N
netmilsmom
Guest
It’s because we are SSSSSOOOOOO blessed!BTW, Brendan and netmil(name removed by moderator), are you finding it as amusing as I am that this thread has turned into somewhat of a SS C&M gabfest?![]()
It’s because we are SSSSSOOOOOO blessed!BTW, Brendan and netmil(name removed by moderator), are you finding it as amusing as I am that this thread has turned into somewhat of a SS C&M gabfest?![]()
One other tradition they have: whenever one of them enters the Sacristy, they say “Praise to you Lord Jesus Christ” and anyone in the Sacristy responds “Now and Forever”Brendan, I’ve overheard bits and pieces of this prayer, and I’ve never heard it at any other parish (but then again, before conversion, I wasn’t paying attention the way I do now).
He’s a great conversationalist as well.Thanks for the nice complement, he is a really good son and big brother to his sisters![]()
Indeed he is! Remember the kind of day my daughter L was having after her baptism? I credit Brendan’s son with calming her down (well, Fr. marching hand-in-hand out of the church with her didn’t hurt, either!)He’s a great conversationalist as well.
I mean, he and I talked and he is very mature.
Were you there during the Lenten Mission two years ago?One other tradition they have: whenever one of them enters the Sacristy, they say “Praise to you Lord Jesus Christ” and anyone in the Sacristy responds “Now and Forever”
He’s 8 and you guys are embarassing meHe’s a great conversationalist as well.
I mean, he and I talked and he is very mature.
How old is he now? Is he doing the Christmas Play?
I’m herding the Shepherds.
(and my Net will not be Mary,sniff, sniff but is going to reprise her role as the 1st female shepherd in the entire history of our parish. Father Ben said, shepherds need wives too!)
God does not call women or men to be readers or EMHCs. People choose to do these things of their own free will. They are not vocations.
No way! Which priest was it? Too bad I was still on the outside looking in at that point.Were you there during the Lenten Mission two years ago?
One of the EWTN Priests was there.
He got up into the Pulput and said,
“Praise Be to Jesus Christ.”
And the parish answered
“Now and Forever.”
He smiled and said, “I love doing that!”
(He then bragged about us on EWTN during the Homily of the following Saturday’s Mass)
My girls want to come to the baptism. Please make sure you keep us informed of which mass you’ll be at!!!He’s 8 and you guys are embarassing me![]()
As far as the Christmas party, probably not. We have a baby due in a 2 weeks, and being our 5th, we’re prepared for her to come any day now. So we aren’t making any plans at all for much of anything![]()
The Doctor is right on that one. A vocation is a calling to a particular STATE; priesthood, diaconate, married life, single life, religious.So you know what God calls people to be
! I happen to think that God calls us to many things, especially our professions. Parents are supposed to ask their teens frequently what God is calling them to do with their lives.
No problem. We’re still working out all the details (depending on when the baby comes, of course)My girls want to come to the baptism. Please make sure you keep us informed of which mass you’ll be at!!!
No, we only found that parish about a year ago. I was at Mass last Sept. when Fr. Pablo Straub said the Mass. He was in town as was told by the other EWTN priests that he had to visit our church.Were you there during the Lenten Mission two years ago?
I think we agree here. Altar serving in itself does not make church vocations. But I would agree that it provides assistance in “planting a seed” or discerning a call. Heck, I was discerning a call very strongly to become a sister for 2-3 years. When one serves at the Mass, one can develop a profound reverence for the Eucharist and deep understanding of the parts of the Mass. One excercises stewardship of the liturgy in a very physical way. And stewardship of the God’s mysteries is one of the very important aspects of a call to religious life.This is what the Vatican had to say on that subject (see my link above)
Service at the altar might not be the only factor, but the Vatican itself states that it provides “well known assistace” in encouraging future priestly vocations.
No, I am not studied enough to give you a chapter/verse prooftext of my informed opinion from some Vatican document.Do you have any documentation from the Vatican on that CB?
I can answer your question with the answer I think you’d like to hear: My home parish currently has 0 novices or candidates to orders. (That I know of, anyway.)And I would also put the same question to you. How many vocations to the priesthood, diaconate, or religious life (male and female) has your parish produced in the last 5 years?
In the Vatican journal Notitiæ, the liturgical scholar we have already mentioned, Aimé-Georges Martimort, affirms that [the] general discipline of the Church [against female altar service] has been set in stone by canon 44 of the Collection of Laodicea which dates generally from the end of the 4th century and which has figured in almost all canonical collections of East and West. 3 Martimort also recalls that Popes ever since St. Gelasius in 494 had denounced this practice as an abuse. It appears there were already feminist influences making themselves felt in Sicily and southern Italy at that time, and Pope St. Gelasius felt obliged to write to the bishops of those regions saying We have heard with sorrow of the great contempt mépris] with which the sacred mysteries have been treated. It has reached the point where women have been encouraged to serve at the altar, and to carry out roles that are not suited to their sex, having been assigned exclusively to those of masculine gender. 4 Every edition of the Roman Missal from 1570 till 1962 carried the prohibition of female altar servers, as did the 1917 Code of Canon Law (c. 813, §2), not to mention the documents of the post-conciliar liturgical reform in their earlier and less radical phase.This is a great article, a bit long, but well worth the read:
rtforum.org/lt/lt88.html
A smal piece taken from the article:
I’m at that parish.Now, Brendan, you can answer my question:How good is your parish’s program of catechesis? If you recall, my theory is that this is more important to an increase of vocations than anything else.
How?Girls get all the nurturing and shining opportunities. They are constantly puffed up and told how special they are.
I can offer you that our tradition teaches that the Eucharist is a re-presentation of the sacrifice on Calvary. And if I recall correctly, tradition also teaches that men and women were actively present and serving him during Jesus’ passion and crucifixion.
Who helped (rather involuntarily) Jesus shoulder his cross?
Oh, yeah, it was a man. Simon.
Who (rather heroically) busted through the crowds and past the guards to wipe Jesus’ unrecognizable face? Oh, yeah, it was a woman. Veronica.
Your spin on the Passion narative is not an argument from Tradition. What Veronica did was great (certainly) but it was not liturgical, neither was what Simon did for that matter. You cannot say what people should do at Mass by trying to make it a Passion play (or a recreation of the Last Supper as other people seem to be hell-bent on). That is not what re-presentation means.Yes, in light of our tradtion, males and females have complementary roles as servers in the liturgy.
Martimort also recalls that Popes ever since St. Gelasius in 494 had denounced this practice as an abuse. It appears there were already feminist influences making themselves felt in Sicily and southern Italy at that time, and Pope St. Gelasius felt obliged to write to the bishops of those regions saying
This would be an argument from Tradition.We have heard with sorrow of the great contempt [mépris] with which the sacred mysteries have been treated. It has reached the point where women have been encouraged to serve at the altar, and to carry out roles that are not suited to their sex, having been assigned exclusively to those of masculine gender. 4
You are correct in the assumption that you cannot be disobedient of there is no obligation to obey. If a priest choses not to use girl alter servers he is not disobeying. I would say that if you leave a parish because they use alter servers, depending on how you do it, it could be considered a form of civil disobedience since you are doing it as a form of protest.That’s the second time I have heard that. And I will also pose the question to you.
Were exactly is any disobedience? As I pointed out before, the Vatican allowed altar girls, but with the provisio that no priest be obligated to use them,
So if a priest doesn’t use altar girls, is he being disobedient.
In addition, the Code of Canon Law allows a Catholic to register and attend Mass at ANY parish. If a Catholic chooses to attend Mass only at parishes that do not use altar girls, is that being disobedient?
No one is doubting that is is accepted or allowed. What we are discussing is if it is good idea. The Vatican allows us to do so.
Is that the only way for her to give back, is it the most effective way of giving to both the parish and the Church as a whole. That is what we are discussing.
You set up a strawman. I think that most of us have put forward a more intelligent and well developed argument than that. No one claims it is “wrong” as far as legal or moral issues go. However, prudentially, it does certainly seem misguided and done for less than stellar reasons.My point though, is the irony of some who trust the Church in major things of faith/morals and their afterlife but bad mouth it because of perceived liturgical abuses (if it’s allowed it’s not an abuse is it?) Is it just me or isn’t there irony there? " I trust the church with my soul and will obey it and accept it’s teachings but I know better than it does when it comes to allowing girl alter servers and that’s wrong!" A little ironic maybe.