F
FuzzyBunny116
Guest
Why does everyone seem to be against them so much?
The Catholic Church has approved their use so nothing is “wrong” with the use of female altar servers. (Whether or not female serve at any given Mass is up to the local bishop and the actual priestly celebrant for said Mass.)Why does everyone seem to be against them so much?
It must be something in the (holy) water!…said people should find-out just how other parishes have thriving, well-trained legions of male altar servers.
My church does – have plenty of male altar servers, that is. We also have female altar servers, but not as many as the males. Maybe the fact that we can maintain so many boys in this ministry is due to the presence of the older altar servers – these are the older teenage boys and the young men who are still altar servers. They serve as guides and mentors for the younger ones, and I think this could go a long way towards alleviating the problem of young boys thinking that serving at the altar is becoming just a “girl’s” ministry.…said people should find-out just how other parishes have thriving, well-trained legions of male altar servers.
That is the argument one often hears in support of female atar servers. Coincidentally, it usually comes in response to the opposing side’s point that young men who serve at Mass may be inspired to enter the priesthood.The young girls can still participate for a while but maybe long enough to get interested in serving God and go on to maybe being a nun.
Because it began as an abuse and, after nearly two decades, Rome finally caved and approved them. Something that starts as a “thumb your nose at Rome” statement should not then be blessed by Rome. I understand why Rome did it, for the same reason they caved on Communion in the hand. But it still began as prideful, willful disobedience.Why does everyone seem to be against them so much?
WOW, two posts today which I have read that really hit the nail on the head.Because it began as an abuse and, after nearly two decades, Rome finally caved and approved them. Something that starts as a “thumb your nose at Rome” statement should not then be blessed by Rome. I understand why Rome did it, for the same reason they caved on Communion in the hand. But it still began as prideful, willful disobedience.
I don’t know, but I think its a plea for the past, nostalgic urges at work. A little short sighted.Why does everyone seem to be against them so much?
ain’t gonna happen. gotta be ordained.I don’t know, but I think its a plea for the past, nostalgic urges at work. A little short sighted.
The Magesterium has o.k.'ed the altar service of girls, and I think they realize that this work might help at least some of the girls discern a calling to serve as adult women as readers or Eucharistic Ministers of Holy Communion.
There are a lot of older women doing EMHC work, many are going to have to be replaced sooner than we think.Extraordinary Ministers… now that we already have (too many of)
God does not call women or men to be readers or EMHCs. People choose to do these things of their own free will. They are not vocations.I don’t know, but I think its a plea for the past, nostalgic urges at work. A little short sighted.
The Magesterium has o.k.'ed the altar service of girls, and I think they realize that this work might help at least some of the girls discern a calling to serve as adult women as readers or Eucharistic Ministers of Holy Communion.
Excellent point. This is especially important in areas with large populations where in addition to the hospitals and nursing homes, you have entire high-rise apartment buildings full of senior citizens – many homebound.Do any of the people who posted who believe that there are too many EMHCs realize that this ministry encompasses bringing the Eucharist to the homebound and hospitalized?
There is no way a parish with one Priest could ever accomplish that alone.
At the parishes I have belonged to, the EMHCs who do this sick and homebound ministry are women. It would be very sad to see these numbers diminish for any reason.
Then let them stick to hospitals and the homebound. Why must they prance around the sanctuary like they’re co-priests?Do any of the people who posted who believe that there are too many EMHCs realize that this ministry encompasses bringing the Eucharist to the homebound and hospitalized?
There is no way a parish with one Priest could ever accomplish that alone.
At the parishes I have belonged to, the EMHCs who do this sick and homebound ministry are women. It would be very sad to see these numbers diminish for any reason.
No prob, Mr. S. :tiphat:WOW, two posts today which I have read that really hit the nail on the head.
Thanks Dr B
Well, when I was in a Catholic Hospital having my second child, a nun brought me Communion.Do any of the people who posted who believe that there are too many EMHCs realize that this ministry encompasses bringing the Eucharist to the homebound and hospitalized?
There is no way a parish with one Priest could ever accomplish that alone.
At the parishes I have belonged to, the EMHCs who do this sick and homebound ministry are women. It would be very sad to see these numbers diminish for any reason.