While there has definitely been rabid anti-Protestant nastiness among certain individuals in the Catholic Church,
Roy5, there has certainly been at least as much – I would argue, quite a bit more – from the Protestant end of things. Just as
flower’s anecdotal experiences of religious bigotry are confined to a very small cone of vision, so are your own.
More imporantly, though I can certainly understand why you would be hostile to the strictures that you found in place pre-Vatican II, not a one of the things that you mentioned were in any sense “prejudiced” rules. The Catholic Church has traditionally taken its mission very seriously: it was, is, and ever shall be the only path to salvation. We trust in the mercy of God and hope for certain sorts of fine theological flexibilities on the other side, but this we firmly believe: this Church is the Body of Christ. This Church is the primary and ordinary source of grace on Earth. This Church is how
you are going to get to heaven. Protestants are our brothers and sisters in Christ. We share much in common with them, and we hope and pray for their reconciliation to the Truth. Protestantism as an institution, however, is only good insofar as it acknowledges the truths revealed by Christ through the Church. Insofar as it is in rebellion from Catholicism, Protestantism
per se is heresy. It is the enemy. It is a destroyer of souls. The particular damages it wreaks vary from denomination to denomination, but all of them cut themselves off from the apostolic succession, from the authority of the Holy Spirit, and from Christ and the graces He offers through the Sacraments. Protestantism is a tool of the devil, and it is absolutely to be opposed.
This we believe. We always have. We always shall.
Given that we believe this about Protestantism, is it at all surprising that many of our bishops prohibited their flocks from entering these houses of deranged reason or participating in the enemy’s rituals? Certainly, good people
do come out of the Protestant churches, and the Catholic Church, as the Body of Christ, longs for them. But the churches themselves are evil! Is it not reasonable for a bishop to say, “We want no part in your perverse worship”?
Now, these strictures were a matter of prudence, not eternal laws, and, as circumstances changed, the bishops saw reason to change some of the rules within their dioceses. This happened not directly because of Vatican II, which (while clarifying that Protestants are not totally cut off from God and the life of Christ) did not for a moment suggest that there truth in them. Rather, cultural tides and new attitudes and some wise theological judgements (and some unwise ones) led bishops to change the details of how Catholics and Protestants were to interact. I approve of the changes that allowed Catholics to attend Protestant baptisms and weddings, because those are valid sacraments even in rebel churches. And I think the absolute ban on entry into Protestant churches created too many prudential problems in communities where the Protestant worship space was used as a meeting hall. But Protestant confirmations? Sunday worship? Nothing good comes of Catholics attending false sacraments which only
confirm Protestants in their sinful ways. Catholics to this day are not supposed to receive Protestant communion, and that is unlikely to change, ever.
Another rule still in place: the pledge to raise the children Catholic. This remains a major part of the Church’s teaching on marriage, in fact. And of course it is! What kind of a responsible Church would we be if we said, “Well, yes, Protestantism is the work of Satan, but feel free to raise your kids in it.” We’d be insane! Sadly, enforcement of the pledge is not what it used to be – but the requirement is definitely still on the books.
I’m not familiar with the “scurrilous lies” told about Luther and Calvin. The only one I know is the one about Luther’s anti-Semitism, but that one’s true. (But, hey, who wasn’t an anti-Semite back then?)
Also of note is the fact that, unless I am much mistaken, the Catholic Church still stands by every word of the
Syllabus of Errors, insofar as it summarizes those documents which it cites. There is nothing in it which is inconsistent with more recent encyclicals, although anyone who reads the Syllabus should be advised to read the cited texts for contexts before commenting on it.
You are absolutely right about at least one thing, though: Jesus instructed us to love God and to love one another. All else is secondary. It’s just that loving someone isn’t the same as accepting everything they do. In fact, true love will embrace the person and reject their sin.
And, however you want to slice the semantics (and there are a lot of indirect ways of saying this, and many qualifications you could add about invincible ignorance and all that, but still
being a Protestant is a sin.
The Church believes that. The Church acts on it. That’s not prejudice; it’s our truest, fullest expression of love.
Why don’t you come join us? We do have that whole valid sacraments / priesthood / Body of Christ thing going on, which is sweet times.
Having said all this, I heartily agree with you that Catholics should not engage in false bashing of Protestants or Protestantism. We need to never compromise the truth we teach, but we must always teach in honesty and, above all, charitable love.
That’s probably not the most pleasant post you’ve ever read, but I hope it clarifies some things.
If my fellow-Catholics think I’ve gone too far with anything I’ve said here, please go ahead and comment – hopefully in a spirit of fraternal correction!