When Homosexuals love eachother

[epan]

I was referring to the “3rd side” - the undecided. As to the first 2 sides, both know that one is wrong. And that side typically starts from a flawed premise.

You completely ignore my point, in order to reiterate your own perspective blindly and without regard to the truth of the human experience. Why do you bother?

It seems that the point of the CAF worshippers is to regurgitate a certain perspective, with regard to the history of the Roman Church, without regard to the reality of the current Roman Church, or the actual history… without regard to much except the ultra party line.

Can you explain this phenomenon?

It may be part of the explanation for the apparent statistics that CAF drives people away from Roman Christianity, when the goal is precisely the opposite.

 

[Rau]

You completely ignore my point, in order to reiterate your own perspective blindly and without regard to the truth of the human experience. Why do you bother?

I did not ignore you. That both sides perceive they may be right is pretty common in any debate, for were it not so, there would be no debate.

What truth is it you speak of?

 

[epan]

I did not ignore you. That both sides perceive they may be right is pretty common in any debate, for were it not so, there would be no debate.

What truth is it you speak of?

Once again. You ignored my post, or you would not ask the question.

The truth which I speak of is that people ascribe a nature or “telios” in the Aristotelian sense to issues such as marriage and abortion.

If you don’t get that, then take the time to understand the issue more deeply, and work through Sandel’s lectures, or anything similar.

 

[Rau]

Once again. You ignored my post, or you would not ask the question.

The truth which I speak of is that people ascribe a nature or “telios” in the Aristotelian sense to issues such as marriage and abortion.

If you don’t get that, then take the time to understand the issue more deeply, and work through Sandel’s lectures, or anything similar.

Perhaps you confuse me with another?

You posted:
“I wonder what the point of discussing this topic on this site is? The vast majority who read the thread have much the same position on the issue. The few who dissent are unlikely to be influenced by anything posted.”

And I responded:
“Perhaps those discerning what is right will benefit?”

Your posts beyond that appear to be taking issue with something I’ve not said!

 

[Rau]

…It seems that the point of the CAF worshippers is to regurgitate a certain perspective, with regard to the history of the Roman Church, without regard to the reality of the current Roman Church, or the actual history… without regard to much except the ultra party line.

Can you explain this phenomenon?

No, since I have no idea what you are talking about. I’ve not mentioned any Church at all.