Semper Fi:
So why don’t more High Church Anglicans seek to be Anglican Use?
Semper Fi:
Many have and haven’t been welcomed. Even now, in spite of Pope JP II’s direct orders, many Archbishops (esp. in America) simply refuse to admit them. and, As soon as the parish begins to struggle, it’s often made into a Novus Ordo parish.
The Anglican Use isn’t a permanent structure, and the Book of Divine Worship is based on neither the American Missal nor the BCP 1928, but an amalgum of the 1979 BCP and some additions from the Novus Ordo by liberals who really hated the idea (the result is real dissonance to those accustomed to either the 1662 BCP (Anglican), 1928 BCP (American), or the English or American Missals).
And, just to make things worse, the Anglican Use isn’t advertised. Most Bishops do not do anything to promote it within their dioceses. Those that do have multiple AU parishes within theirs.
A sideline…
Among the options being proposed for the TAC was a
Sui Iuris Church in Union with the Holy See (Same situation as the Eastern Catholic Churches) or a
Prefecture supervised by the Holy See. If either of these had been done, the BCP’s that are standard in the TAC would have been modified under the supervision of the Holy Father or someone directly appointed by him.
From what I gather, the membership of the TAC balked big-time, and the Holy Father, in response, suggested “Intercommunion”. Apparently we didn’t do enough catechesis about why the 2 options above were the two best options for Anglicanism given the state of the rest of Anglicanism today.
I hope this answers the questions and any additional.
Pax Vobiscum, Michael