Anyone seen âThe Bells of St. Maryâsâ? It has a scene in it where Father Oâ Malley enters the classroom and everyone stands, and the nun offers him her chair, and he takes it.
I thought the standing thing was good, but was surprised when the priest took the nunâs (womanâs) chair. In my experience it wouldâve been correct for him to thank her, but decline. Any comments?
I think that there was perhaps a much stronger sense in those days that sisters were âlowerâ than priests, that she was showing him honor by giving up her seat to him, and that he was showing not arrogance or bad manners, but accepting a dignity due his station. I think this is hard to understand now, and that feminism has had a lot to do with it. Nowadays women in the US are brought up not to expect men to unlock their car doors or pull out a chair for them or go around and open their car door for them, etc., help them on with their coats, find them a chair if they are standing, stand when they enter the room, etc. So the whole business of standing when anyone enters the room can seem alien.
When I was in school (1970s), it wasnât just the children who stood when the priest entered, but the teacher, too - lay or religious. Then the ill winds of âthe spirit of Vatican IIâ blew through our parish (meaning our old-school Monsignor retired and âFather Bobâ with his open-collars and crucifix dangling among his chest hairs took over). I remember the confusion we kids felt, when we did as we were trained, and stood up to say (sing-song), âGood MORNing FATHer!â and were told to be seated and we didnât have to stand for him, he was just an ordinary grown-up, etc. We KNEW, somehow, deep down, that he was NOT âjust an ordinary grown-up,â and besides, many of us had been taught to be respectful to ALL grown-ups. It was like the priests had abdicated the dignity of their priesthood in exchange for wanting to be âone of the gangâ with the kids. We didnât like it. It was around that time that we started to think that anyone in religious life was âweirdâ and âstrange.â They had abandoned the dignity of their position as adults - and as priests and religious (the sisters were similar), and we knew something was wrong with it.
A funny thing for me in this is that as I grew up, I absorbed the feminist mentality while all the time thinking I was by no means a feminist, and having no sympathy with feminism. I moved to Poland about 17 years ago, and got a jolt. Here, men are gentlemen, and women are ladies. When men dropped what they were doing to help me on with my coat or to take a parcel from me and carry it for me, or when my male students (I teach in a college) stood up and BOWED when I came into the room (the most well-bred of them, anyway), I was floored! They donât bow anymore, but they are most respectful. A few weeks ago, I was chatting to a male student for about half an hour, when he suddenly got a horror-stricken look on his face and said, 'I just realized Iâve been sitting all this time and I didnât get you a chair!"
Iâve got used to the wonderful gentlemanliness of Polish men, but it creates a moments of awkwardness for me because I also work with priests, and my confessor is a bishop. Because of my early training, I just CANNOT sit down before a priest sits. But because these priests are Polish gentlemen, they CANNOT sit down before a lady sits. When I meet the bishop for confession, I have to sit before he does, or heâll be uncomfortable. After all these years, Iâm still very conscious of forcing myself to sit first, before the priests I work with or the bishop when we meet privately.
I think that the original posterâs students will probably stand up on reflex NEXT year, when the priest comes to the classroom, and the teacher will either have to tell them not to, or the teacher will realize that itâs good, and let it continue.