When did praying the Rosary begin

  • Thread starter Thread starter coco2
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Whilst out walking I sometimes break off a twig from a bush or tree and play with it in my hand. I find it helps focus the mind. I wonder is this is how the Rosary started - but then there’s the story of Our Lady appearing to St Dominic to consider.

Christian Meditation started by Fr John Maine O.S.B. is worth investigating. He went travelling through the East to find a form of early meditation that may be useful for Western Christians.

The mystical Doctor of the Church St John of the Cross suggests at the higher reaches of prayer the Rosary may become an obstruction; but it never got in the way of St Padre Pio.
 
Thank you for the corrections you have made. Seems there are many theories and investigations of which I was not aware until you posted.

Peace
The story that’s in New Advent has been around for many years. However, the Dominican Order has said that “it’s a nice story, but it never happened.” Dominic did not have anything to do with the rosary and was not familiar with it.

There was a custom of praying with pebbles, stones or beans. I’m not sure which one. But it was not structured as we know it today. There was a ruling by the religious orders of the day that allowed the Paters to be prayed by those who did not know how to read the breviary. It is said that the monks and friars kept count using these pebbles or whatever they were, to keep track of the number of Paters.

I would go with what the Dominicans say about their own tradition over what other writers say only because they are experts in their particular school of spirituality.

There was a recent link posted on AAA to a summary statement answering a very similar question. Maybe people can look it up. I don’t know how to do searches on CAF.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
The story that’s in New Advent has been around for many years. However, the Dominican Order has said that “it’s a nice story, but it never happened.” Dominic did not have anything to do with the rosary and was not familiar with it.

There was a custom of praying with pebbles, stones or beans. I’m not sure which one. But it was not structured as we know it today. There was a ruling by the religious orders of the day that allowed the Paters to be prayed by those who did not know how to read the breviary. It is said that the monks and friars kept count using these pebbles or whatever they were, to keep track of the number of Paters.

I would go with what the Dominicans say about their own tradition over what other writers say only because they are experts in their particular school of spirituality.

There was a recent link posted on AAA to a summary statement answering a very similar question. Maybe people can look it up. I don’t know how to do searches on CAF.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
I found the article that was published by Catholic Answers that gives a brief over view of the Rosary and the Carthusian, Dominican and Franciscan connection with the Rosary.

catholic.com/thisrock/2002/0212fea4sb1.asp

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
Thank you JReducation. And to think, I supposed it had something to do with The Book Of Revelation chapter 21, verse 11.
 
Thank you JReducation. And to think, I supposed it had something to do with The Book Of Revelation chapter 21, verse 11.
Don’t be too quick to discard that thought. Remember, John had visions that he communicated to his disciples. These visions were often in allegorical images. Many of them foreshadowed things to come.

While it may not be the case that the Holy Rosary was created in response to what is written in Revelation, it can be the case that what is written foreshadowed the Church’s devotion and love for the Mother of God.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
Thank you.
I think it was at Fatima the children got a message from Our Lady to fast on Wednesday and Saturday; this caused confusion until it was found to be “supported” by a verse in the Old Testament. Correct me if I’m wrong.

Going for a walk this morning it occurred to me that in the “Acren Rule” dating from the Middle Ages in England, about the same time as the anchorite Dame Julian of Norwich was writing “Revelations of Divine Love” there is a prayer recommended for frequent recitation:

“Lord Jesus Christ, Son of the Living God, have mercy upon us. Thou who didst deign to be born of a Virgin have mercy upon us.”
 
Thank you.
I think it was at Fatima the children got a message from Our Lady to fast on Wednesday and Saturday; this caused confusion until it was found to be “supported” by a verse in the Old Testament. Correct me if I’m wrong.

Going for a walk this morning it occurred to me that in the “Acren Rule” dating from the Middle Ages in England, about the same time as the anchorite Dame Julian of Norwich was writing “Revelations of Divine Love” there is a prayer recommended for frequent recitation:

“Lord Jesus Christ, Son of the Living God, have mercy upon us. Thou who didst deign to be born of a Virgin have mercy upon us.”
I had not heard that about the fasting on Wed and Sat. The Saturday does not make sense. Jews have never made it a practice to fast on the Shabbat. I know, because I’m a Hebrew Catholic. Fasting on a Shabbat is like fasting on a Solemnity on the Catholic calendar. I don’t know what passage in the OT this may be referring to. However, it could be that the passage is being misunderstood. Very often in Jewish tradition a fast was broken at the Shabbat. In other words you may have fasted from Wed to Sat, not including the Saturday.

We have to remember that the ancient Jews did not count days as we do. For example, by our system of counting, Christ rose in two days. He dies on Friday and rises on Sunday. That’s a 48-hour period. But in the Jewish system of counting, there is no zero. Day one is Friday, Saturday is day two and Sunday is day three.

This OT reference could very well be a Christian misunderstanding due to the way that we count days vs the way that they counted days. It can give the false impression that the Shabbat is counted as a day of fast in a series of days. I can see three days of fasting: Wed, Thu and Fri.

I’m speculating here, because I can’t say for sure without the actual OT citation. If I knew which one it was, I would be able to tell you how ancient Jews understood it.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
Fasting on the Saturday
(from New Advent, Catholic Encyclopedia)

Some hold that this practice was inaugurated to commemorate the burial of Christ Jesus; others that it was instituted to imitate the Apostles and Disciples of Christ, who, together with the Holy Women, mourned the death of Christ even on the seventh day; while others claim that it owes its origin to the conduct of St. Peter, who passed Saturday in prayer, abstinence, and fasting, to prepare to meet Simon Magus on the following day (Acts, viii, 18 sq.; cf. Migne, P.L. XLIX, coll. 147, 148). Though the Roman Pontiffs have constantly refused to abrogate the law of abstaining on Saturday, special indults dispensing with the obligation have been granted to the faithful in many parts of the world.

(The CAF has discussed fasting on Wednesday)

Being a Hebrew Catholic must shed a great deal more light and understanding on our Faith than is open to most of us. I look forward to reading more of your insights. Thank you.
 
Fasting on the Saturday
(from New Advent, Catholic Encyclopedia)

Some hold that this practice was inaugurated to commemorate the burial of Christ Jesus; others that it was instituted to imitate the Apostles and Disciples of Christ, who, together with the Holy Women, mourned the death of Christ even on the seventh day; while others claim that it owes its origin to the conduct of St. Peter, who passed Saturday in prayer, abstinence, and fasting, to prepare to meet Simon Magus on the following day (Acts, viii, 18 sq.; cf. Migne, P.L. XLIX, coll. 147, 148). Though the Roman Pontiffs have constantly refused to abrogate the law of abstaining on Saturday, special indults dispensing with the obligation have been granted to the faithful in many parts of the world.
Now this is all NT material. It makes sense. I thought your previous post made reference to something from the OT. That’s why it did not make sense to me.
(The CAF has discussed fasting on Wednesday)
Fasting and abstinence on Weds is a very old Latin Catholic tradition. It was started by monks, was later picked up by St. Francis and his brothers, who were not monks. Because the Franciscans had more contact with the laity, it was easy to transfer this practice over to the lay faithful. Though I can believe that those lay men and women who were intimately connected to the monasteries knew of this Wed practice and may have joined in.
Being a Hebrew Catholic must shed a great deal more light and understanding on our Faith than is open to most of us. I look forward to reading more of your insights. Thank you.
You’re most welcome. Unfortunately, my experience has been that many Latin Catholics are very hostile toward Hebrew Catholics. There are many of us and we keep a low profile. We even have a Hebrew Catholic Association and a little office in the Vatican that is part of the Catholic - Jewish Relations Department. Sadly, there is a resistance on the part of many Latin Catholics when a Hebrew Catholic steps up and says “Our people did not mean X, they meant Y.”

Some people mistakenly believe that because we convert to Catholicism we must also put aside our knowledge of our history, our culture, our language, our customs and our scriptures. If it were not for men like Pope Pius XII, John XXIII, Paul VI, John Paul II and Benedict XVI there would be very few conversions from Judaism to Catholicism. We have been blessed. Since WW II, the popes have been very supportive of Hebrew Catholics and very attentive to what we have to say about the content of sacred scripture and even Christian spirituality, including Christian forms of prayer, such as the rosary.

There was a very famous and holy Rabbi who taught at a Pontifical University in Rome and later worked with the Holy Father and the bishops to improve the Jewish-Catholic dialog, Rabbi Klenicke. He died not long ago.

Before he died, Pope Benedict granted him an indult. He became the only non Catholic to be admitted as a member of the Order of St.Gregory. The Order of St. Gregory is a fraternal society, sort of like the Knights of Columbus. However, it’s only for Catholic theologians. Rabbi Klenicke served the Catholic Church for many years as professor of Carmelite Spirituality and Prayer. He was an expert on the Carmelite tradition from the days when the Carmelites were running around with Elijah, to the later years when the European hermits arrived to live at Mt. Carmel all the way up to the reform by Teresa and John of the Cross. He never became a Catholic. He lived and died as a Rabbi. But he was an expert on Carmel and he brought to the study of Carmel the Jewish perspective, which is very important given that the Carmelite Order predates Christianity.

Unfortunately, there are still many people who believe that we (Jews) have nothing to add to help the understanding of Christianity. Most of us keep our mouths shut. There was a Jewish Cardinal who was very outspoken on this subject, especially in the area of prayer and mysticism. I’m struggling to recall his name. I know that he retired and he may be deceased. His family was killed in the Shoah.

Someday, we’ll be able to speak to each other without bias.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
Br. JR

Our discussion was the cause of me re-watching a DVD on Fatima - and being surprised how much I had forgotten - It wasn’t about fasting on Wednesday or Saturday !!! It was about why the visions took place on the 17th May - and it’s traced back to the Book of Esther.

If Latin Catholics don’t broaden their horizons to learn from the Jewish Faith it is their loss.
Years ago at University the professor in Biblical Studies “walked us through” (the Jewish) Passover - and how much richer our understanding for it!
I think it was in Auswitz St Maximillian Kolbe (another Franciscan) gave his life that a Jew might live.

And my greetings to the Jews for Jesus!

In a foreign country it’s wise to ask one of the locals to show us about -
How can Christianity be understood if not for our Jewish heritage?
 
When did the devotion of praying the Rosary begin and is that when the prayer “Hail Mary” originated?
Frankly I am sick of men in this age dismissing Saints and rewriting history to make things more like this age and less supernatural. Here is what a Saint Louis Marie De Montfort says.

Since the Rosary is composed, principally and in substance, of the prayer of Christ and the Angelic Salutation, that is, the Our Father and the Hail Mary, it was without doubt the first prayer and the principal devotion of the faithful and has been in use all through the centuries, from the time of the apostles and disciples down to the present.

It was only in the year 1214, however, that the Church received the Rosary in its present form and according to the method we use today. It was given to the Church by St. Dominic, who had received it from the Blessed Virgin as a means of converting the Albigensians and other sinners. Saint Dominic, seeing that the gravity of people’s sins was hindering the conversion of the Albigensians, withdrew into a forest near Toulouse, where he prayed continuously for three days and three nights. During this time he did nothing but weep and do harsh penances in order to appease the anger of God. He used his discipline so much that his body was lacerated, and finally he fell into a coma. At this point our Lady appeared to him, accompanied by three angels, and she said, “Dear Dominic, do you know which weapon the Blessed Trinity wants to use to reform the world?”
“Oh, my Lady”, answered Saint Dominic, “you know far better than I do, because next to your Son Jesus Christ you have always been the chief instrument of our salvation.”
Then our Lady replied, “I want you to know that, in this kind of warfare, the principal weapon has always been the Angelic Psalter, which is the foundation-stone of the New Testament. Therefore, if you want to reach these hardened souls and win them over to God, preach my Psalter.”
So he arose, comforted, and burning with zeal for the conversion of the people in that district, he made straight for the cathedral. At once unseen angels rang the bells to gather the people together, and Saint Dominic began to preach.

At the very beginning of his sermon, an appalling storm broke out, the earth shook, the sun was darkened, and there was so much thunder and lightning that all were very much afraid. Even greater was their fear when, looking at a picture of our Lady exposed in a prominent place, they saw her raise her arms to heaven three times to call down God’s vengeance upon them if they failed to be converted, to amend their lives, and seek the protection of the holy Mother of God. God wished, by means of these supernatural phenomena, to spread the new devotion of the holy Rosary and to make it more widely known. At last, at the prayer of Saint Dominic, the storm came to an end, and he went on preaching. So fervently and compellingly did he explain the importance and value of the Rosary that almost all the people of Toulouse embraced it and renounced their false beliefs. In a very short time a great improvement was seen in the town; people began leading Christian lives and gave up their former bad habits.

Inspired by the Holy Spirit, instructed by the Blessed Virgin as well as by his own experience, Saint Dominic preached the Rosary for the rest of his life. He preached it by his example as well as by his sermons, in cities and in country places, to people of high station and low, before scholars and the uneducated, to Catholics and to heretics.
The Rosary, which he said every day, was his preparation for every sermon and his little tryst with our Lady immediately after preaching.

One day he had to preach at Notre Dame in Paris, and it happened to be the feast of St. John the Evangelist. He was in a little chapel behind the high altar prayerfully preparing his sermon by saying the Rosary, as he always did, when our Lady appeared to him and said. “Dominic, even though what you have planned to say may be very good, I am bringing you a much better sermon.” Saint Dominic took in his hands the book our Lady proffered, read the sermon carefully and, when he had understood it and meditated on it, he gave thanks to her. When the time came, he went up into the pulpit and, in spite of the feast day, made no mention of Saint John other than to say that he had been found worthy to be the guardian of the Queen of Heaven. The congregation was made up of theologians and other eminent people, who were used to hearing unusual and polished discourses; but Saint Dominic told them that it was not his desire to give them a learned discourse, wise in the eyes of the world, but that he would speak in the simplicity of the Holy Spirit and with his forcefulness. So he began preaching the Rosary and explained the Hail Mary word by word as he would to a group of children, and used the very simple illustrations which were in the book given him by our Lady.

Blessed Alan, according to Carthagena, mentioned several other occasions when our Lord and our Lady appeared to Saint Dominic to urge him and inspire him to preach the Rosary more and more in order to wipe out sin and convert sinners and heretics. In another passage Carthagena says. "Blessed Alan said our Lady revealed to him that, after she had appeared to Saint Dominic, her blessed Son appeared to him and said:
'Dominic, I rejoice to see that you are not relying on your own wisdom and that, rather than seek the empty praise of men, you are working with great humility for the salvation of souls.
 
Earlier I wrote the Feast of Our Lady of Fatima is 17th May - correction, it’s the 13th.

PioKolby it’s legends like the one’s you give us that keep me going, fuel for the journey.

And for those with children, it’s great, simple examples of sanctity that excite.

I too have a sweet tooth !
What appeals to one person doesn’t necessarily content another. Some like sweet, some like savory (deeply written theological texts) In Paris St Dominic offered up something sweet and found the majority of us are spiritual children.
 
Frankly I am sick of men in this age dismissing Saints and rewriting history to make things more like this age and less supernatural.
You’ll have to take this up with the canonical successor of St. Dominic. According to the Order of Preachers, this is a nice story, but not the way it happened. If the canonical successor of the the Holy Father Dominic agrees with this statement, there is nothing left to say. 🤷

St. Louis was not a Dominican. He was not the successor of St. Dominic; therefore, he does not have the authority to speak for the Dominican tradition or the Dominican founder. Only the canonical successor has that authority. It is very likely that St. Louis learned the same legend that everyone else learned.

There is nothing heretical or wrong in the Dominicans clarifying what is and is not accurate about their Spiritual Father. Do you see yourself as more knowledgeable on Dominican history and Dominican spirituality than the successor of St. Dominic? I wouldn’t dare say such a thing. I’m not a Dominican.

Don’t let your passion cloud common sense. If the successors of the great St. Dominic, who know him better than the rest of us tell us that this is not the way it happened and we continue to argue that it did happen this way, all we’re doing is following our emotions. We’re not achieving anything, nor learning anything.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
. Do you see yourself as more knowledgeable on Dominican history and Dominican spirituality than the successor of St. Dominic? I wouldn’t dare say such a thing. I’m not a Dominican.

Don’t let your passion cloud common sense.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
With all due respect don’t allow your intelligence to cloud your faith. Faith and reason flow well together. To dismiss the origins of the rosary as a “nice” story or a legend (meaning myth meaning not true) a nice myth a cute myth but a myth none the less goes against the constant beliefs of the faithful for centuries. This hurts Our Lady. To downplay the supernatural origins of the rosary which was given directly from heaven for spiritual warfare and to defeat heresy downplays the supernatural power of the rosary which harms souls. This is not just a nice cute thing some Catholics do. Next to the Holy sacrifice of the Mass the rosary holds a place among Catholics that is supernaturally important. Why? heaven said so.

Why do I say this? The fruits of the rosary. Souls that are quick to dismiss and downplay the supernatural origins of the rosary are the same people who when Fatima comes up give the standard " you know we don’t have to believe that" while we have truth in that statement under it lies a hidden work of Satan to bring the Faith and the Church down to a new humanism where we have no place for floating Saints and direct messages of Our Lady bleeding hosts and a like. Now we have a more common sense take on things. This is error. You asked. Do you see yourself as more knowledgeable on Dominican history and Dominican spirituality than the successor of St. Dominic? No I do not.

Do you think you are more knowledgeable than POPE LEO XIII? Who said this in SUPREMI APOSTOLATUS OFFICIO: vatican.va/holy_father/leo_xiii/encyclicals/documents/hf_l-xiii_enc_01091883_supremi-apostolatus-officio_en.html
“There is none among you, venerable brethren, who will not remember how great trouble and grief God’s Holy Church suffered from the Albigensian heretics, who sprung from the sect of the later Manicheans, and who filled the South of France and other portions of the Latin world with their pernicious errors, and carrying everywhere the terror of their arms, strove far and wide to rule by massacre and ruin. Our merciful God, as you know, raised up against these most direful enemies a most holy man, the illustrious parent and founder of the Dominican Order. Great in the integrity of his doctrine, in his example of virtue, and by his apostolic labours, he proceeded undauntedly to attack the enemies of the Catholic Church, not by force of arms; but trusting wholly to that devotion which he was the first to institute under the name of the Holy Rosary, which was disseminated through the length and breadth of the earth by him and his pupils.** Guided, in fact, by divine inspiration and grace, he foresaw that this devotion, like a most powerful warlike weapon, would be the means of putting the enemy to flight, and of confounding their audacity and mad impiety. **Such was indeed its result. Thanks to this new method of prayer-when adopted and properly carried out as instituted by the Holy Father St. Dominic-piety, faith, and union began to return, and the projects and devices of the heretics to fall to pieces. Many wanderers also returned to the way of salvation, and the wrath of the impious was restrained by the arms of those Catholics who had determined to repel their violence.”
And John Paul II said this in ROSARIUM VIRGINIS MARIAE: vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/apost_letters/documents/hf_jp-ii_apl_20021016_rosarium-virginis-mariae_en.html
“The Rosary of the Virgin Mary, which gradually took form in the second millennium under the guidance of the Spirit of God, is a prayer loved by countless Saints and encouraged by the Magisterium”
This is no way overturns what POPE LEO XIII said on the matter. So I follow what the Popes have said on this. If we see a difference between the successor of St. Dominic and the successor of St. Peter. I follow St. Peter it is the keys.
This is beautiful: youtube.com/watch?v=vba2NLbaOo4&feature=related
In Christ,
Pio
 
JReducation

Could it be that the legend is just an expression of the same reality - a bit like the story of St George and the dragon. A saint rescuing a village from evil.
Possibly the legend of Saint Dominic being given the rosary by Our Lady and it evolving through history are expressions of the one reality - we still see it evolving with Blessed Pope John Paul 2 adding the Mysteries of Light.
Perhaps it is the same story, with different ways of expressing the one truth.

N.B. Please don’t take from that I’m inferring the different denominations all say the same as the Catholic Church. That all the Churches are the One Truth; that would be taking the analogy a step too far.

Or that the Bible stories didn’t really happen!
 
Could it be that the legend is just an expression of the same reality - a bit like the story of St George and the dragon. A saint rescuing a village from evil.
Possibly the legend of Saint Dominic being given the rosary by Our Lady and it evolving through history are expressions of the one reality - we still see it evolving with Blessed Pope John Paul 2 adding the Mysteries of Light.
Perhaps it is the same story, with different ways of expressing the one truth.
Allow me to start with a disclaimer. I’m a Franciscan not a Dominican. Although we have a shared history, we also have traveled down different paths. Our paths are like a braid. The Dominicans, Franciscans and Jesuits are each a strand of hair in the same braid.

The reason that I begin with the disclaimer is because I have not read everything that the Dominicans have written about this story. I’ve read articles here and there. I believe that I linked one of them to this thread. The one thing that I know for sure is that the Dominicans affirm that this is not a literal event.

They do not deny the power and place of the rosary. Good grief, they made it popular. They have a great devotion to it.

Having said that, I can see how the legend can be part of a reality, like that of St. George and the dragon. That would make sense.

There was an old custom of praying the Paters with the pebbles and later beads. The same beads are then used to pray the Aves. However, while all of this is happening with the beads, the Paters and the Aves, you have Dominic’s inspiration to teach the people to pray the Eastern Prayer to the Theotokos. He Latinizes it and one of his sons gives it more structure creating the rosary beads. Finally, in the Church adds the rest of the Hail Mary.

Through all of this we see God’s hand at work and Dominic and his sons as the protagonists in the development of this devotion. It does not take anything away from God, Our Lady or Dominic. On the contrary, it simply shows God at work through his people and for his people.

As a Franciscan, I will say this, I find it believable that Dominic did not receive the rosary in a vision for one simple reason. The literature and different traditions show us, there have been and still are many rosaries. The Eastern Catholics have a version. The Orthodox Christians have a very similar one to that of the Eastern Catholics. The Franciscans have another version and the Carthusians have a version of their own. Then there were versions that have fallen out of use. Now we have five additional mysteries.

If Our Lady appeared to Dominic and gave him the “official” rosary with 15 decades, then why do we have all of these other versions? Are they truly Christian? Are they pleasing to Our Lady? Are they truly rosaries?

My answer is that all of these versions are a result of our mysterious interaction with the Mother of God. Throughout history, during different situations and in response to different needs, Our Lady was allowed to inspire us according to the need of the moment. She always gave us something that pointed us to meditate not on her, but on her Son.

People get angry when we say that the Dominicans deny the ancient story. I always say, “Don’t shoot me. I’m not a Dominican. I’m only repeating what they say about themselves and their founder.”

Personally, it’s like everything else. There are so many stories about the Franciscan saints. Remember, we’re 114 different congregations that make up one order with one founder. We have a lot of canonized saints and many Blesseds too.

Anyway, there are all kinds of stories about the more popular Franciscan saints and blesseds: Francis, Anthony of Padua, Bonaventure, Clare of Assisi, Pio, and Maximilian Kolbe. We Franciscans do a lot of research into these stories and find that many of them are legends based on some grain of fact. A simple example. Posters may have seen pictures of St. Clare holding a monstrance.

Legend has it that the town was invaded and when they went to climb the wall to invade the monastery, Clare got up from her sickbed, went to the chapel, picked up the monstrance, climbed up the cloister wall and holding the monstrance repelled the would-be invaders. It’s a wonderful story except for several details.
  1. They didn’t have monstrances during Clare’s time. She never saw one. That came much later.
  2. The convent of San Damiano does not have a wall around it. It never did.
  3. Clare was too sick to climb, even if they had had a wall.
So what’s the truth?

There was an invasion of the city and the invaders were headed for the monastery. Clare was sick in her bed. Her bed had been moved to a room next to the chapel where a ciborium was kept on the altar for perpetual adoration. Clare got up and took the ciborium, went to the window and made the sign of the cross through an open window. It just happens that San Damiano sits on a hill. Those who are invading are coming from below and they’re looking up. We know that the invaders never reached the monastery. The nuns were protected by the Blessed Sacrament.

You see how the details get turned around and we have monstrances and sick nuns climbing walls and invaders falling on their knees in shock, etc etc… When you go to San Damiano, the nuns look at you as if you had just spoken to them about someone else. That’s not the Clare that they know.

I think that this is happening with St. Dominic. Our lady did many things through him and his sons. I believe that all of the stories were merged into one event involving Dominic to the exclusion of everyone else. Even popes read the story and believed it. We all did. Until recent discoveries in Dominican archives and writings have suggested a more complex and mysterious involvement between our Lady, Dominic and his sons.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
Dear Brother keep up the good work I enjoy and learn a lot from your postings.

Unfortunately for me, the stories are far more enjoyable than the reality.
Reading them I re-enter an innocent childhood, a time wherein it never rained, and it was always springtime - Robin Hood and the stories of Sherwood Forest, Camelot and King Arthur, the Little Flowers of St Francis, the stories of Our Lady, the saints and the angels. Honestly, I don’t care if they never happened. I don’t read them to become learned, I read them to be inspired. And I think that is what many of them are there for, and the reason why many of them live on through the centuries.

At heart I am a romantic - romance brought me to the Catholic Faith, and keeps me in it.
Romance took me on pilgrimage through Europe, to become a friar, monk and a hermit.

But I do enjoy your wisdom, your passing on your knowledge and attempts to educate. God bless you…and I see that indeed he does.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top