When does "evening" begin on a Saturday?

  • Thread starter Thread starter FrDavid96
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
And the obligation at the time, from the 1917 Code of Canon law was: the faithful are bound to hear mass on holy days of obligation (which includes all Sundays).

So, one finds oneself at a Mass at 2:30 PM on Sunday. Obligation fulfilled?

If not, why not? Is it because that 2:30 mass isn’t a mass? (Surely no?) Or is it because attending a illicit mass means de facto that one has not fulfilled one’s obligation? Would you have to go to Mass again at a (licit) 5PM one?
This seems like a completely different subject than the OP. I think the answer to this question would have to be found in the notes of the original law itself.

But the answer to that question does nothing to solve the problem of when evening begins on Saturdays, liturgically speaking.
 
Fr. David,

Thanks for the reply. Again this is academic, because I agree with you about the anticipated mass issue, and I think you’ve laid out the case why this is so. BUT, I don’t think I am communicating my (and tee_'s?) point effectively. I’m not sure if you want to pursue it. (I think its useful because it seems to show where the alternate position comes from, and how to argue against it.)

If you do want to pursue it, thanks in advance. I’m sure it will help me to understand the issues more clearly. So, in case its worthwhile, here is what I’m asking:
As for the issue of when evening begins, and when the Sunday obligation begins to be fulfilled, I cannot imagine a difference between the two. The only thing I’ve heard in support of this is that some canonists say that evening begins at noon, therefore we can have 2 different standards. But I’ve heard nothing to support how this could be possible. How can we make any distinction between the beginning of evening, and the beginning of the time for Sunday Mass. That’s what I’m just not seeing. I’m willing to listen to an explanation, but from my point of view, I have yet to hear one. I’m willing to pursue it, but I’m just missing the place where anyone said anything in support of the idea, other than to just state it. Maybe I’m just missing it. How about a seperate message post presenting only that argument, so it’s clear to me?
Ok, but the question is *why? *Let’s prescind for the moment from considering vigil masses or anticipated masses. Let’s look only at Sunday Masses during the time of *Christus Dominus. *The rule was, until then, no Sunday mass could be celebrated later than 1 hr after midday noon. Christus Dominus allowed for a Sunday evening mass, but only after 4PM.
So here was the rule at the time: masses should not be celebrated on Sunday between 1PM and 4PM.
And the obligation at the time, from the 1917 Code of Canon law was: the faithful are bound to hear mass on holy days of obligation (which includes all Sundays).
So, one finds oneself at a Mass at 2:30 PM on Sunday. Obligation fulfilled?
If not, *why not? *Is it because that 2:30 mass isn’t a mass? (Surely no?) Or is it because attending a illicit mass means de facto that one has not fulfilled one’s obligation? Would you have to go to Mass again at a (licit) 5PM one?
Thanks!
VC
So, you have a copy of the 1917 Code? Great. That’s what we’ve been needing.

Here’s how I see it (just how I see it). If a person attended a Mass at 2:30 on Sunday, yes that person fulfilled the obligation.

Attending an illicit (yet still valid) Mass does not mean that the obligation hasn’t been fulfilled. Otherwise there are many many Catholics in the US who haven’t fulfilled their obligation in a long time! We can’t hold the congregation responsible for the errors of the priest.

I would say that the priest himself is acting illicitly by scheduling the Mass at a prohibited time, unless something else intervenes (like a dispensation or extreme unusual circumstances), so the priest is in the wrong, but I would not doubt that the obligation has been fulfilled–unless there’s something else in the old canon law, or some authoritative interpretation of it which indicates the contrary (which I doubt).
 
This seems like a completely different subject than the OP. I think the answer to this question would have to be found in the notes of the original law itself.

But the answer to that question does nothing to solve the problem of when evening begins on Saturdays, liturgically speaking.
I think that’s what this is leading to: saying that if one could attend an illicit Mass on Sunday and fulfill the obligation, then the same would apply to a Saturday.
 
I think that’s what this is leading to: saying that if one could attend an illicit Mass on Sunday and fulfill the obligation, then the same would apply to a Saturday.
It wouldn’t be “illicit” in the same sense, though. It would just be a Saturday Mass, with the wrong readings.

Not the first time, either - we have a Psalmist for our Saturday Mass who insists on always using the Sunday Psalm (not the brightest bulb on the Christmas tree, but he is an enthusiastic volunteer). It’s still a Saturday Mass, though, even though the wrong Psalm is used, and I assume the same case would apply even if all of the readings were from Sunday, instead of Saturday. Would it not?

And it still wouldn’t count for Sunday, although it would count for the Indulgence associated with Our Lady’s First Saturday, if it happened to be the first Saturday of the month - I think? 🤷

🙂
 
It wouldn’t be “illicit” in the same sense, though. It would just be a Saturday Mass, with the wrong readings.

Not the first time, either - we have a Psalmist for our Saturday Mass who insists on always using the Sunday Psalm (not the brightest bulb on the Christmas tree, but he is an enthusiastic volunteer). It’s still a Saturday Mass, though, even though the wrong Psalm is used, and I assume the same case would apply even if all of the readings were from Sunday, instead of Saturday. Would it not?

And it still wouldn’t count for Sunday, although it would count for the Indulgence associated with Our Lady’s First Saturday, if it happened to be the first Saturday of the month - I think? 🤷

🙂
Yes. The person who decides to go with the Sunday readings/propers would be in the wrong, but it would be a Saturday Mass, and would do nothing to count toward the Sunday obligation.

I believe that certain provisions are made for using alternate psalms at weekday Masses. I’m certain that there are provisions, but I don’t know exactly what they say as I never exercise the option. It might be perfectly licit, or it might not.

There are definately responsorial psalms (the response part, not the psalm part) which can be used throughout a given season and this is perfectly licit. In the Easter Season, “Alleluia” is always an acceptable response, as an alternative to the given one. There are also responses provided for Ordinal time which can be used throughout the entire season in place of the particular one.
 
Yes. The person who decides to go with the Sunday readings/propers would be in the wrong, but it would be a Saturday Mass, and would do nothing to count toward the Sunday obligation.

I believe that certain provisions are made for using alternate psalms at weekday Masses. I’m certain that there are provisions, but I don’t know exactly what they say as I never exercise the option. It might be perfectly licit, or it might not.
In our case, the priest allows it because, first of all, he isn’t aware that the wrong Psalm is about to be used until the Psalmist begins to sing it (he doesn’t consult with him before the start of the Mass) and he doesn’t get after him later on, because he doesn’t want to dampen the fellow’s enthusiasm - he figures eventually the guy will notice that the other readings are different than Sunday, and hopefully he’ll think of asking someone why, and then find out about the existence of weekday and Saturday Masses. (This particular fellow only helps out at certain times of the year; I don’t think he’s even aware that there is a Mass every Saturday morning; not just the specific ones that he helps out with.)
There are definately responsorial psalms (the response part, not the psalm part) which can be used throughout a given season and this is perfectly licit. In the Easter Season, “Alleluia” is always an acceptable response, as an alternative to the given one. There are also responses provided for Ordinal time which can be used throughout the entire season in place of the particular one.
Yes, I’m aware of these. They’re usually listed as alternates in the books that we use. 🙂

This particular Psalmist hasn’t discovered the existence of these little books, yet, though - he is working from the Sunday Missal, which doesn’t make any reference to weekday and Saturday Masses.
 
This is an old post but I am searching for an answer. I just moved to the Diocese of St. Augustine in Jacksonville, Florida and to my surprise I attended the 12:10pm Daily Mass today, Saturday, and it was the anticipatory Mass for Sunday. It really shocked me since I have been all over the world and attend Mass daily and never in my life have I seen an anticipatory Mass at noon on Saturday.

I don’t really need to know canon law on the issue. All I need to know is, can the Bishop ok this? If so, I am ok with it. If not, I should contact the Diocese and ask them what is going on and if they know about it. I would hate to do this as I don’t want to be a luddite. It just really shocked me.
 
When “evening Masses” were first allowed (1953) they were not to be celebrated before 4 p.m. See “Christus Dominus”. Has anything been written since to change the definition of ‘evening’?
We see in both the liturgical and canon laws, that the days are midnight to midnight, however celebrations begin on the evening of the previous day. The 1983 canon law intentionally did not give an exact moment, so that does represent a difference from any prior hard limit. In practice, for example, St. Damian in Oak Forest, IL had the Christmas Vigil Mass at 3:00 pm Saturday in 2014. They also celebrated Christmas Vigil Mass at 4:30 pm, 6:00 pm, and later that night at midnight.

Christus Dominus referred to both evening and four o’clock in the afternoon on selected days.Rule VI. If the circumstance calls for it as necessary, We grant to the local Ordinaries the right to permit the celebration of Mass in the evening, as we said, but in such wise that the Mass shall not begin before four o’clock in the afternoon, …
 
This is an old post but I am searching for an answer. I just moved to the Diocese of St. Augustine in Jacksonville, Florida and to my surprise I attended the 12:10pm Daily Mass today, Saturday, and it was the anticipatory Mass for Sunday. It really shocked me since I have been all over the world and attend Mass daily and never in my life have I seen an anticipatory Mass at noon on Saturday.

I don’t really need to know canon law on the issue. All I need to know is, can the Bishop ok this? If so, I am ok with it. If not, I should contact the Diocese and ask them what is going on and if they know about it. I would hate to do this as I don’t want to be a luddite. It just really shocked me.
The liturgical days of solemnities (which includes all Sundays) begin in the evening of the previous calendar day. Evening, not noon.

If you have questions, I would suggest directing them to the Liturgy Office at the Diocese. I’d suggest a question, not a complaint. Just ask them when the Sunday Mass may be celebrated on Saturday evening. Let them give you the answer.
 
This is an old post but I am searching for an answer. I just moved to the Diocese of St. Augustine in Jacksonville, Florida and to my surprise I attended the 12:10pm Daily Mass today, Saturday, and it was the anticipatory Mass for Sunday. It really shocked me since I have been all over the world and attend Mass daily and never in my life have I seen an anticipatory Mass at noon on Saturday.

I don’t really need to know canon law on the issue. All I need to know is, can the Bishop ok this? If so, I am ok with it. If not, I should contact the Diocese and ask them what is going on and if they know about it. I would hate to do this as I don’t want to be a luddite. It just really shocked me.
You can read the liturgical norms here (first reference below, from 1969) which will give you the general schema, that observance of a Sunday and a solemnity begins on the preceding liturgical day, but the determination of that time is made by the local ordinary, according to Eucharisticum Mysterium (see second reference below, from 1967). There was a limit of 4 pm established in 1957 at which time there was for those evenings, a three hour fast from food established as a Eucharistic fast rather than from midnight, so it actually served as a safeguard to those finishing lunch by 1 pm.**
I. The Liturgical Day in General**

The liturgical day runs from midnight to midnight, but the observance of Sunday and solemnities begins with the evening of the preceding day. III. Solemnities, Feasts, and Memorials11. Solemnities are counted as the principal days in the calendar and their observance begins with evening prayer I of the preceding day. Some also have their own vigil Mass for use when Mass is celebrated in the evening of the preceding day.
  1. Feasts are celebrated within the limits of the natural day and accordingly do not have evening prayer I. Exceptions are feasts of the Lord that fall on a Sunday in Ordinary Time and in the Christmas season and that replace the Sunday office.
    Code:
     14. Memorials are either obligatory or optional. Their observance is         integrated into the celebration of the occurring weekday in accord with         the norms set forth in the General Instructions of the Roman Missal and         the Liturgy of the Hours.
ewtn.com/library/CURIA/CDWLITYR.HTMFrom Eucharisticum Mysterium (Instruction on the Worship of the Eucharistic Mystery) May 25, 1967:
  1. Anticipating the Sunday and Feast Day Masses on the Previous Evening
Where permission has been granted by the Apostolic See to fulfill the Sunday obligation on the preceding Saturday evening, pastors should explain the meaning of this permission carefully to the faithful and should ensure that the significance of Sunday is not thereby obscured. The purpose of this concession is in fact to enable the Christians of today to celebrate more easily the day of the resurrection of the Lord.

All concessions and contrary customs notwithstanding, when celebrated on Saturday this Mass may be celebrated only in the evening, at times determined by the local Ordinary.

In these cases the Mass celebrated is that assigned in the calendar to Sunday, the homily and the prayer of the faithful are not to be omitted.

What has been said above is equally valid for the Mass on holy days of obligation which for the same reason has been transferred to the preceding evening.

catholicliturgy.com/index.cfm/FuseAction/DocumentContents/Index/2/SubIndex/11/DocumentIndex/338
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top