When did early Christianity become corrupt if it ever did?

[Servant19]

Obviously if we were on the same sheet of music as
to the identity of Christ and what he wants to accomplish
you would not be Bahai. Lol.
Facts: the divisiveness does not come from me.
It comes from Him. Consider the following:
I will sift them like wheat, seperating the chaff and
throwing it in the fire.
I bring division, a sword. Households will be divided
against each other on account of my Name.
I will seperate the sheep from the goats with the
sheep on my right and goats on my left.
Etc etc.

Does that sound like someone who is just interested
in our human world having the warm fuzzy feeling? I’m ok you are ok?

Secondly you come here to Catholic Answers to
correct our thinking about the Resurrection. We
say nope. Christ really did die physically and he
really did resurrect physically but you insist
this is just a trivial point of disagreement in man
made doctrine so let’s just set it aside and get along.

But we can’t simply because your Christ is NOT
our Christ but more of a Hollywood producer
singing we are the world.
He bears very little that is recognizable to the
person we know as Lord.

I believe the “sifting” is found in the words:

"Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven.

…ONLY the one, not some will, some won’t…ONLY THE ONE.

…what is the will of the Father? Making it sound like a Hollywood production is disrespectful and patronising dear sister, towards the yearning, heartfelt toiling and sweat, blood and tears of those who have given up so much for what is in reality what adherents of ALL religions have prayed for for thousands of years.

“…on earth as it is in heaven…”

“…and the government shall be upon His shoulders…”

It’s not a warm fuzzy feeling, it’s facing the reality of the current world impasse of not wanting to forgo theologies, and seizing the empowerment of the Holy Spirit in order to act, not speak words and teach, but act.

The world is tired of teachings being given by those who cannot live the life. Unrighteousness and teachings do not go together.

The WILL of the Father…

.

 

[marywarfield]

I believe the “sifting” is found in the words:

"Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven.

…ONLY the one, not some will, some won’t…ONLY THE ONE.

…what is the will of the Father? Making it sound like a Hollywood production is disrespectful and patronising dear sister, towards the yearning, heartfelt toiling and sweat, blood and tears of those who have given up so much for what is in reality what adherents of ALL religions have prayed for for thousands of years.

“…on earth as it is in heaven…”

“…and the government shall be upon His shoulders…”

It’s not a warm fuzzy feeling, it’s facing the reality of the current world impasse of not wanting to forgo theologies, and seizing the empowerment of the Holy Spirit in order to act, not speak words and teach, but act.

The world is tired of teachings being given by those who cannot live the life. Unrighteousness and teachings do not go together.

The WILL of the Father…

.

The WILL of the Father is you follow the Son. Period.
That is the Fathers only will.
But how can you do that if you deny the very
identity as trivial man made dogmas?
And btw do you not believe that trivializing
the identity of Christ is not also “patronizing”?

It is insulting to every Roman Catholic to say “hey
we believe only in a spiritual death and resurrection,
but hey that is just minor disagreement don’t
worry your pretty little head over it”?
Patronizing in the extreme yes.
Furthermore, since you seem to have very little
grasp on how important the differences are or that
they even exist, why are you judging them as expendable
in the first place?

 

[Gabriel_of_12]

I always wanted to have this question answered, but no one ever really addresses it for me sweet sister rinnie.

Were Peter to have died BEFORE Jesus’ resurrection, would it have mattered if he did not believe in the Resurrection of Jesus?
What made Peter recognize and acknowledge ALL TRUTH before Jesus’ resurrection had taken place?

.

Jesus is Truth. The answer to your question, proves the death and resurrection of Jesus.

The Word of God became flesh so that the only begotten Son of God can die and set the captives free who were in death before His coming, who believed the prophets who proclaimed God’s promises to set them free.

Those before Jesus believed in Truth and that Truth Himself will reveal all things including death, resurrection and eternal life.

Do you not know that Jesus went into death to redeem all those before His revelation and coming like Peter, who believed in His coming and the promises of God?

The Will of God is in Jesus, for all things are subject to Him (God) because all things came through Him (The Word).

The flesh is subject to the Will of God according to His creation laws. Jesus never suffered corruption of His flesh in death, thus all of creation submits to the Will of God in the Word of God Incarnate ,Jesus Himself.

Your view of God’s Will is new and not according to the revelations of God made known in Truth Himself, Jesus Christ crucified in the flesh and resurrected in the flesh.

Peace be with you

 

[Eric_Hilbert]

Thread off topic.
Closed