N
Nickname_Sam
Guest
Is it a sin, and if so, a mortal sin, to let yourself be aroused if you’re not actually thinking of sex or objectifying anyone?
That is not entirely true. It is not wrong for a to hold hands or sit next to each other on the couch, even if that also leads one of them to become somewhat aroused, so long as the arousal is neither sought nor dwelt upon.It is a sin when it is done freely, intentionally, and knowingly, regardless of whether or not you are thinking of sex or objectifying someone.
Depends…the arousal in and of itself is never a sin…it’s your motivation…concupiscence is not a sin, but when it turns to lust, it turns to sin.That is not entirely true. It is not wrong for a to hold hands or sit next to each other on the couch, even if that also leads one of them to become somewhat aroused, so long as the arousal is neither sought nor dwelt upon.
oh, of course, but if you don’t intend it or dwell on the arousal then it isn’t lust. Its just an unlooked for physical response.Depends…the arousal in and of itself is never a sin…it’s your motivation…concupiscence is not a sin, but when it turns to lust, it turns to sin.
Sorry meant to reply to polytropos comment…oh, of course, but if you don’t intend it or dwell on the arousal then it isn’t lust. Its just an unlooked for physical response.![]()
Sorry. I was reading this thread in context of the author’s other recent thread, so I assumed that he was concerned about what might constitute masturbation.That is not entirely true. It is not wrong for a to hold hands or sit next to each other on the couch, even if that also leads one of them to become somewhat aroused, so long as the arousal is neither sought nor dwelt upon.
So, it’s only a sin if I’m purposely making it happen to get the arousal? What if you’re going along and you do or or say think something that you know will give you an arousal but you’re not purposely doing it so you get one?It is a sin when it is done freely, intentionally, and knowingly, regardless of whether or not you are thinking of sex or objectifying someone.
In this case it would probably depend. You should avoid what you know will give you arousal if you are capable of doing so. Sometimes it’s unreasonable to do so, but you should avoid occasions of sin (things that you know could lead you to sin).So, it’s only a sin if I’m purposely making it happen to get the arousal? What if you’re going along and you do or or say think something that you know will give you an arousal but you’re not purposely doing it so you get one?
Can I hold hands with a girl I like even though I know for a fact it will cause arousal/erection? Even if it is not my intention to get aroused?It is a sin when it is done freely, intentionally, and knowingly, regardless of whether or not you are thinking of sex or objectifying someone.
Didn’t someone just ask this thread?Can I hold hands with a girl I like even though I know for a fact it will cause arousal/erection? Even if it is not my intention to get aroused?
On the assumption you are a single man, interested in a future marriage, I do hope when you find “the one”, she too has read Aquinas. If not, I fear you have found a good strategy to remain single.if you are not aroused from time to time you are dead.
my rule is basically this.
when I find myself in the company of a woman that I find attractive and I become aware of the fact that my loins are moving I force the discusion towards a subject like asking her if she has ever read Thomas Aquinas.
In short I introduce God into the preceedings.
There is nothing like theology to numb the senses.
don’t mock it… it works for me