D
David_B
Guest
My favorite Eucharistic Prayer is #1, also known as the Roman Canon. The few times I’ve heard it I’ve been struck by the number of early saints that are mentioned…It’s hard for me to describe but it just seems cool.
That brings up a good point…why are the saints names optional in the number 1 today? With the other eucharistic prayers there would be shorter alternatives…if it ain’t broke why fix it?The Roman Canon with none of the saints names left out. I also like no 4 because of the biblical references. These two are the least said though because they would make the Mass a couple of minutes longer.![]()
I’ve actually heard it suggested that the reason why most priests seem to use EP II is not because it is shorter but because the other EPs (especially the Roman Canon) are much more clear in proclaiming the Catholic faith (invocation of angels and saints for instance as well as being more clear that a sacrifice is taking place) and this makes alot of priests (particularly the older ones) very uncomfortable.The Roman Canon with none of the saints names left out. I also like no 4 because of the biblical references. These two are the least said though because they would make the Mass a couple of minutes longer.![]()
The associate pastor at my soon to be former parish ALWAYS uses EP I in its complete form. I don’t know if it is due to any theological reason but I do know that he is dyslexic and he seems to have it memorized.That brings up a good point…why are the saints names optional in the number 1 today? With the other eucharistic prayers there would be shorter alternatives…if it ain’t broke why fix it?
Those are not translation at all. The Roman Canon is what makes the Latin Rite the Latin Rite. EPII and EPIII stinks. EPIV Is ok and is syriac in origin.The text for the Eucharistic Prayers can be found on the following sites:
Eucharistic Prayer I (The Roman Canon)
catholicliturgy.com/index.cfm/FuseAction/Text/Index/4/SubIndex/67/ContentIndex/22/Start/9
Eucharistic Prayer II
catholicliturgy.com/index.cfm/FuseAction/Text/Index/4/SubIndex/67/ContentIndex/23/Start/9
Eucharistic Prayer III
catholicliturgy.com/index.cfm/FuseAction/Text/Index/4/SubIndex/67/ContentIndex/24/Start/9
Eucharistic Prayer IV
catholicliturgy.com/index.cfm/FuseAction/Text/Index/4/SubIndex/67/ContentIndex/25/Start/9
These sites give the Latin and English.
James 0235, I think you’re on to something. I seldom hear the Roman Canon used at Mass. That’s not to say that the others Eucharistic prayers are deficient, but I do think that the Roman Canon conveys a more reverent and sacrificial attitude. Since after Vatican II, some elements–modernists–within the Church have tried to downplay the sacrificial nature of the Eucharist. I’ve also noticed a lot more ad-libbing in the use of the others Eucharistic prayers. I like it when the priest mentions all of the saints that ahve been included in the Roman Canon.I’ve actually heard it suggested that the reason why most priests seem to use EP II is not because it is shorter but because the other EPs (especially the Roman Canon) are much more clear in proclaiming the Catholic faith (invocation of angels and saints for instance as well as being more clear that a sacrifice is taking place) and this makes alot of priests (particularly the older ones) very uncomfortable.
James