When Someone Falsely Calls You a ‘Racist,’ Should You Call Him a Pedophile?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Johann_du_Toit
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Make America Great Again!

We should call no one a racist; we should call no one a pedophile. It is a stigma.
 
I didn’t read the article, but on the surface of it, I can’t see what good this would do. If anything, it would probably serve to intensify the hatred and mistrust.
 
And illogical. At least I now know not to click on that source again.
 
I agree with that. And I think the point of the article is just that, and shows how pointless namecalling and flinging of insults is.
 
When Someone Falsely Calls You a ‘Racist,’ Should You Call Him a Pedophile?

Maybe not pedophile, but you could say, “I know you are but what am I?” or “No, you are. Times infinity.” And then hope he doesn’t pull out “You are infinity plus one!” There’s really no recovering from infinity plus one.

From the article: “… tries to tie the pro-life movement to white nationalism. …”
This makes complete sense, since most abortions are performed on racial minorities, meaning that the babies of color are the ones more likely to be aborted, which . . . wait, that doesn’t make sense. Does it? :crazy_face:
 
Last edited:
I think it’s okay to call out actual racism and actual pedophilia, but certainly we shouldn’t use those accusations as weapons against people we simply dislike or disagree with.

The person calling someone a racist presumably actually believes they have shown racist behavior or attitudes, even if their standards for such might not be as strict as the accused person’s. But the article seems to be advocating calling people pedophiles when you have no reason to believe they actually are. That is wicked.
 
I agree with that. And I think the point of the article is just that, and shows how pointless namecalling and flinging of insults is.
That is absolutely not the point of the article. The author is actually serious!!
He wrote this to conclude:
Now that we know what such people really mean when they call us “racist,” perhaps it’s time to turn it around. What if we threw back the equally career-ending charge of “pedophile”? Of course, our enemy will vigorously deny it, just as we denied being “racists.” We can double down just as they did…

…I don’t know if doing this would work. I do know that leftists never back down from any tactic until it blows up in their faces. Maybe, just maybe, a few miles of walking in our moccasins would teach them the danger of cheapening grave charges for rank political gain. Maybe not. Is it worth a try?


It is probably the worst idea I have ever heard. He needs somebody to walk him around the block until his breathing slows down. Get the man some air. Any Christian being falsely accused on account of righteousness is getting exactly what the New Testament predicted.

Blessed are you when they insult you and persecute you and utter every kind of evil against you falsely because of me. Rejoice and be glad, for your reward will be great in heaven.
Thus they persecuted the prophets who were before you.
Matt. 5:11-12
 
Last edited:
When Someone Falsely Calls You a ‘Racist,’ Should You Call Him a Pedophile?

Maybe not pedophile, but you could say, “I know you are but what am I?” or “No, you are. Times infinity.” And then hope he doesn’t pull out “You are infinity plus one!” There’s really no recovering from infinity plus one.

From the article: “… tries to tie the pro-life movement to white nationalism. …”
This makes complete sense, since most abortions are performed on racial minorities, meaning that the babies of color are the ones more likely to be aborted, which . . . wait, that doesn’t make sense. Does it? :crazy_face:
There’s always the good old “infinity plus two/five/ten/random number that is greater than one” 🤣
 
I don’t think we should fire back with insults, just because someone insults us. If someone falsely calls you a racist, I think the best thing to do is just tell the person that you are not a racist, and try to ignore it. The next time you are falsely called a racist it won’t hurt so much, I think.
 
But the article seems to be advocating calling people pedophiles when you have no reason to believe they actually are. That is wicked.
Bingo! And wicked is not too strong a word, either. Doing something like that would be a serious offense against the truth, not to mention against charity. If someone would defend the good in such a way, they deserve to hear, "Get behind me, Satan! You are an obstacle to me. You are thinking not as God does, but as human beings do.” Matt. 16:23
 
Last edited:
Umm, you’re clearly an amateur. Everyone knows that infinity times infinity trumps infinity plus one. It is not permitted in any of the manuals to add to infinity x infinity, and the first person to call it wins. That’s why I always break it out as soon as an argument starts, especially when testifying in court.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top