J
jbuck919
Guest
I was watching the EWTN Mass the other night with my 86-year-old mother who (for good reasons) enjoys it and is just short of a shut-in. Many here would agree that it is a worthy celebration, but we both almost collapsed sideways out of our chairs from the length and pointlessness of the so-called homily, and I have to say that this abuse (I will call it that) has long been more the rule than the exception.
I can count on the fingers of one hand the number of homilies I have ever heard that were an enhancement to worship rather than an interruption. (For those too young to know, the sermon as it was then called was in fact formerly an interruption to liturgy and one could read one’s favorite junk novel during it without being irreverent, though I suppose that would have been impolite… The modern homily is considered the conclusion of the liturgy of the word and is, unfortunately, in the improvisatory hands of whoever is delivering it.)
I have to think that many people are kept away from Mass because they don’t want to have to listen to 25 minutes of pure boredom from Father so-and-so. Why is this problem not more frequently and more seriously addressed?
I can count on the fingers of one hand the number of homilies I have ever heard that were an enhancement to worship rather than an interruption. (For those too young to know, the sermon as it was then called was in fact formerly an interruption to liturgy and one could read one’s favorite junk novel during it without being irreverent, though I suppose that would have been impolite… The modern homily is considered the conclusion of the liturgy of the word and is, unfortunately, in the improvisatory hands of whoever is delivering it.)
I have to think that many people are kept away from Mass because they don’t want to have to listen to 25 minutes of pure boredom from Father so-and-so. Why is this problem not more frequently and more seriously addressed?