Whats the best????

  • Thread starter Thread starter Koontzy
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
K

Koontzy

Guest
What would be the best Modern day apologetic book that discusses why the RCC is the true church?

Reason being I have been reading a book a minister gave me called “the two babylons” by Hislop… Some interesting stuff… .But I would like to find a Catholic Book showing why the church is the true church. Especially one that deals with Apostolic Succession…🙂

Thanks…
 
I recommend “the Biblical Basis for the Catholic Faith” by John Salza.

God bless :byzsoc:

David
 
I highly recommend Catholicism and Fundamentalism by Karl Keating (founder of Catholic Answers). The chapter on the Papacy played a significant role in my conversion.

In fact, I happen to have an extra copy - if you IM me your mailing address I would be happy to send it to you.
 
I highly recommend Catholicism and Fundamentalism by Karl Keating (founder of Catholic Answers). The chapter on the Papacy played a significant role in my conversion.

In fact, I happen to have an extra copy - if you IM me your mailing address I would be happy to send it to you.
Thank you…I would be glad to recieve it:) I will IM you here in a few mins:)

Thank you…

God Bless
 
Reason being I have been reading a book a minister gave me called “the two babylons” by Hislop…
Oh, GROSS. I think it’s so sad that people buy into this “the RCC is the whore of babylon”—especially when it comes from a minister.

:banghead:

Books:
-Karl Keating’s Catholicism and Fundamentalism is definitely an icon. Read that! You may be interested in Upon This Rock by Steve Ray, which deals specifically with the papacy. It looks into it historically and biblically. Implicit in this is apostolic succession.
👍
 
*Summa Theologiae *by Thomas Aquinas. I think he died recently.
 
Check out “By What Authority” by Mark Shea. Essentially summarizes the conundrum faced by those who want to believe in the authority of the Bible while denying the authority of the Church.
 
He died in 1274.
If you have a really long historical sense, that’s recent. For those who do, the sentence “He died a long time ago” means he died in a year that is followed by “B.C.” 😉
 
If you have a really long historical sense, that’s recent. For those who do, the sentence “He died a long time ago” means he died in a year that is followed by “B.C.” 😉
Or in my case, a 3-digit number preceded by “A.M.” 😉
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top