S
Sirach2
Guest
I trust that Jesus’ words to His apostles are still true today. I am in the habit of obtaining plenary indulgences for the Poor Souls, so I question one of the Church’s stipulations that one must have been to confession 20 days either before or after the work is performed in order to gain the plenary. Since I am usually in the state of grace, I asked a priest in confession whether or not this rule applies to me, since I am not always able to get to confession in that time period, but I still wish to assist the Poor Souls with a daily plenary.
He said: “You’re good!” To be sure, I asked again, “Does that mean I do not have to observe the 20-day rule and my plenary is still obtained?” He said YES. We are told by the Vatican that a confessor may commute the requirements due to “impediments.” I was not aware of any impediments, other than to say that since I had not been to confession in the time period of 20 days, I was not performing any grant to obtain a plenary indulgence, and it saddened me.
I go back to Jesus’ words that in the mouth of His priest, this obligation is “loosed” in heaven, also. But on the chance that my indulgences will be only partial due to misunderstanding him, does anyone have a sense of the rightness of my pastor’s counsel?
He said: “You’re good!” To be sure, I asked again, “Does that mean I do not have to observe the 20-day rule and my plenary is still obtained?” He said YES. We are told by the Vatican that a confessor may commute the requirements due to “impediments.” I was not aware of any impediments, other than to say that since I had not been to confession in the time period of 20 days, I was not performing any grant to obtain a plenary indulgence, and it saddened me.
I go back to Jesus’ words that in the mouth of His priest, this obligation is “loosed” in heaven, also. But on the chance that my indulgences will be only partial due to misunderstanding him, does anyone have a sense of the rightness of my pastor’s counsel?