY One set of Faith beliefs. &
its impossible that God would have waited i=until Henry the 8th, Wycliffe, Calvin, Luther, or Smith [or for that matter anyone else]; over ONE THOUSAND YEARS to introduce His One true Faith.

Faith is and must be [no other option exist] SINGULAR per defined item.

Christ following His Own OT tradition of JUST “One Chosen people”; freely and prudently choose to FOUND Only His one catholic church.

Luther himself choose to become a catholic priest before choosing to leave the only church founded by God and protected by God. [Mt. 16:15-19 & John 17: 14-20]

No where in the bible is there authority to separate from Christ Church and start a competing religion. No “Justification” for these mortal mens decision can be shown AND Proven. Certainly NOT from the bible itself.

[2] From the bible is read carefully, paying close attention to the “tense” our Good God infallibly choose to use’ READ:

Mt. 10: 1-8
Mt. 16:15-19
John 17:14-20
Mk. 16:14-15
Mt. 28:16-20
Eph. 4:4-7
Heb. 6: 1-8 [speaking here of apostates]

There is much more, but pray and ponder these two,

God Bless you, and THANKS for asking,
Patrick,
PJM.
 
Here are a couple of ways:

[1] We Christians Hold to the belief of ONLY One TRUE God right? [RIGHT}

Well One God can and DOES have the ability to have ONLY One set of Faith beliefs. &
its impossible that God would have waited i=until Henry the 8th, Wycliffe, Calvin, Luther, or Smith [or for that matter anyone else]; over ONE THOUSAND YEARS to introduce His One true Faith.

Faith is and must be [no other option exist] SINGULAR per defined item.

Christ following His Own OT tradition of JUST “One Chosen people”; freely and prudently choose to FOUND Only His one catholic church.

Luther himself choose to become a catholic priest before choosing to leave the only church founded by God and protected by God. [Mt. 16:15-19 & John 17: 14-20]

No where in the bible is there authority to separate from Christ Church and start a competing religion. No “Justification” for these mortal mens decision can be shown AND Proven. Certainly NOT from the bible itself.

[2] From the bible is read carefully, paying close attention to the “tense” our Good God infallibly choose to use’ READ:

Mt. 10: 1-8
Mt. 16:15-19
John 17:14-20
Mk. 16:14-15
Mt. 28:16-20
Eph. 4:4-7
Heb. 6: 1-8 [speaking here of apostates]

There is much more, but pray and ponder these two,

God Bless you, and THANKS for asking,
Patrick,
PJM.
Let’s take the denominations of the reformation out of the mix.

How did you determine your church is the one true church and not the Orthodox Church, or the Oriental Orthodox, without using your own private interpretation? Can not these churches claim at least as old as the RC, and have a decent argument for it?
 
Yes, both the Pope and Magisterium are fine per the Lutheran-Catholic Dialogue as the proper institutions of the Church. Lutherans don’t accept infallibility but are very cordial with the Vatican and especially fond of the brilliant Benedict and, of -course, the whole world loves the holy Father, Francis.
I noticed you are in Metro NY. Are you LCMS or ELCA?
 
=House Harkonnen;11846864]Let’s take the denominations of the reformation out of the mix.
How did you determine your church is the one true church and not the Orthodox Church, or the Oriental Orthodox, without using your own private interpretation? Can not these churches claim at least as old as the RC, and have a decent argument for it?
Thanks for asking;

[1] t is indisputable fact that Peter,was freely chosen by Christ to head His One true God; One true faith and in only One church; which follows OT tradition of One God; Faith and People.

Go back to my previous post and READ carefully the bible reference I gave.

[2] Todays Catholic [RCC] Church was the ONLY recognized form of Christianity to exist ANYWHERE in the world until the Great Eastern Schism. a Period of about ONE THOUSAND YEARS:thumbsup:

[3] Even the Early Church Fathers agreed with this:

The Early Church Fathers on
The Primacy of Peter/Rome
The Early Church Fathers understood from the beginning that Peter and his successors held a place of primacy in the Church.

Clement of Rome
Accept our counsel and you will have nothing to regret. . . . If anyone disobeys the things which have been said by him [Jesus] through us, let them know that they will involve themselves in no small danger. We, however, shall be innocent of this sin and will pray with entreaty and supplication that the Creator of all may keep unharmed the number of his elect (Letter to the Corinthians 58:2, 59:1[A.D. 95]).

Ignatius of Antioch
You [the See of Rome] have envied no one, but others have you taught. I desire only that what you have enjoined in your instructions may remain in force (Epistle to the Romans 3:1 [A.D. 110]).

Irenaeus
But since it would be too long to enumerate in such a volume as this the succession of all the churches, we shall confound all those who, in whatever manner, whether through self-satisfaction or vainglory, or through blindness and wicked opinion, assemble other than where it is proper, by pointing out here the successions of the bishops of the greatest and most ancient church known to all, founded and organized at Rome by the two most glorious apostles. Peter and Paul, that church which has the tradition and the faith which comes down to us after having been announced to men by the apostles. With that church, because of its superior origin, all the churches must agree, that is, all the faithful in the whole world, and it is in her that the faithful everywhere have maintained the apostolic tradition (Against Heresies 3:3:2 [inter A.D. 180-190]).

Clement of Alexandria
[T]he blessed Peter, the chosen, the preeminent, the first among the disciples, for whom alone with himself the Savior paid the tribute [Matt. 17:27], quickly grasped and understood their meaning. And what does he say? “Behold, we have left all and have followed you” [Matt. 19:2 7, Mark 10:28] (Who is the Rich Man That is Saved? 21:3-5 [A.D. 200]).

Tertullian
[T]he Lord said to Peter, “On this rock I will build my Church, I have given you the keys of the kingdom of heaven [and] whatever you shall have bound or loosed on earth will be bound or loosed in heaven” [Matt. 16:18-19]. … Upon you, he says, I will build my Church; and I will give to you the keys, not to the Church; and whatever you shall have bound or you shall have loose
and, not what they shall have bound or they shall have loosed (Modesty 21:9-10 [A.D. 220]).

Letter of Clement to James
Be it known to you, my lord, that Simon [Peter], who, for the sake of the true faith, and the most sure foundation of his doctrine, was set apart to be the foundation of the Church, and for this end was by Jesus himself, with his truthful mouth, named Peter, the first-fruits of our Lord, the first of the apostles; to whom first the Father revealed the Son; whom the Christ, with good reason, blessed; the called, and elect (Letter of Clement to James 2 [A.D, 221]).

Cyprian
With a false bishop appointed for themselves by heretics, they dare even to set sail and carry letters from schismatics and blasphemers to the Chair of Peter and to the principal church [at Rome], in which sacerdotal unity has its source" (Epistle to Cornelius [Bishop of Rome] 59:14 [A.D. 252]).

The Lord says to Peter: “I say to you,” he says, “that you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my Church” . . . On him he builds the Church, and to him he gives the command to feed the sheep John 21:17], and although he assigns a like power to all the apostles, yet he founded a single chair [cathedra], and he established by his own authority a source and an intrinsic reason for that unity. Indeed, the others were that also which Peter was *, but a primacy is given to Peter, whereby it is made clear that there is but one Church and one chair. So too, all [the apostles] are shepherds, and the flock is shown to be one, fed by all the apostles in single-minded accord. If someone does not hold fast to this unity of Peter, can he imagine that he still holds the faith? If he [should] desert the chair of Peter upon whom the Church was built, can he still be confident that he is in the Church? (The Unity of the Catholic Church 4 [A.D. 251]).

God Bless you, and Thanks for asking,
Patrick [PJM]*
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top