G
GKMotley
Guest
There you go.
Ah.Do you just pray the Holy Mary or pray those prayers with “tell your grace”
Example: Our Lady Of Guadalupe Prayer
Our Lady of Guadalupe, mystical rose, make intercession for the Holy Church, protect the Sovereign Pontiff, help all those who invoke thee in their necessities, and since thou art the ever Virgin Mary and Mother of God, obtain for us from thy most holy Son the grace of keeping our faith, sweet hope in the midst of the bitterness of life, burning charity and the precious gift of final perseverance. Amen.
And that particular practice is not a rarity by any means.Or, from another perspective, the singing of the Angelus, which used to follow every Sunday Mass in my parish, is now done as a spoken prayer, after Wednesday night Mass.
In my case, no, though the devotion to St Joseph I use is from an Anglican book, St Augustine’s Prayer Book. No idea if it has a Catholic source. In terms of the type of content, it’s the same idea.But you don’t have problem in make catholic prays for saints or has one anglican mode for saints prayers
Is this an official doctrine or dogma, or just a common view? Because the idea that literally all grace is directly meted out by Mary seems to go too far. I have also heard it explained by a RC priest as meaning that Mary, in bringing Christ into the world, then mediated all graces to the world.Mary is also the “mediatrix of all graces” as she is tasked by God with distributing graces to mankind.
No kidding. Try talking to Anglicans about being pro-life. You’d think I was Satan. It just might drive me back to the RC church.No accounting for what some Anglicans might do.
Took me a minute to find (my usual link wasn’t working):Please, post your St Joseph prayer.
Any Catholic would enjoy much of St Augustine’s Prayer Book. Highly recommended.Beautiful prayer.
I sure hope that option 1 isn’t a requirement, if so that’ll be my first really tough thing to make it through for the faith in a while. I’ve always balked quite heavily at that interpretation for a while now. Your second option as explained by some priests is always how I roll with the “mediatrix of all graces” route if I have to confront it. I have no problem with people who believe option one, but it’s not one I find useful to my spiritual life.Tis_Bearself:![]()
Is this an official doctrine or dogma, or just a common view? Because the idea that literally all grace is directly meted out by Mary seems to go too far. I have also heard it explained by a RC priest as meaning that Mary, in bringing Christ into the world, then mediated all graces to the world.Mary is also the “mediatrix of all graces” as she is tasked by God with distributing graces to mankind.
Version 2 is perfectly fine to me. It would take some effort to convince me that version 1 doesn’t replace Christ with Mary.HopkinsReb:![]()
I sure hope that option 1 isn’t a requirement, if so that’ll be my first really tough thing to make it through for the faith in a while. I’ve always balked quite heavily at that interpretation for a while now. Your second option as explained by some priests is always how I roll with the “mediatrix of all graces” route if I have to confront it. I have no problem with people who believe option one, but it’s not one I find useful to my spiritual life.Tis_Bearself:![]()
Is this an official doctrine or dogma, or just a common view? Because the idea that literally all grace is directly meted out by Mary seems to go too far. I have also heard it explained by a RC priest as meaning that Mary, in bringing Christ into the world, then mediated all graces to the world.Mary is also the “mediatrix of all graces” as she is tasked by God with distributing graces to mankind.